Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 12:51 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 12:51
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
810,848
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,848
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,848
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Adit_
Joined: 04 Jun 2024
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 694
Own Kudos:
226
 [2]
Given Kudos: 116
Posts: 694
Kudos: 226
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
thisisakr
Joined: 07 Mar 2023
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 124
Own Kudos:
77
 [1]
Given Kudos: 72
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: ISB Foster LBS
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q86 V83 DI77 (Online)
Products:
Schools: ISB Foster LBS
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q86 V83 DI77 (Online)
Posts: 124
Kudos: 77
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement 1: it makes it very clear that marco folder is smaller so obviously that would be copied considering we are using smaller files due to space constraints. —— sufficient

Statement 2: This says the space left is less than Elena so again Marco becomes obvious answer —— sufficient

D
User avatar
dp1234
Joined: 15 Nov 2021
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 95
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 166
Products:
Posts: 95
Kudos: 66
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO B.

Statement 1: M<E . But questions says either M or either E could fit in the drive. So either M or E can fit. Not sufficient.
Statement 2: After copying S to drive, free space on drive is less than E. So E can't be copied. But questions says one can be copied - so its M. Sufficient.
Bunuel
Elena, Marco, and Sofia each had one folder to copy to an external drive that was nearly full. From the sizes of the three folders, they knew that before any space was cleared, Sofia’s folder and exactly one of the other two folders could be copied to the drive, while the remaining folder would have to wait. Which folder could be copied along with Sofia’s folder before any space was cleared?

(1) Marco’s folder was smaller than Elena’s folder.
(2) After Sofia’s folder was copied, the remaining free space would be less than the size of Elena’s folder.

Experience GMAT Club Test Questions
Yes, you've landed on a GMAT Club Tests question
Craving more? Unlock our full suite of GMAT Club Tests here
Want to experience more? Get a taste of our tests with our free trial today
Rise to the challenge with GMAT Club Tests. Happy practicing!
User avatar
Adit_
Joined: 04 Jun 2024
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 694
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 116
Posts: 694
Kudos: 226
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement 1 is sufficient IMO.
Think of it like this:

There are 3 people.
One person is already in (Sofia in this case).
ONLY one more WILL join for sur but you dont know who.
The statement says Marco<Elena.
Think the reverse way, can Elena actually join our list?

Let's assume Elena does get in.
Sofia and Elena is in our list now.
If Elena is in then how did Marco not make it? It is logically not possible that Marco with lesser space couldn't get in but Elena with more space got in.
This contradicts with the statement we are provided with, this Marco indeed joins with Sofia and Elena is out.

dp1234
IMO B.

Statement 1: M<E . But questions says either M or either E could fit in the drive. So either M or E can fit. Not sufficient.
Statement 2: After copying S to drive, free space on drive is less than E. So E can't be copied. But questions says one can be copied - so its M. Sufficient.

User avatar
truplayer256
Joined: 07 Mar 2009
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Adit_
Statement 1 is sufficient IMO.
Think of it like this:

There are 3 people.
One person is already in (Sofia in this case).
ONLY one more WILL join for sur but you dont know who.
The statement says Marco<Elena.
Think the reverse way, can Elena actually join our list?

Let's assume Elena does get in.
Sofia and Elena is in our list now.
If Elena is in then how did Marco not make it? It is logically not possible that Marco with lesser space couldn't get in but Elena with more space got in.
This contradicts with the statement we are provided with, this Marco indeed joins with Sofia and Elena is out.


This is not necessarily true regarding statement 1 being sufficient. What if the amount of remaining space was X and Elena had E amount of space where E < X, and X - E < M, then Marco will not make it. On the other hand, what if X - M < E, then Elena won't make it.
User avatar
Adit_
Joined: 04 Jun 2024
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 694
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 116
Posts: 694
Kudos: 226
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If you notice you actually took two different cases to make your point.

If X-E<M then Marcos won't make it but Elena also will NOT make it then.
Is that possible? No.
Because the stem says that one of them WILL make it.
So your case actually contradicts the stem itself.
truplayer256

This is not necessarily true regarding statement 1 being sufficient. What if the amount of remaining space was X and Elena had E amount of space where E < X, and X - E < M, then Marco will not make it. On the other hand, what if X - M < E, then Elena won't make it.
User avatar
BongBideshini
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 142
Own Kudos:
115
 [1]
Given Kudos: 78
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
GPA: 3.8
WE:Engineering (Government)
Products:
Posts: 142
Kudos: 115
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. Marco’s folder was smaller than Elena’s folder.

Therefore, only the smaller folder (Marco's) can be the one that fits.
Sufficient.

2. After Sofia’s folder was copied, the remaining free space would be less than the size of Elena’s folder.

This statement directly tells us Sofia + Elena cannot fit. So, it has to be Marco.
Sufficient.

Correct Answer: D

Bunuel
Elena, Marco, and Sofia each had one folder to copy to an external drive that was nearly full. From the sizes of the three folders, they knew that before any space was cleared, Sofia’s folder and exactly one of the other two folders could be copied to the drive, while the remaining folder would have to wait. Which folder could be copied along with Sofia’s folder before any space was cleared?

(1) Marco’s folder was smaller than Elena’s folder.
(2) After Sofia’s folder was copied, the remaining free space would be less than the size of Elena’s folder.

Experience GMAT Club Test Questions
Yes, you've landed on a GMAT Club Tests question
Craving more? Unlock our full suite of GMAT Club Tests here
Want to experience more? Get a taste of our tests with our free trial today
Rise to the challenge with GMAT Club Tests. Happy practicing!
User avatar
NidhiYad
Joined: 05 Dec 2025
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GPA: 8.6
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 39
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think the answer should be B because:

Statement 1: M<E,
Say the total space is 20Mb S occupied 10 Mb. 10 MB remaining. M is 9Mb and E is 10 Mb. In this case exactly one of M and E can occupy the space the other has to wait, but which one? we cannot say, because any one can. Insufficient!

Statement 2: Total - S <E
So in this case we know that E can for sure not fit. Question stem says S and exactly 1 other can, so we know it must be M. Sufficient!
User avatar
Adit_
Joined: 04 Jun 2024
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 694
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 116
Posts: 694
Kudos: 226
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You actually contradicted with the stem while stating it yourself. Exactly one of them CAN occupy the space meaning only either one of them can, each case you take. You can't take a case where you can have either one of them get in the queue as the stem states exactly one of them only can enter the space.
I understand how you probably interpreted it like, one of them enters and the other waits, which is what your case ideally does, except for the fact that it contradicts "exactly one" of them getting in.

Hope it helps!
NidhiYad
I think the answer should be B because:

Statement 1: M<E,
Say the total space is 20Mb S occupied 10 Mb. 10 MB remaining. M is 9Mb and E is 10 Mb. In this case exactly one of M and E can occupy the space the other has to wait, but which one? we cannot say, because any one can. Insufficient!

Statement 2: Total - S <E
So in this case we know that E can for sure not fit. Question stem says S and exactly 1 other can, so we know it must be M. Sufficient!
Moderators:
Math Expert
109785 posts
498 posts
212 posts