Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
13 Apr 2026, 19:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
30% (01:45) correct
70%
(01:43)
wrong
based on 60
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
During a two-session fundraising campaign, Maya and Noah each contacted some number of potential donors. By the end of the campaign, each had persuaded exactly 24 of those people to make a donation. Did Maya contact more people than Noah?
(1) In the first session, Noah persuaded a greater percentage of the people he contacted than Maya did.
(2) In the second session, Maya persuaded a lower percentage of the people she contacted than Noah did.
(1) In the first session, Noah persuaded a greater percentage of the people he contacted than Maya did.
(2) In the second session, Maya persuaded a lower percentage of the people she contacted than Noah did.
Experience GMAT Club Test Questions
Yes, you've landed on a GMAT Club Tests question
Craving more? Unlock our full suite of GMAT Club Tests here
Want to experience more? Get a taste of our tests with our free trial today
Rise to the challenge with GMAT Club Tests. Happy practicing!
21 Apr 2026, 02:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
GMAT Club Official Solution:
During a two-session fundraising campaign, Maya and Noah each contacted some number of potential donors. By the end of the campaign, each had persuaded exactly 24 of those people to make a donation. Did Maya contact more people than Noah?
We need to determine whether Maya contacted more people than Noah. Since both Maya and Noah persuaded exactly 24 people to donate, Maya contacted more people than Noah if and only if Maya’s overall success rate was lower than Noah’s overall success rate.
(1) In the first session, Noah persuaded a greater percentage of the people he contacted than Maya did.
This tells us only that Noah’s success rate was higher in the first session. That alone is not enough to determine whose overall success rate was lower. Not sufficient.
(2) In the second session, Maya persuaded a lower percentage of the people she contacted than Noah did.
This tells us only that Noah’s success rate was higher in the second session. That alone is not enough to determine whose overall success rate was lower. Not sufficient.
(1) + (2) Now we know that Noah’s success rate was higher in both sessions. But that still does not determine whose overall success rate was lower, because the two people may have contacted very different numbers of potential donors in the two sessions.
Yes case:
Maya: session 1 = 12 out of 100 (12%), session 2 = 12 out of 100 (12%), total = 24 out of 200
Noah: session 1 = 12 out of 24 (50%), session 2 = 12 out of 24 (50%), total = 24 out of 48
Both statements are satisfied, and Maya contacted more people than Noah.
To get a no answer: make Maya do most of her contacting in the session where her own success rate is higher, and make Noah do most of his contacting in the session where his own success rate is lower. That makes Maya’s overall success rate higher than Noah’s, so Maya must have contacted fewer people.
No case:
Maya: session 1 = 23 out of 24 (< 100%), session 2 = 1 out of 11 (< 10%), total = 24 out of 35
Noah: session 1 = 1 out of 1 (100%), session 2 = 23 out of 230 (10%), total = 24 out of 231
Both statements are satisfied, but Maya did not contact more people than Noah.
So even together, the statements are not sufficient.
Answer: E.
During a two-session fundraising campaign, Maya and Noah each contacted some number of potential donors. By the end of the campaign, each had persuaded exactly 24 of those people to make a donation. Did Maya contact more people than Noah?
We need to determine whether Maya contacted more people than Noah. Since both Maya and Noah persuaded exactly 24 people to donate, Maya contacted more people than Noah if and only if Maya’s overall success rate was lower than Noah’s overall success rate.
(1) In the first session, Noah persuaded a greater percentage of the people he contacted than Maya did.
This tells us only that Noah’s success rate was higher in the first session. That alone is not enough to determine whose overall success rate was lower. Not sufficient.
(2) In the second session, Maya persuaded a lower percentage of the people she contacted than Noah did.
This tells us only that Noah’s success rate was higher in the second session. That alone is not enough to determine whose overall success rate was lower. Not sufficient.
(1) + (2) Now we know that Noah’s success rate was higher in both sessions. But that still does not determine whose overall success rate was lower, because the two people may have contacted very different numbers of potential donors in the two sessions.
Yes case:
Maya: session 1 = 12 out of 100 (12%), session 2 = 12 out of 100 (12%), total = 24 out of 200
Noah: session 1 = 12 out of 24 (50%), session 2 = 12 out of 24 (50%), total = 24 out of 48
Both statements are satisfied, and Maya contacted more people than Noah.
To get a no answer: make Maya do most of her contacting in the session where her own success rate is higher, and make Noah do most of his contacting in the session where his own success rate is lower. That makes Maya’s overall success rate higher than Noah’s, so Maya must have contacted fewer people.
No case:
Maya: session 1 = 23 out of 24 (< 100%), session 2 = 1 out of 11 (< 10%), total = 24 out of 35
Noah: session 1 = 1 out of 1 (100%), session 2 = 23 out of 230 (10%), total = 24 out of 231
Both statements are satisfied, but Maya did not contact more people than Noah.
So even together, the statements are not sufficient.
Answer: E.
General Discussion
13 Apr 2026, 22:48
Kudos
Bookmarks
Both statements state that Noah persuaded a great percent of people in the individual sessions each and thus Maya did contact more people than Noah.
Combining both, SUFFICIENT.
Answer: Option C
Combining both, SUFFICIENT.
Answer: Option C
Bunuel
