Hi Experts,
I have my GMAT scheduled on 21st November. I needed your help in assessing my progress on my GMAT Preparations. I have prepped for GMAT before and hence I have taken first 4 GMAT Prep test before. I bought the 2 new Tests and I have taken all the 6 Full GMAT Prep exams under controlled conditions simulating the actual GMAT conditions mostly taken at home, with some distractions/ noise testing my concentration levels.
GMAT Prep 1 (repeat): 750 (Q50, V41)
GMAT Prep 2 (repeat): 740 (Q50, V40)
GMAT Prep 3 (repeat): 730 (Q49, V41)
GMAT Prep 4 (repeat): 750 (Q50, V41)
GMAT Prep 5 (new): 730 (Q49, V40)
GMAT Prep 6 (new/latest): 700 (Q49, V35) [Taken Today]
I have taken few
MGMAT TESTs and scored: 700, 670, 730. This was a 2 weeks ago. I gave up on them as the Quant was way too difficult for my liking. I wanted to restrict my self to only GMAT Official questions.
The recent two tests were GMAT Prep 1 (750) and GMAT Prep 6 (700). Given that exam is only 5 days away, I can't do much but to analyze the mistakes and any trends which I might have missed. The last test GMAT Prep 6, which I took today, was kinda a dampener, as I scored only 700. 700 is not a bad score, but I was looking to score a lot more and was looking to get a consistent 740+ score. However, I look for your guidance at this stage. I am confident to score a 700 or more, but there is a small element of doubt creeping in (which should not be the case). I felt the GMAT Prep 6 exam algorithm worked out weirdly. With just 5 wrong out of 37 questions, I got a 49. That sounds pretty strict scoring behind the scene. Additionally, 11 wrong (1q wrong in top 10) in verbal led to 35. Something is not right here. Some re-calibration of scoring algorithm must have taken place behind the scenes.
GMAT Prep scoring algorithm is way too complicated but there are variations seen in my attempted scores. Its difficult to assess which score is going to be closer to the Actual Score. Something tells me to average all scores and that is what my score going to be. ha

Help please.
Thanks,
Vaibhav.