Unlike the many winter greens that have tough leaves and thus require a lengthy cooking time, those of escarole need little or no cooking.
A. many winter greens that have tough leaves and thus require a lengthy cooking time, those of escarole need
B. many winter greens that have tough leaves and thus require a lengthy cooking time, escarole needs
C. tough leaves of many winter greens and that they require for a lengthy cooking time, escarole needs
D. tough leaves of many winter greens and the requirement that they have a lengthy cooking time, those of escarole need
E. lengthy cooking time required by the many winter greens with tough leaves, escarole needs
STEP 1:
What is this sentence trying to tell me?
After 1st reading I get: Those need little or no cooking and whatever need little or no cooking is unlike something else.
STEP 2: What is modifying, pardon the pun, what and how does the underlined part relate to the original sentence?
that ... modifies greens and
of escarole modifies those.
STEP 3: What do I think is wrong with the sentence based on what I know?
I have no idea what those is supposed to refer to; how do I fix this?-btw D is out because it repeats the aforementioned mistake.
STEP 4: Split and eliminate
only by applying grammar rules you know, at least until you run out of options (:
At this point we only have B C and E left
E is illogical- E compares
time to
escarole C compares
leaves to
escarole- Well escarole has leaves.
The following example better illustrates my point; John, a man, is better than all men.(How can John be better than himself?)
STEP 5:
Read original sentence, replacing the underlined part with your answer.