My brain is not a linear optimizer, so sometimes it is hard for me to just pick apart the question stem and solve using algebra.
I don't know who it was, but I really appreciated learning that just using algebra to solve inequalities can work in many problems.
Obviously, sometimes intuition is more powerful, but for this question, this approach helped me. These questions feel like a game to me now.
We are given that \((a + b) > (c + d)\)
(1) \(a < (c + d)\)
This means that
\((a + b) > (c + d) > a \)
OR
\(c + d - b < a < (c + d)\)
From here, there is no way to isolate a and c. So, I'd be highly suspicious.
Furthermore, we don't know what d is. Having \(d\) would help.
(2) \(b < d\)
Using the same line of thinking. I can just plug in the inequalities.
I can either isolate \(b\)
\(c + d - a < b < d\) ====== > \(c + d - a < d\)
OR I can isolate d
\(b < d < a + b - c\) ====== > \(b < a + b - c\)
Either one simplifies down to our target, so 2 is sufficient alone.
\(c < a\)