Last visit was: 14 May 2025, 23:37 It is currently 14 May 2025, 23:37
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
summer101
Joined: 06 Jun 2012
Last visit: 16 Jun 2014
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
1,028
 [9]
Given Kudos: 37
Posts: 106
Kudos: 1,028
 [9]
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Zarrolou
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Last visit: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 848
Own Kudos:
5,051
 [3]
Given Kudos: 219
Status:Far, far away!
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Posts: 848
Kudos: 5,051
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Aniketa
Joined: 15 Mar 2013
Last visit: 21 Dec 2013
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT Date: 08-07-2013
GPA: 3.33
WE:Consulting (Energy)
Posts: 21
Kudos: 51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BeckyRobinsonTPR
User avatar
Princeton Review Representative
Joined: 17 Jun 2013
Last visit: 19 May 2014
Posts: 147
Own Kudos:
Posts: 147
Kudos: 981
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
On Weaken questions you are sometimes looking for a shift in the author's words. The original argument discusses the rise in unemployment and Z responds with wording discussing the level of unemployment. This shift in language opens up an opportunity for assumptions - assuming that both words are the same.

Thus D shows the assumption between the level of unemployment and the rise in unemployment and therefore weakens the article.
User avatar
cumulonimbus
Joined: 14 Nov 2011
Last visit: 10 Feb 2023
Posts: 98
Own Kudos:
58
 [1]
Given Kudos: 102
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.61
WE:Consulting (Manufacturing)
Posts: 98
Kudos: 58
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Zarrolou
W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economic problem; it will undoubtedly cost the majority party votes in the coming elections.
Z: I disagree. Statistics for the past 40 years show that there is no significant relationship between the prevailing level of employment and political gains or losses by the party that happens to be in the majority at election time.

W and Z do not talk about the same thing: W cites the rise of the level of unemployment, but Z replies by citing the level of employment overall.
W cites a trend, W cites an overall number not related to a rise/fall of the level itself => they are talking about two different things.

D. Z's statistics focus on level of unemployment, rather than direction of change
is correct

Hi,
What does "direction of change mean" ?
User avatar
jaituteja
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Last visit: 16 Jan 2015
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 41
Posts: 79
Kudos: 172
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
summer101
W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economic problem; it will undoubtedly cost the majority party votes in the coming elections.
Z: I disagree. Statistics for the past 40 years show that there is no significant relationship between the prevailing level of employment and political gains or losses by the party that happens to be in the majority at election time.

Which of the following most seriously weakens the force of Z's counterargument?

A. Z fails to cite any actual figures
B. Z's decision to consider a time span of 40 years seem arbitrary
C. Z relies on conventional criteria for the notion of a significant relationship
D. Z's statistics focus on level of unemployment, rather than direction of change
E. Z assumes that there is no connection between economic and political trends


Can someone post the explanation for option C...??
User avatar
blueseas
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Last visit: 15 Jan 2019
Posts: 577
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 577
Kudos: 4,448
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
cumulonimbus
Zarrolou
W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economic problem; it will undoubtedly cost the majority party votes in the coming elections.
Z: I disagree. Statistics for the past 40 years show that there is no significant relationship between the prevailing level of employment and political gains or losses by the party that happens to be in the majority at election time.

W and Z do not talk about the same thing: W cites the rise of the level of unemployment, but Z replies by citing the level of employment overall.
W cites a trend, W cites an overall number not related to a rise/fall of the level itself => they are talking about two different things.

D. Z's statistics focus on level of unemployment, rather than direction of change
is correct

Hi,
What does "direction of change mean" ?

hi,

actually it means:
Z's statistics focus on level of unemployment, rather than direction of change in unemployment.
W==>He is focussing on rapid RISE (CHANGE ) in employment.
Z==>He is focussing on on current level of unemployment and not the CHANGE (RISE)IN EMPLOYMENT.

hope it helps
User avatar
blueseas
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Last visit: 15 Jan 2019
Posts: 577
Own Kudos:
4,448
 [1]
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 577
Kudos: 4,448
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jaituteja

Can someone post the explanation for option C...??

Hi,
actually conventional means: what is typical and ordinary and that which follows accepted standards of behavior or taste.

now C says:
C. Z relies on conventional criteria for the notion of a significant relationship====>means whatever Z is thinking is typical and normal ..and is accepted by all.....but this is not the case...it is not typically accepted.....rather Z has collected data of last 40 years and he himself came to the conclusion.,so no consensus is their....hence that is why this wrong..
hope it helps.

SKM
avatar
abhinav11
Joined: 04 Sep 2012
Last visit: 02 Apr 2016
Posts: 115
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
very good Explanation by Zarrolous , I chose C at first but after reading the explanations I could see how wrong m y approach is :| :oops:
User avatar
cumulonimbus
Joined: 14 Nov 2011
Last visit: 10 Feb 2023
Posts: 98
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 102
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.61
WE:Consulting (Manufacturing)
Posts: 98
Kudos: 58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shaileshmishra
cumulonimbus
Zarrolou
W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economic problem; it will undoubtedly cost the majority party votes in the coming elections.
Z: I disagree. Statistics for the past 40 years show that there is no significant relationship between the prevailing level of employment and political gains or losses by the party that happens to be in the majority at election time.

W and Z do not talk about the same thing: W cites the rise of the level of unemployment, but Z replies by citing the level of employment overall.
W cites a trend, W cites an overall number not related to a rise/fall of the level itself => they are talking about two different things.

D. Z's statistics focus on level of unemployment, rather than direction of change
is correct

Hi,
What does "direction of change mean" ?

hi,

actually it means:
Z's statistics focus on level of unemployment, rather than direction of change in unemployment.
W==>He is focussing on rapid RISE (CHANGE ) in employment.
Z==>He is focussing on on current level of unemployment and not the CHANGE (RISE)IN EMPLOYMENT.

hope it helps

Hi,
Sorry I didn't get you.
Isn't W - talking about unemployment.
User avatar
Zarrolou
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Last visit: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 848
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 219
Status:Far, far away!
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Posts: 848
Kudos: 5,051
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
cumulonimbus
Hi,
Sorry I didn't get you.
Isn't W - talking about unemployment.

Nope, they use similar words, but what they say is very different.

W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economic problem; it will undoubtedly cost the majority party votes in the coming elections.
Z: I disagree. Statistics for the past 40 years show that there is no significant relationship between the prevailing level of employment and political gains or losses by the party that happens to be in the majority at election time.

W talks about the rise like: +4%
Z talks about the number like: 90%

The first cites a TREND (+ something ), the second cites a "steady" number.
Hope it's clear
User avatar
blueseas
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Last visit: 15 Jan 2019
Posts: 577
Own Kudos:
4,448
 [1]
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 577
Kudos: 4,448
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
cumulonimbus

Hi,
Sorry I didn't get you.
Isn't W - talking about unemployment.

my bad ...that was a typo.

let me elaborate again.
first of all we must know employment rate unemployment are complementary.
means you can say either : employment is increasing or unemplyment is decreasing
and employment is decreasing or unemployment is increasing.


so now argument:
hi,

actually it means:
Z's statistics focus on level of unemployment, rather than direction of change in unemployment.
or you can rephrase this==>Z's statistics focus on level of employment, rather than direction of change in employment.

W==>He is focussing on rapid RISE (CHANGE ) in unemployment.
Z==>He is focussing on current level of unemployment and not the CHANGE IN UNEMPLOYMENT.
OR YOU CAN REPHRASE IT AS
He is focussing on current level of employment and not the CHANGE IN EMPLOYMENT

hope it helps
User avatar
chesstitans
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 Nov 2019
Posts: 991
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
Posts: 991
Kudos: 1,882
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
what is the source of this question?
I cannot locate the exact source of this question even though I have used google.

Using POE, test takers can choose D.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,292
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,292
Kudos: 938
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7304 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts