Kaplan Official Soultion
Official Answer - A
If a stimulus offers proper logic, so must its parallel example.The logic might be easier to see if you lay it out like so:
Good things cause no harm.
Wealth causes harm.
Therefore, wealth is not a good thing.That’s a proper and simple syllogism, one directly echoed by (A), which you can also rearrange:
Chess club members do not love to golf.
Alex loves to golf.
Therefore, Alex is not in the chess club.Both of these hold up well under logical scrutiny.
(B) The structure deviates first of all because it’s proceeding to a positive conclusion, not a negative one; second, it deviates because it includes more pieces of evidence than does the stimulus; and third, it deviates because there’s a shift (from “happy people” to “contented babies”) that the stimulus doesn’t contain.
(C) The conclusion is parallel, but the evidence here is simply that a negative (unbearable pollution) outweighs a possible positive (improved economy). That’s not how the wealth argument runs.
(D) Although the stimulus and (A) are proper logic, (D) commits a logical flaw, and “Most dachshunds hunt poorly” is the culprit. Because it leaves open the possibility that Sarah’s dog is one of a minority of dachshunds that don’t hunt poorly, (D) is wrong in concluding so forcefully that her dog isn’t a dachshund. A faulty logic choice cannot parallel a proper-logic stimulus. (Note that if the stimulus’s conclusion read “Most good things cause no harm,” (D) would be parallel and correct.)
(E) The right answer has to have a strong conclusion that’s parallel to “Wealth is not a good thing.” The conclusion “it is surprising that…” just won’t cut it.
Gladiator59
Wealth is not a good thing, for good things cause no harm at all, yet wealth is often harmful to people.
Which one of the following arguments is most similar in its pattern of reasoning to the argument
above?
(A) Alex loves to golf, and no one in the chess club loves to golf. It follows that Alex is not in the chess club.
(B) Isabella must be a contented baby. She smiles a great deal and hardly ever cries, like all happy people.
(C) Growth in industry is not a good thing for our town. Although the economy might improve, the pollution would be unbearable.
(D) Sarah’s dog is not a dachshund, for he hunts very well, and most dachshunds hunt poorly.
(E) There is usually more traffic at this time of day unless it is a holiday. But since today is not a holiday, it is surprising that there is so little traffic.