Last visit was: 10 Jul 2025, 19:37 It is currently 10 Jul 2025, 19:37
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
605-655 Level|   Science|   Short Passage|                           
avatar
shabuzen102
Joined: 11 Aug 2019
Last visit: 24 Jul 2020
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111
Posts: 68
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 10 July 2025
Posts: 7,349
Own Kudos:
68,497
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,964
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,349
Kudos: 68,497
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
suminha
Joined: 03 Feb 2020
Last visit: 02 Jan 2025
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 242
Location: Korea, Republic of
Posts: 111
Kudos: 423
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bM22
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2016
Last visit: 08 May 2024
Posts: 741
Own Kudos:
764
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,316
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 741
Kudos: 764
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
suminha
Can someone break down this passage please ?

Posted from my mobile device


Hi suminha,

Let me know if this helps.

P1: The first para discusses about the asteroid collisions and that some collisions cause asteroid to spin faster, where as some slow it down. Asteroid can be classified in to 2 types: rubber piles, and monoliths. Rubber piles asteroids dont have a tail,so any loose end present that spins faster than once every few hours, flies apart. Researchers have discovered that all asteroids with a possible exception of 5 (smaller than 200 meters) obey strict rotation.

P2: Author mentions that there is evident conclusion that asteroids larger than 200 meters are multicomponent structures or rubble piles. Collisions can blast larger asteroids to smaller pieces and each of the smaller piece then move slower than their mutual escape velocity. Thus if the smaller pieces moved faster than their combined escape velocity, larger asteroid would blast, but of they move slower, it would not happen, as they would by reassmebled by gravity. Author concludes by stating that all small asteroids should be monolithics.


Thanks.
User avatar
suminha
Joined: 03 Feb 2020
Last visit: 02 Jan 2025
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
423
 [2]
Given Kudos: 242
Location: Korea, Republic of
Posts: 111
Kudos: 423
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bm2201
suminha
Can someone break down this passage please ?

Posted from my mobile device


Hi suminha,

Let me know if this helps.

P1: The first para discusses about the asteroid collisions and that some collisions cause asteroid to spin faster, where as some slow it down. Asteroid can be classified in to 2 types: rubber piles, and monoliths. Rubber piles asteroids dont have a tail,so any loose end present that spins faster than once every few hours, flies apart. Researchers have discovered that all asteroids with a possible exception of 5 (smaller than 200 meters) obey strict rotation.

P2: Author mentions that there is evident conclusion that asteroids larger than 200 meters are multicomponent structures or rubble piles. Collisions can blast larger asteroids to smaller pieces and each of the smaller piece then move slower than their mutual escape velocity. Thus if the smaller pieces moved faster than their combined escape velocity, larger asteroid would blast, but of they move slower, it would not happen, as they would by reassmebled by gravity. Author concludes by stating that all small asteroids should be monolithics.


Thanks.


Thank you BM2201 !

It helped me to re-think this passage and found the problem of my process of thinking.

I think that this RC is especially hard, since it is tricky to identify Main Idea and Supporting Idea.
Normally I find two different objects that the author claims, and I contrast them and paraphrase the passage into simpler sentences.
But in this context, paraphrasing was difficult because there is over 3 sections to contrast.
I attach how I broke down this passage.
In the attachment, the green sentences are my process of thinking, and the blue ones are synonyms for paraphrasing.
If I made any mistake, or I fails to consider something, I'm all ears to you.

Thank you again !
Attachments

IMG_0189.JPG
IMG_0189.JPG [ 149.4 KiB | Viewed 9506 times ]

IMG_0190.JPG
IMG_0190.JPG [ 123.96 KiB | Viewed 9463 times ]

IMG_0191.JPG
IMG_0191.JPG [ 99.34 KiB | Viewed 9492 times ]

avatar
28958601189
Joined: 29 Apr 2019
Last visit: 09 Aug 2023
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 21
Posts: 6
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja and others, what is good timing on a passage this length (short) and difficulty?

Is managing ~1:40 per question with 75%+ accuracy sufficient for 720+ RC?

Thanks a lot
avatar
parthgohel
Joined: 08 Oct 2017
Last visit: 17 Jul 2022
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Location: India
WE:Project Management (Non-Profit and Government)
Posts: 13
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Experts

In the last 2 sentences of 1st Para,

Researchers discovered that all asteroids obey strict limit on rotation rates except for 5 observed asteroids. All these 5 asteroids are less than 200 meters in diameter.

what does the phrase after comma 'with an abrupt cutoff for asteroids larger than that.' means?
avatar
panwaryamini
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 29 Dec 2018
Last visit: 23 Jun 2021
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Location: India
Schools: Mannheim  (A)
Schools: Mannheim  (A)
Posts: 5
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
Could you please explain Q3?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 10 July 2025
Posts: 7,349
Own Kudos:
68,497
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,964
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,349
Kudos: 68,497
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
28958601189
GMATNinja and others, what is good timing on a passage this length (short) and difficulty?

Is managing ~1:40 per question with 75%+ accuracy sufficient for 720+ RC?

Thanks a lot
It's really hard to extrapolate an RC score from this kind of information. For one thing, the difficulty level of the exact questions you miss will play into your score, and it's possible to have a relatively easy question on a tough passage. On the timing front, you're below the average time available for verbal section questions, which is great! But, of course, your overall time management depends on your CR and SC timing as well. If you take forever on CR/SC and don't see the last RC passage, then of course your RC score is going to be terrible even though your RC timing is fine.

The best way to assess your time management on the verbal section is to take an official practice test at mba.com, or a "fake test" using mba.com questions (see this video or this post for instructions to set this up).

I hope that helps a bit!
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 10 July 2025
Posts: 7,349
Own Kudos:
68,497
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,964
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,349
Kudos: 68,497
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
parthgohel
Hi Experts

In the last 2 sentences of 1st Para,

Researchers discovered that all asteroids obey strict limit on rotation rates except for 5 observed asteroids. All these 5 asteroids are less than 200 meters in diameter.

what does the phrase after comma 'with an abrupt cutoff for asteroids larger than that.' means?
Here’s the relevant portion of the passage:

    Researchers have discovered that all but five observed asteroids obey a strict limit on rate of rotation. The exceptions are all smaller than 200 meters in diameter, with an abrupt cutoff for asteroids larger than that.

The author first lays out that the rate at which asteroids rotate is limited for all but five asteroids, each of which is smaller than 200 meters in diameter. He/she goes on to detail that the exceptions cut off for asteroids larger than that. So in other words, all asteroids larger than 200 meters in diameter obey the strict limit on rate of rotation.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 10 July 2025
Posts: 7,349
Own Kudos:
68,497
 [7]
Given Kudos: 1,964
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,349
Kudos: 68,497
 [7]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 3


panwaryamini
GMATNinja
Could you please explain Q3?
Quote:
According to the passage, which of the following is a prediction that is based on the strength of the gravitational attraction of small asteroids?
The question asks about a prediction derived from the strength of the gravitational attraction of small asteroids. The passage talks about this gravitational attraction in the final sentence. It says:

    Conversely, most small asteroids should be monolithic, because impact fragments easily escape their feeble gravity.

So, small asteroids have weak gravity. As a result, impact fragments easily escape, and most small asteroids should be monolithic. With that in mind, let’s take a look at the answer choices.

Quote:
(A) Small asteroids will be few in number.
Nowhere in the passage does the author suggest that small asteroids are few in number or that large asteroids are more common. Moreover, the relative scarcity of different sizes of asteroids is not connected to the gravitational pull of these asteroids. Eliminate (A).

Quote:
(B) Small asteroids will be monoliths.
As we identified above, the last sentence of the passage indicates that the weak gravitational pull of small asteroids will likely ensure that most small asteroids are monoliths. This is exactly what (B) says. Let’s keep (B).

Quote:
(C) Small asteroids will collide with other asteroids very rarely.
In the second to last sentence of the passage, the author notes that “collisions among asteroids are relatively frequent.” He/she never suggests that small asteroids rarely collide with other asteroids. Eliminate (C).

Quote:
(D) Most small asteroids will have very fast rotation rates.
(D) is tempting. The passage does seem to suggest that five small asteroids rotate faster than other asteroids. Perhaps, we could infer that small asteroids have faster rotation rates. But even that is a leap, and it is definitely not connected to the gravitational pull of small asteroids. Eliminate (D).

Quote:
(E) Almost no small asteroids will have very slow rotation rates.
While the passage suggests that five small asteroids have very fast rotation rates, it does not indicate that only a few small asteroids have slow rotation rates. In fact, it’s possible that most other small asteroids have slow rotation rates. And the rotation rate of these asteroids is not connected to their gravitational pull. Eliminate (E).

(B) is the only answer choice remaining, and it is correct.

I hope that helps!
avatar
randarth
Joined: 21 Mar 2020
Last visit: 24 Jul 2022
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
5
 [1]
Given Kudos: 27
Posts: 19
Kudos: 5
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
Asad
Quote:
When asteroids collide, some collisions cause an asteroid to spin faster; others slow it down. If asteroids are all monoliths—single rocks—undergoing random collisions, a graph of their rotation rates should show a bell-shaped distribution with statistical “tails” of very fast and very slow rotators. If asteroids are rubble piles, however, the tail representing the very fast rotators would be missing, because any loose aggregate spinning faster than once every few hours (depending on the asteroid’s bulk density) would fly apart. Researchers have discovered that all but five observed asteroids obey a strict limit on rate of rotation. The exceptions are all smaller than 200 meters in diameter, with an abrupt cutoff for asteroids larger than that.

(Book Question: 537 RC00524-02)
The passage implies which of the following about the five asteroids mentioned in line 12?

(A) Their rotation rates are approximately the same.
(B) They have undergone approximately the same number of collisions.
(C) They are monoliths.
(D) They are composed of fragments that have escaped the gravity of larger asteroids.
(E) They were detected only recently.
Hi
I am confused in this question. Could you share insights, please?
Here, the feature of five observed asteroids are:
1/ They don't obey a strict limit on rate of rotation.
2/ They're all SMALLER THAN 200 meters in diameter.
So, if this is the case, HOW do we know that five observed asteroids are "monoliths"?
Thanks__
Earlier in the passage, the author sets up a comparison between monoliths and "rubble piles":

  • A graph of monolith rotation rates would be bell-shaped, with "tails" of both very fast and very slow rotators.
  • A graph of rubble pile rotation rates, on the other hand, would NOT have a "tail" for very fast rotators. This is because any rubble pile rotating that quickly would fly apart.

As you pointed out, the five observed asteroids do not "obey a strict limit on rate of rotation." In other words, these five asteroids are rotating faster than other asteroids. On a graph, they would be in the "tail" representing very fast rotation.

Based on the earlier comparison we can infer that these five asteroids must be monoliths, because any rubble pile rotating that quickly would fly apart. (C) is the correct answer to question #1.

I hope that helps!

Hello! I am still a little confused on this answer. Since the five asteroids are exceptions to the rule, wouldn't they rather be a part of the rubble with speeds higher than the usual speed?
Since the answer suggests them to be monolith, and monolith asteroids can have any speed (Since the speed distribution for monoliths is a bell curve), they are no longer exceptions to the rule right?
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 10 July 2025
Posts: 7,349
Own Kudos:
68,497
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,964
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,349
Kudos: 68,497
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
randarth
GMATNinja
Asad
Hi
I am confused in this question. Could you share insights, please?
Here, the feature of five observed asteroids are:
1/ They don't obey a strict limit on rate of rotation.
2/ They're all SMALLER THAN 200 meters in diameter.
So, if this is the case, HOW do we know that five observed asteroids are "monoliths"?
Thanks__
Earlier in the passage, the author sets up a comparison between monoliths and "rubble piles":

  • A graph of monolith rotation rates would be bell-shaped, with "tails" of both very fast and very slow rotators.
  • A graph of rubble pile rotation rates, on the other hand, would NOT have a "tail" for very fast rotators. This is because any rubble pile rotating that quickly would fly apart.

As you pointed out, the five observed asteroids do not "obey a strict limit on rate of rotation." In other words, these five asteroids are rotating faster than other asteroids. On a graph, they would be in the "tail" representing very fast rotation.

Based on the earlier comparison we can infer that these five asteroids must be monoliths, because any rubble pile rotating that quickly would fly apart. (C) is the correct answer to question #1.

I hope that helps!

Hello! I am still a little confused on this answer. Since the five asteroids are exceptions to the rule, wouldn't they rather be a part of the rubble with speeds higher than the usual speed?
Since the answer suggests them to be monolith, and monolith asteroids can have any speed (Since the speed distribution for monoliths is a bell curve), they are no longer exceptions to the rule right?
GMATNinja
The “rule” found in the passage is that MOST of the observed asteroids obey a strict limit on their rate of rotation. So the rule isn't about rubble piles or monoliths. Instead, it’s a rule that observed asteroids, in general, tend to follow.

Then, the passage indicates that five asteroids are exceptions among observed asteroids, not among rubble piles. This means that the five asteroids are unique among other asteroids, not unique among rubble piles or monoliths. Then, the passage goes on to explain that the five asteroids can exceed the typical rate of rotation limit because they are monoliths.

I hope that helps!
avatar
psls
Joined: 27 Jan 2021
Last visit: 12 Dec 2023
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 131
Posts: 33
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi GMATNinja

While reading, I got confused a bit about clause below.
Quote:
Researchers have discovered that all but five observed asteroids obey a strict limit on rate of rotation.

At first, I think the five observed asteroids DO obey a strict limit on RoR.
But after reading many comments, I just found that it should be
Quote:
Researchers have discovered that all obey a strict limit on rate of rotation, but five observed asteroids (do not).

1. Is my understanding correct?
2. How can I prevent this mistake in the future? Should I focus on its meaning?
User avatar
Sneha2021
Joined: 20 Dec 2020
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 319
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 523
Location: India
Posts: 319
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
VeritasKarishma
I understood why E is correct. Can you help to understand why B is incorrect?
The author of the passage mentions “escape velocity” (see line 22) in order to help explain which of the following?
(B) The speed with which impact fragments reassemble when they do not escape an asteroid’s gravitational attraction after a collision
Relevant line - A collision can blast a large asteroid to bits, but after the collision those bits will usually move slower than their mutual escape velocity. Over several hours, gravity will reassemble all but the fastest pieces into a rubble pile
Acc to passage, the speed at which those bits move is compared with the escape velocity. Why can't we say that escape velocity is used to explain/"compare" the speed with which those fragments reassemble after a collision.
User avatar
GMATCoachBen
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 424
Own Kudos:
2,264
 [1]
Given Kudos: 206
Status:Professional GMAT Trainer
Affiliations: GMAT Coach
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V44
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V44
GMAT 4: 770 Q50 V45 (Online)
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Posts: 424
Kudos: 2,264
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sneha2021
GMATNinja
VeritasKarishma
I understood why E is correct. Can you help to understand why B is incorrect?
The author of the passage mentions “escape velocity” (see line 22) in order to help explain which of the following?
(B) The speed with which impact fragments reassemble when they do not escape an asteroid’s gravitational attraction after a collision
Relevant line - A collision can blast a large asteroid to bits, but after the collision those bits will usually move slower than their mutual escape velocity. Over several hours, gravity will reassemble all but the fastest pieces into a rubble pile
Acc to passage, the speed at which those bits move is compared with the escape velocity. Why can't we say that escape velocity is used to explain/"compare" the speed with which those fragments reassemble after a collision.
Sneha2021, good question! B is indeed very tempting (one of the hardest official traps, with 48% choosing it).

B has several correct elements, but we must make sure that every part of the answer choice is correct.

The author's point in mentioning "those bits will usually move slower than their mutual escape velocity" is that the bits cannot escape, and therefore the pieces reassemble, and therefore the large asteroids persist. As you noted, therefore E is correct: "The tendency for large asteroids to persist after collisions."

The problem with B is that it focuses on "the SPEED with which impact fragments reassemble". The author does not attempt to explain the SPEED of reassembling; rather, the author explains that the pieces DO reassemble, to support the author's larger conclusion, 1 sentence above: "The evident conclusion—that asteroids larger than 200 meters across are multicomponent structures or rubble piles — agrees with recent computer modeling of collisions...". Another similar conclusion is stated, 2 sentences below: "Because collisions among asteroids are relatively frequent, most large bodies have already suffered this fate."
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,101
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,101
Kudos: 74,247
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sneha2021
GMATNinja
VeritasKarishma
I understood why E is correct. Can you help to understand why B is incorrect?
The author of the passage mentions “escape velocity” (see line 22) in order to help explain which of the following?
(B) The speed with which impact fragments reassemble when they do not escape an asteroid’s gravitational attraction after a collision
Relevant line - A collision can blast a large asteroid to bits, but after the collision those bits will usually move slower than their mutual escape velocity. Over several hours, gravity will reassemble all but the fastest pieces into a rubble pile
Acc to passage, the speed at which those bits move is compared with the escape velocity. Why can't we say that escape velocity is used to explain/"compare" the speed with which those fragments reassemble after a collision.

Incorrect options will sometimes look relevant so we need to read the passage very carefully.

Question: Escape velocity is mentioned to explain what?

The evident conclusion—that asteroids larger than 200 meters across are multicomponent structures or rubble piles—agrees with recent computer modeling of collisions, which also finds a transition at that diameter. A collision can blast a large asteroid to bits, but after the collision those bits will usually move slower than their mutual escape velocity. Over several hours, gravity will reassemble all but the fastest pieces into a rubble pile. Because collisions among asteroids are relatively frequent, most large bodies have already suffered this fate.

What do we gather from this?
Large asteroids are usually rubble piles. When collision happens, they are blasted into bits but those bits are slower than their mutual escape velocity (so they do not fly far away from each other). Hence they reassemble back into one big mass of rubble (their mutual gravity pulls them together). Most collisions happens frequently, most big asteroids have collided and reformed into big piles of rubble.


Why did they mention escape velocity? To explain you why the small pieces don't fly away and why they reassemble.

The author of the passage mentions “escape velocity” (see line 22) in order to help explain which of the following?

(A) The tendency for asteroids to become smaller rather than larger over time
(B) The speed with which impact fragments reassemble when they do not escape an asteroid’s gravitational attraction after a collision

Escape velocity does not explain at what speed the fragments reassemble. We know it takes them a few hours but why, we don't know. Escape velocity doesn't explain. Escape velocity explains why they reassemble and not fly away.

(C) The frequency with which collisions among asteroids occur
(D) The rotation rates of asteroids smaller than 200 meters in diameter
(E) The tendency for large asteroids to persist after collisions

Correct. It explains why large asteroids remain large (because even after collision, they reassemble because the speeds of their bits are slower than escape velocity).

Answer (E)
User avatar
Transponster
Joined: 06 Mar 2018
Last visit: 12 Jan 2024
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 59
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 46
Kudos: 41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I got question 4 right when I was attempting the passage under timed environment. Now when I am re-evaluating, I can quickly eliminate options B, C, and D, but I am finding it harder to eliminate option A. GMATNinja and other experts, can someone please help with this?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 10 July 2025
Posts: 7,349
Own Kudos:
68,497
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,964
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,349
Kudos: 68,497
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 4


Transponster
I got question 4 right when I was attempting the passage under timed environment. Now when I am re-evaluating, I can quickly eliminate options B, C, and D, but I am finding it harder to eliminate option A. GMATNinja and other experts, can someone please help with this?
Take another look at the section in question:
Quote:
A collision can blast a large asteroid to bits, but after the collision those bits will usually move slower than their mutual escape velocity. Over several hours, gravity will reassemble all but the fastest pieces into a rubble pile.
The key thing here is that MOST pieces of the asteroid get reassembled back together. In other words, the author mentions "escape velocity" to explain how these large asteroids still exist -- gravity pulls them back together.

(A) says almost the opposite:
Quote:
(A) The tendency for asteroids to become smaller rather than larger over time

Sure, these asteroids must become a bit smaller when a few pieces manage to escape. However, the reason why the author brings up escape velocity is to explain why big asteroids stick together, NOT to focus on the small pieces that do escape. Most pieces DON'T escape, which explains why large asteroids persist.

(A) is out, and (E) is the correct answer to question 4.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 09 Jul 2025
Posts: 15,828
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,082
GPA: 3.62
Posts: 15,828
Kudos: 46,346
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

The passage implies which of the following about the five asteroids mentioned in line 12?

Difficulty Level: 700

Explanation

Inference

In line 12, five observed asteroids, refers to the five asteroids whose rotation rates are exceptions to the strict limit on the rate of rotation found in all other observed asteroids. These five asteroids all have diameters smaller than 200 meters. The passage indicates that if asteroids were all monoliths—that is, single rocks—then their rotation rates would form a bell curve when graphed, but if asteroids were piles of rubble, the tail of the bell curve indicating very fast rotation rates would be missing. Among asteroids larger than 200 meters, this tail is missing, and only the five asteroids described as exceptions have rotation rates falling at the very high end of the bell curve.

A. All that the passage states about the rotation rates of these five asteroids is that they do not obey a strict limit. The passage does not rule out that their rates of rotation are significantly different from one another.

B. According to the passage, frequent collisions occur among asteroids. But the passage does not suggest that asteroids that are of similar sizes, or that have particularly high rotation rates, will be similar in terms of the number of collisions that they have undergone to reach those distinctive states.

C. Correct. The second paragraph states that most small asteroids should be monolithic, and the five observed asteroids are all smaller than 200 meters in diameter.

D. The five asteroids are most likely not composed of fragments because, as the passage states, small asteroids should be monoliths.

E. The passage notes that researchers have observed these five asteroids, along with others, but it does not indicate when these asteroids were originally detected.

The correct answer is C.
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
15828 posts