GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 16 Oct 2019, 12:57

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, Carl Stokes won the el

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 232
When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, Carl Stokes won the el  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 09 Nov 2018, 00:59
1
3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

56% (01:00) correct 44% (01:05) wrong based on 352 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, Carl Stokes won the election, proving that an African American candidate can be elected in a city in which African Americans constitute a minority of the population.


(A) When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968,

(B) He ran for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, and

(C) Running, in 1968, for mayor of Cleveland,

(D) When he ran for mayor of Cleveland in 1968,

(E) In 1968 he had run for mayor of Cleveland, and

Originally posted by pb_india on 08 Apr 2005, 03:19.
Last edited by Bunuel on 09 Nov 2018, 00:59, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 941
Location: Taiwan
Re: When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, Carl Stokes won the el  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2005, 10:55
pb_india wrote:
When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, Carl Stokes won the election, proving that an African American candidate can be elected in a city in which African Americans constitute a minority of the population.

(A) When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968,

(B) He ran for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, and

(C) Running, in 1968, for mayor of Cleveland,

(D) When he ran for mayor of Cleveland in 1968,

(E) In 1968 he had run for mayor of Cleveland, and


I go with D.

'he' and 'Carl Stokes ' are refer to the same person. Therefore, we wouldn't say like B and E.

(C) 'Running for' is split, so strange.
(A) perfect tense means continue for a while, there is no need for past perfect tense.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 941
Location: Taiwan
Re: When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, Carl Stokes won the el  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2005, 21:10
Hi,

the PAST PERFECT TENSE indicates that an action was completed at some point in the past before something else happened.

In this question, 'run for' and 'won' two actions happend at the same time.

There is no reason to use the past perfect tense. Therefore, A and E are inappropriate.
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 3806
Location: Singapore
Re: When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, Carl Stokes won the el  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2005, 21:49
1
On the GMAT, you should only use the perfect tense (present/past) only when it's justified to do so (that is, you want to show 2 actions taking place at two distinct points on the time line).
Other than that, you should stick to basic tenses. (present,past,future)

Now look at the sentence again. Although its right to say he ran for mayorship, then won, thus proving that an African American candidate can win an election, it is not critical to seperate them here with the perfect tenses. In this sentence, all we want to do is say "Hey, here's an African American, he ran for an election and he won, so you can't say black americans can't win elections"
All these can be represented with the simple tense in (D).
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 3682
Re: When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, Carl Stokes won the el  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Apr 2005, 21:56
1
D should be right because past perfect tense is about an action that was accomplished and finished in the past.

Why would you not use past perfect here? Because the running is happening at the same time period as the winning; in 1968. I'll give you two examples:

eg I ran a lot in the summer of 1969 and I eventually won a marathon. --> This is two ind. clauses linked by conjunction "and" describing two things that both happened in 1969

eg I had run a lot until the summer of 1969, time at which I eventually broke my ankle. --> this demonstrate two sequences of event 1) X used to run a lot in the past UNTIL 2) he broke an ankle that year(but remember that he stopped running after then)

Getting back to the original question, we have NOT a sequence of events but rather, a description of two events that both happened in 1968 without any event preceding another one.
_________________
Best Regards,

Paul
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 991
Location: United States
Re: When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, Carl Stokes won the el  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Nov 2013, 22:02
1
Hi ashishdara

When he had run for mayor of cleveland in 1968, Carl stokes won the election,proving that an african american candidate can be elected in a city in which african american constitute a minority of population

1)When he had run for mayor of cleveland in 1968,
Wrong. Past perfect is wrong because it means Carl's running for mayor completed before Carl won the election. That does not make any sense. We just need a simple reporting sentence. --> simple past is better than past perfect.

2)He ran for the mayor of cleveland in 1968,and
Wrong. "and" is wrong. we do not need parallel structure here.

3)Running in 1968,for the mayor of cleveland,
Wrong. Modifier "running in 1968" means Carl won the election while he was running. Running what? Be aware of the comma after "1968".

4)When he ran for mayor of cleveland in 1968,
Correct.

5)In 1968 he had run for mayor of cleveland,and
Wrong. "and" is wrong, we do not need parallel structure here. In addition, past perfect is unnecessary.

Hope it helps.
_________________
Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 07 Jul 2012
Posts: 367
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
GPA: 3.5
Re: When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, Carl Stokes won the el  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Mar 2017, 07:31
1
When he had run for mayor of cleveland in 1968, Carl stokes won the election,proving that an african american candidate can be elected in a city in which african american constitute a minority of population
1)When he had run for mayor of cleveland in 1968, (Simple past tense is better when two events are happening at same time)
2)He ran for the mayor of cleveland in 1968,and (Pronoun should be used in second part of the sentence)
3)Running in 1968,for the mayor of cleveland, (While running in 1968 cleveland won the election totally changes the meaning)
4)When he ran for mayor of cleveland in 1968, (Correct)
5)In 1968 he had run for mayor of cleveland,and (Usage of past perfect is wrong)

Kudos please if you like my explanation!
_________________
Kindly hit kudos if my post helps!
Director
Director
User avatar
D
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 543
Location: France
Schools: INSEAD Jan '19
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 3.82
WE: Consulting (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, Carl Stokes won the el  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Nov 2018, 07:47
Step 1: Check out the verb tenses. Is "had run" correct? No; "ran" is more appropriate here. "Had run" suggests that the action occurred and ended before the time period mentioned. Eliminate (A).

Step 2: Eliminate (E).

Step 3: (B) does function as a modifier (as does (A)), but rather as a clause. In this role, the pronoun "he" is ambiguous. Does "he" stand for Carl Stokes? Probably, but the absence of a modifier creates a vague and awkward sentence. Eliminate. (C) does not use the preferred past tense and also intersperses "in 1968" between "running" and "for mayor". (D) seems to be OK. This is the correct choice.
_________________
Everything will fall into place…

There is perfect timing for
everything and everyone.
Never doubt, But Work on
improving yourself,
Keep the faith and
Stay ready. When it’s
finally your turn,
It will all make sense.
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58381
Re: When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, Carl Stokes won the el  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jan 2019, 11:56
pb_india wrote:
When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, Carl Stokes won the election, proving that an African American candidate can be elected in a city in which African Americans constitute a minority of the population.


(A) When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968,

(B) He ran for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, and

(C) Running, in 1968, for mayor of Cleveland,

(D) When he ran for mayor of Cleveland in 1968,

(E) In 1968 he had run for mayor of Cleveland, and


KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



D

(D) makes the sequence of events perfectly clear: Stokes ran for mayor at essentially the same time as he won the election. (A) and (E) use the past perfect had run, which makes it sound as if Stokes ran for mayor long before actually winning. (C)'s phrasing is awkward and its use of running tends to obscure the sense of the victor/ as the conclusion of the campaign. (B)'s phrasing is awkward and it's unclear who the antecedent of the pronoun he is.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, Carl Stokes won the el   [#permalink] 05 Jan 2019, 11:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

When he had run for mayor of Cleveland in 1968, Carl Stokes won the el

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne