| All Reviews > [Tests] e-GMAT Scholaranium Reviews |
Their personal question quality across both verbal and quant is not good at all, and they even tell you the questions are good enough and you won't have to use official material which is frankly absurd. Their course as well is not great as they focus highly on methods/concepts which is good but there is little to no focus on how to implement the methods in a short amount of time and you can waste hours trying to implement it but it won't work. All in all - their course has a lot of talk and limited depth at least for my personal learning style.
Joined: Mar 17, 2011
Posts: 32
Kudos: 16
Self-reported Score:
710 Q49 V38
740 Q50 V39
Even though the verbal scholaranium is at the top of the game, the same expectations from the quant left me disappointed. In the questions classified, even though the questions provided for easy and medium are fine, the hard questions provided are lengthy rather than logical. It is a great disappointment to solve those hard questions as the questions, instead of being logical end up being flooded with multiple data. I wonder if most of the questions are anywhere near to the GMAT quant questions. I felt extreme disappointment for the reason indicated above and expect the fine members at egmat to revise the scholaranium as this is way below the standards we expect of the course provider like egmat. Thank you for the opportunity to write a review.