|All Reviews > Talayva's Reviews|
Features of Scholoranium platform that are most helpful are section wise split of your strengths and weaknesses . In general the hard questions are a bit harder than the GMAT hard questions . In RC , performance is computed based on the subject of the passage. This helps in preparing more in a specific subject . Ability Quizzes are god in predicting your capability . However the questions which you do not attempt are also considered as incorrect and are added to dashboard incorrect questions . This is a wrong indication as this is a timing mistake and not that you are weak in an area
I was lacking in a suitable strategy . I was following raw methods . For sentence correction , I never understood the meaning of the sentence. With the 3 step strategy of egmat I could comfortably solve tough questions in decent time . How ever , there. was some problem with the videos and I had to oft en reload . Interactive questions helped to learn concepts effectively. Initially I took lot of time in learning the strategy . As I moved to the sectional tests , I started gaining momentum . Don’t concentrate on timing in the beginning . All concepts were not videos and few were in the form of articles
Starting with plus points . Quant is very good . User interface is pretty similar to actual user interface. Post test Analytics should have included something similar to manhattan Cats where you get to analyse your mistakes more clear. Errors topic wse should be more clearly be shown . verbal section scoring was a bit tough compared to actual Quant . I scored 38 on actuyal GMAT and 18 on Gmat club tests . Quant was pretty similar to actual Gmat , bit tougher . Manhattan Quant is even tougher Explanations for quant questions are mostly given by experts , but verbal section laks explanations for few. Overall with slight modifications it is a good resource , especially fpr quant .