So, I got this wrong

Tricky question that traps you if you aren't all that careful. Again, trying to explain it helped me realize I was wrong.
Sweetness is defined as the sugar content per unit of weight.
At a fruit stand, mangoes (M) are sweeter than apples (A), apples are sweeter than lemons (L).
So we have M > A > L.
We can also visualize what sweetness could imply by assuming - M is 8 grams of sugar per 50 grams; A is 5 grams of sugar / 50g; L is 1 gram / 50 g.
We also know that we can only really use combinations of two, and that equal weight will be used no matter what. Combinations could be:
M + A
M + L
L + A
Cool, with all this information, let's look at the statements.
Statement I: The fruit salad is less sweet than apples.Now, I can look at my assumed values again: Apple is 5 grams of sugar / 50 grams. Now, any mixture involving M and A, will obviously be sweeter than apple. For instance, 100 grams of M+A will have 8 + 5 = 13 grams of sugar / 100 grams, which in a relative ratio, is 6.5 grams / 50 grams.
However, what if the mixture involves M and L? M is 8 grams of sugar / 50 grams; L is 1 gram of sugar / 50 grams. That's 9 grams per 100 grams or 4.5 grams of sugar per 50 grams,
which is LESS than apple.Clearly, if you assume different values in different proportions this can go either way, but this kind of assumption is enough for you to know that
STATEMENT I alone is not sufficient.
Statement II: The fruit salad is sweeter than a fruit salad made using apples and lemons.This just says that the fruit salad in the stem is sweeter than an A + L fruit salad. There's a very simple way to figure this out: the other two possible combinations both contain mango, and any other combination will take, will thus, contain mango and be sweeter. There's no other way to look at this.
Statement II alone is sufficient - Answer is B.Bunuel