12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition - Day 6: Software Engineer

The argument states that the application's unique algorithm allows it to handle data packet loss more efficiently than standard methods, which is crucial for functioning under extreme conditions. Thus, we need to assess factors that could validate or challenge this claim.


(A) Whether the software application can also perform well in conditions with stable network connectivity.
This option is relevant but does not directly address the core claim about the algorithm's efficiency under extreme conditions.

(B) Whether other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm.
This could provide context about the uniqueness of the application but does not directly impact its performance under extreme conditions. Also, the argument states "A certain software application is one of a few", which means there could be other applications that already utilize a similar algorithm.

(C) Whether the software application's efficient handling of packet loss is associated with slower data transmission rates in normal conditions.
Normal conditions are irrelevant here.

(D) Whether using the software in extreme network conditions will, over time, improve the network’s stability.
This option does not directly relate to evaluating the performance of the application itself and its algorithm. Network's stability and how it gets affected is irrelevant here.

(E) Whether the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen.
This option is crucial because it directly addresses how the algorithm is under increasingly challenging conditions. If its efficiency declines significantly, it would undermine the claim that it operates effectively under extreme circumstances.

Thus, the best choice is (E).

Premises 1: A certain software application operates effectively under extreme network conditions
Premises 2: the application uses a unique algorithm that handles data packet loss more efficiently in simulations
Conclusion : The unique algorithm must be the key feature llowing effective operation in extreme conditions

Now lets evaluate each option

(A) This doesn't help evaluate the argument. The application's performance in stable conditions doesn't effect its performance in extreme conditions

(B) This is the most relevant option. If other application use a similar algorithm but don't perform as well in extreme conditions it would weaken the argument if they don't use a similar algorithm it would strengthen the argument

(C) this doesn't directly address the application's performance in extreme condition which is the focus of the argument

(D) This is about the effect of using the software on network stability, which is unrelated to the argument about why the software perform well

(E) while relevant, this doesn't directly address whether the algorithm is the key feature for performance in extreme condition

The correct answer is (B) Determining whether other applications use a similar algorithm would be most important in evaluating this argument. If they do, and don't perform as well it would suggest that the algorithm alone isn't the key feature . if they don't, it strengthen the argument that this unique algorithm is indeed the key to the application's performance

The answer is option E.
Given: The Software application works well under extreme network conditions and disrupts the other. And they point out that the unique algorithm could be the reason for its efficiency.

(A) Whether the software application can also perform well in conditions with stable network connectivity. --We already know they work well in extreme network conditions, so it should work under stable network

(B) Whether other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm. -- If yes - Doesn't strengthen the argument.
If no - Then it doesn't do anything to the argument.

(C) Whether the software application's efficient handling of packet loss is associated with slower data transmission rates in normal conditions. -- it does not directly address whether the algorithm is truly effective under extreme network conditions, where the application is claimed to excel.

(D) Whether using the software in extreme network conditions will, over time, improve the network’s stability. -- We are not concerned about improving the network stability

(E) Whether the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen. --if yes - if the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network gets poor, it weakens the argument

If no- it strengthens the argument

option E is correct answer

since all other options are not talking about algorithm's efficiency, they are ruled out

(A) "handles data packet loss more efficiently than standard methods", it implies than under any condition the unique algorithm is better than the standard algorithm under any circumstance.
(B) With this we can confirm its because of the unique algorithm.
(C) Out of scope, transmission speed is an independent factor too
(D) network's stability is independent of the software
(E) While it may be true, its expected outcome not something of primary importance.

Hence (B)

To answer the evaluate the arguments questions, we need to find an answer choice that provides two ways for the argument, yes and a no.

The main point of the argument is that the application's unique algorithm must be the key feature that allows it to operate effectively in these extreme conditions.


(A) Whether the software application can also perform well in conditions with stable network connectivity. - Talks about stable network connectivity which is irrelevant to the environment that software application functions.

(B) Whether other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm. -
Not irrelevant, what if they use the similar algorithm, how is to going affect the currrent applications effectiveness.

(C) Whether the software application's efficient handling of packet loss is associated with slower data transmission rates in normal conditions. - The argument mainly interested in the extreme conditions and this option talks about normal conditions. Not relevant

(D) Whether using the software in extreme network conditions will, over time, improve the network’s stability.
This option is talking about the application improving networks ability. The application operates in extreme conditions, the arguments doesn't talk about how the application affects the extreme conditions.

(E) Whether the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen. This option talks about how the performance of algorithm is going to be if the conditions further worsen. Which is relevant to understand the performance of algorithm in overall context. Correct.

Software Engineer: A certain software application is one of a few in a closely related category that operates effectively under extreme network conditions, which often disrupt other software applications.

Studies on the application's performance have revealed that it utilizes a unique algorithm that, in simulations, handles data packet loss more efficiently than standard methods.

Conclusion: Hence, the application's unique algorithm must be the key feature that allows it to operate effectively in these extreme conditions.

In evaluating the argument, it would be most important to determine which of the following?

(A) Whether the software application can also perform well in conditions with stable network connectivity.
The conclusion states that the application's unique algorithm is the key feature that allows it to operate effectively in the extreme conditions. Therefore, whether the software applications performs well in conditions with stable network connectivity or not does not impact the conclusion since it is about extreme network conditions.
Incorrect

(B) Whether other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm.
If yes, other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm and they don't perform as well in extreme network conditions then the application's unique algorithm IS NOT the key feature that allows it to operate effectively in these extreme conditions and the conclusion falls apart.
If no, other software applications in the closely related category don't utilize a similar algorithm, then the conclusion that the application's unique algorithm is the key feature that allows it to operate effectively in the extreme conditions holds true.
Correct

(C) Whether the software application's efficient handling of packet loss is associated with slower data transmission rates in normal conditions.
The conclusion states that the application's unique algorithm is the key feature that allows it to operate effectively in the extreme conditions. Therefore, whether the software application's efficient handling of packet loss is associated with slower data transmission rates in normal conditions or not does not impact the conclusion since the conclusion is not about slower data transmission rates.
Incorrect

(D) Whether using the software in extreme network conditions will, over time, improve the network’s stability.
The conclusion states that the application's unique algorithm is the key feature that allows it to operate effectively in the extreme conditions. Therefore, whether using the software in extreme network conditions will, over time, improve the network’s stability or not does not impact the conclusion since the conclusion is not about improving network stability over time.
Incorrect

(E) Whether the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen.
The conclusion states that the application's unique algorithm is the key feature that allows it to operate effectively in the extreme conditions. Therefore, whether the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen or not does not impact the conclusion. Even if the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen, it can still perform better than the applications which don't use the algorithm
Incorrect

IMO B

In Evaluate questions, Answering 'yes' should strengthen and 'no' should weaken. i.e BOTH the things should happen.

What is the Author assuming here? That handling data packet loss more efficiently is reason the applications are more efficient. And Hence the algorithm must be the key feature. But what is its just one of the reason and Not the 'key' reason
But what if other efficient softwares dont have similar algorithm and they optimise something else?

Option B is clearly correct

On analyzing the options from (A) to (E),

(A) Whether the software application can also perform well in conditions with stable network connectivity- Irrelevant to the argument as the argument focuses on performance under extreme network conditions, not under stable conditions. Eliminate
(B) Whether other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm- This is relevant to the argument as if the answer is a yes then that significantly weakens the case being made for the uniqueness of the algorithm being a contributing factor to efficiency as it won't be able to address the failure of the other software apps. In case it's a no it strengthens our case that the algorithm is a major contributing factor to the success of the main app in question. Keep this option
(C) Whether the software application's efficient handling of packet loss is associated with slower data transmission rates in normal conditions- While this might provide additional insight into the algorithm's trade-offs, it is not directly relevant to evaluating whether the algorithm is the key feature for handling extreme conditions. Eliminate
(D) Whether using the software in extreme network conditions will, over time, improve the network’s stability-This is irrelevant to the argument. The conclusion does not depend on whether the software improves network stability over time. Eliminate
(E) Whether the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen-Even though it may seem relevant, this option does not directly address whether the algorithm is the critical factor enabling effective performance under extreme conditions. Because even if performance deteriorates we don't know the level of deterioration. Eliminate

Hence the correct answer to this question is option (B)

Question type:

Evaluate Argument

Answer choice analysis:

A. Whether the software application can also perform well in conditions with stable network connectivity.

Incorrect, Irrelevant we are not concerned about what happens in conditions with stable network connectivity.

B. Whether other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm.

Incorrect, Irrelevant we are not concerned about other software applications

C. Whether the software application's efficient handling of packet loss is associated with slower data transmission rates in normal conditions.

Incorrect, Irrelevant we are not concerned about data transmission rates in normal conditions.


D. Whether using the software in extreme network conditions will, over time, improve the network’s stability.

Incorrect. Irrelevant we are not concerned about what will happen to the network’s stability.

E. Whether the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen.

Correct. If this is true, then it creates a doubt on the conclusion and if false it supports the conclusion.

E is the answer

(A): "Whether the software application can also perform well in conditions with stable network connectivity."
This is irrelevant to the argument, as the claim focuses on performance under extreme network conditions, not stable conditions. Incorrect.
(B): "Whether other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm.
"This is directly relevant. If other applications in the same category also use a similar algorithm but do not perform as effectively in extreme conditions, it would weaken the claim that the algorithm is the key feature. Conversely, if they do not use the algorithm and perform worse, it supports the claim. Correct.
(C): "Whether the software application's efficient handling of packet loss is associated with slower data transmission rates in normal conditions."While this could provide additional information about trade-offs in the algorithm, it is unrelated to the specific claim about extreme network conditions. Incorrect.
(D): "Whether using the software in extreme network conditions will, over time, improve the network’s stability."The argument is about how the software performs, not its long-term effects on the network. Incorrect.
(E): "Whether the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen."
While this might shed light on the algorithm’s limitations, it does not help evaluate whether the algorithm is the key feature that allows the software to outperform others in extreme conditions. Incorrect.

IMO B

[*](A) Irrelevant. The argument is about performance in extreme conditions, not stable conditions.
[*](B) Relevant. If other applications use similar algorithms, Then that could not be the cause of the effectiveness, If not then this could be the reason for it, directly impacting the argument.
[*](C) Irrelevant. The trade-offs in normal conditions do not address the performance under extreme conditions.
[*](D) Irrelevant. The effect on network stability over time is not tied to the application's performance in extreme conditions.
[*](E) Irrelevant. Declining efficiency as conditions worsen doesn’t assess whether the algorithm is the key distinguishing factor.

Hence IMO B

Software (In closely related category)----> Good in Bad Net

Software ---> Unique algorithm handles data loss better ----> Algorithm Key Feature

Narrowed answers down to B and D and went for B, as that would make the algorithm not a key feature.

(A) Whether the software application can also perform well in conditions with stable network connectivity.
(B) Whether other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm.
(C) Whether the software application's efficient handling of packet loss is associated with slower data transmission rates in normal conditions.

• This is not directly relevant to the argument about the software’s performance under extreme conditions. The key concern is the application’s behavior under extreme network conditions, not its performance under normal conditions.

(D) Whether using the software in extreme network conditions will, over time, improve the network’s stability.

• This option is irrelevant because it discusses the impact of using the software on the network's stability, which is outside the scope of the argument. The argument is about how the software itself handles extreme network conditions, not its effect on the network.

(E) Whether the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen.

Option E asks the most crucial question.

E is the most crucial.

In evaluating the argument, it would be most important to determine which of the following? Option choice which strengthens or weakens the argument on Yes/No would be the ideal candidate to evaluate the given argument

(A) Whether the software application can also perform well in conditions with stable network connectivity. This is good to know but irrelevant in the context of evaluation
(B) Whether other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm. We are already told that certain software application is one of a few so we are not trying to justify similar applications here
(C) Whether the software application's efficient handling of packet loss is associated with slower data transmission rates in normal conditions. Reasons on the efficiency of the application would be mostly irrelevant in the evaluation
(D) Whether using the software in extreme network conditions will, over time, improve the network’s stability. If this happens then it's good but irrelevant to evaluate our current argument
(E) Whether the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen. This seems interesting. If the efficiency of the algorithm doesn't decline as the network condition worsen then it strengthens the argument by giving one more premise for our conclusion. But if does decline then it weakens our argument because algorithm then won't be the key feature to improve the operational efficiency.

Answer: E

A. This is irrelevant because argument specifically focuses on performance under extreme conditions. INCORRECT

B. Argument already states that the algorithm is "unique". Unnecessary to evaluate. INCORRECT

C. The trade-off between handling packet loss and data transmission rates under normal conditions does not challenge or support the claim about performance in extreme conditions. INCORRECT

D. We are not concerned with long term effects. INCORRECT

E. If the algorithm becomes inefficient under worsening conditions, it would challenge the claim that algorithm is key factor. Conversely, if algo maintains the efficiency, it would support the argument. CORRECT

Answer E.