12 Days of Christmas GMAT Competition - Day 6: Software Engineer

P1: A certain software application is one of a few in a closely related category that operates effectively under extreme network conditions
P2: Studies revealed that it utilizes a unique algorithm that handles data packet loss more efficiently than standard methods.
P3: unique algorithm is reason allows it to operate effectively in these extreme conditions.

In evaluating the argument, it would be most important to determine which of the following?

(A) Whether the software application can also perform well in conditions with stable network connectivity.
yes, No effect on the cause-and-effect thing
No, No effect in the cause and effect.

(B) Whether other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm.
yes, then they should also work in the worse Weather (weakening)
No, then it is the only reason that is making the application work in the worse weather. (Strengthens)

Yes, then it is the answer


(C) Whether the software application's efficient handling of packet loss is associated with slower data transmission rates in normal conditions.
even if it is, no effect on conclusion
and Even if it is not, no effect on conclusion
Very irreverent


(D) Whether using the software in extreme network conditions will, over time, improve the network’s stability.
if it improves the stability, no effect(irreverent)
If it doesn't improve the stability, no effect(irreverent)

(E) Whether the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen.
(we are not concern about the efficiency and network condition) - Not helps in evaluating

Argument:

• Claim: Using a unique algorithm, a software app works well in bad network conditions.
• Support: This algorithm handles lost data better than standard methods.

What to Check:
To see if the claim is strong, we need to confirm that the unique algorithm is why the app performs better.
Why Option B is Key:

• Option B: Whether other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm.
• Why It Matters:
  
  • If other apps use similar algorithms but don’t perform as well: It shows the unique algorithm is special and really the reason for better performance.
  • If other apps have the same algorithm and also perform well: It might mean the algorithm alone isn’t the only reason for success.

Answer:
B. Whether other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm.

To evaluate the argument, we need to test if the claim, the unique algorithm is the main reason the application works better under extreme network conditions, makes sense or not.

IMO the correct answer is B.

The argument says the unique algorithm is what makes the application stand out. To check if that’s true, we need to see if other apps in the same category use similar algorithms. If they do and still don’t perform well, then the algorithm might not be the reason for the application’s success. But if no other apps use the same algorithm, it supports the idea that the algorithm is important.

Here's how I eliminated other options :

A: The argument is about extreme network conditions, not stable ones. Knowing how the app works under normal conditions doesn’t really help here.
C: This talks about performance trade-offs in normal conditions, but it doesn’t address the central claim about the algorithm's role in handling extreme conditions.
D: The argument is about how well the app performs, not about whether it can improve the network itself.
E: This goes beyond the premise that the application operates effectively under extreme network conditions.

So, B is the best option because it directly tests the claim about the algorithm being the key factor.

Conclusion: the application's unique algorithm must be the key feature that allows it to operate effectively in these extreme conditions

(A) Whether the software application can also perform well in conditions with stable network connectivity.
We are discussing extreme network conditions. So a test in the stable condition may not be relevant

(B) Whether other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm.
If other applications doesn't use the algorithm and perform well or NOT well, we can't conclude anything about this unique algorithm.

(C) Whether the software application's efficient handling of packet loss is associated with slower data transmission rates in normal conditions.
Irrelevant

(D) Whether using the software in extreme network conditions will, over time, improve the network’s stability.
irrelevant

(E) Whether the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen.
If the algorithm efficiency doesn't decline as the network conditions worsen, we can conclude that it is the key feature. If the efficiency declines, it may not be the key feature

Conclusion: The application's unique algorithm must be the key feature that allows it to operate effectively in these extreme conditions

Evaluating the options:
(A) Whether the software application can also perform well in conditions with stable network connectivity.
Out of scope as stable network connectivity is not in question here.Eliminate

(B) Whether other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm.
It has been mentioned that "which often disrupt other software applications", now if the other software applications also use a similar algorithm then maybe it will not be the reason that allows it to operate effectively in these extreme conditions. Keep

(C) Whether the software application's efficient handling of packet loss is associated with slower data transmission rates in normal conditions.
Out of scope as performance in normal conditions is not in question here.Eliminate

(D) Whether using the software in extreme network conditions will, over time, improve the network’s stability.
Out of scope as improving network stability is not the goal here.Eliminate

(E) Whether the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen.
Even if this is true, it does not affect the argument in any way.Eliminate

B is the correct answer

In order to evaluate the argument, we need to either confirm that the conclusion (the application's unique algorithm must be the key feature that allows it to operate effectively in these extreme conditions) is true, or negate it.

A - even if it works well in stable conditions, this does not tell us anything about extreme conditions which are our point of discussion. ELIMINATE

B - if other companies also use it, and still they don’t perform well, then it must be something else that’s the major reason for it’s effectiveness.
If other companies do not use it, then this may be the reason for it’s efficacy. KEEP

C - even if it is associated with faster functioning in normal conditions, it does not affect our argument because we’re focusing on extreme conditions. ELIMINATE

D - even if it improves the speed, it does not mean that this is the main reason behind its efficiency in extreme conditions. ELIMINATE

E - even if it worsens, it’s still better than most. And maybe it’s “worse” is still better than most. ELIMINATE

IMO E

(E) Whether the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen.

This option is most critical in evaluating the argument because it directly addresses the core claim that the unique algorithm is the key feature enabling the software application to operate effectively under extreme network conditions. If the efficiency of the algorithm declines as network conditions worsen, it would challenge the argument's validity.

For evaluate, we take arguments to the extreme and one side should weaken & another should strengthen the conclusion -

(A) Whether the software application can also perform well in conditions with stable network connectivity. - Taking this to extremes doesn't help us with the conclusion weakening or strengthening as its not related to the algorithm at all - Eliminate

(B) Whether other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm - CORRECT
If yes, then its not the unique algorithm which is helping with the efficiency
If no, then this provides a strengther for the unique algorithm being the reason for efficiency

(C) Whether the software application's efficient handling of packet loss is associated with slower data transmission rates in normal conditions. - Same as A, taking to extreme suggests nothing about the algorithm - Eliminate

(D) Whether using the software in extreme network conditions will, over time, improve the network’s stability - Same as A & C - Eliminate

(E) Whether the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen -
if yes, the efficiency of the algorithm declines in worse conditions (worse doesn't imply extreme) - so its not in sync with the conclusion - ELIMINATE

The most important factor in evaluating this argument is whether the unique algorithm is indeed the reason the software performs well in extreme conditions. The argument is based on the assumption that the algorithm is the primary cause of its good performance under those conditions.

(A) Whether the software application can also perform well in conditions with stable network connectivity.
This choice is not directly relevant to the argument, which focuses on the software's performance under extreme conditions (where network disruptions occur). The performance under stable conditions does not necessarily tell us anything about the key factor for its performance under extreme conditions. INCORRECT

(B) Whether other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm.
While this is an interesting point, it doesn't directly address whether the unique algorithm is the key feature responsible for the application's performance under extreme conditions. The fact that other applications might use a similar algorithm doesn't directly challenge or confirm the argument. INCORRECT

(C) Whether the software application's efficient handling of packet loss is associated with slower data transmission rates in normal conditions.
This choice introduces a potential trade-off between handling packet loss and overall transmission speed in normal conditions. However, the argument is concerned with the software's performance under extreme conditions, not normal ones. This doesn't directly help assess the claim that the algorithm is key to performance in extreme conditions. INCORRECT

(D) Whether using the software in extreme network conditions will, over time, improve the network’s stability.
This is not relevant to the argument. The argument focuses on the software’s performance under extreme conditions, not on whether it can improve network conditions themselves. INCORRECT

(E) Whether the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen.
This choice directly addresses the core of the argument. If the efficiency of the algorithm declines as network conditions worsen, it would undermine the claim that the algorithm is the key factor in the application's performance under extreme conditions. The argument assumes that the algorithm enables effective performance even under extreme conditions, so determining whether the algorithm continues to function effectively as conditions worsen is critical. CORRECT

IMO E

Unique algorithm can handling data packet loss better more efficiently than standard method => key features

(A) Stable network connectivity just illustrate normal situation, not extreme situation (x)
(B) Similar algorithm in other software shows that this algorithm is not unique => not key feature (weaken) (x)
(C) It concern normal conditions, but not extreme situation (x)
(D) It focus wrongly on network's stability (x)
(E) The efficiency of algorithm in solving extreme conditions (network condition worsen) is discussed (v)

Therefore E is the answer

Argument : Evaluate that the algorithm is the key feature that allows for effective operations in extreme conditions

Options :
A - Irrelevant as this does not help evaluate the argument
B - To check if other software also possess the argument - which will help identify if algorithm is the reason for effectiveness
C - Irrelevant
D - Irrelevant mention of stability
E - This is a further checking for the algorithm

The application's unique algorithm must be the key feature that allows it to operate effectively in these extreme conditions.

(A) Whether the software application can also perform well in conditions with stable network connectivity.
(B) Whether other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm.

• This is also irrelevant as its describing about other applications
  

(C) Whether the software application's efficient handling of packet loss is associated with slower data transmission rates in normal conditions.

• Not relevant, as author's focus is on performance under extreme network conditions, not normal ones.
  

(D) Whether using the software in extreme network conditions will, over time, improve the network’s stability.

• Irrelevant, as author's focus is on performance under extreme network conditions, not the network's stability improvement.
  

(E) Whether the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen.

• Very relevant, as it directly analyses/questions the performance under worsening/ extreme network conditions.

Answer is E

(A) The argument is about performance under extreme network conditions, not stable ones

(B) If other software with similar algorithms does not perform effectively in extreme conditions, it would cast doubt on whether the algorithm is the key factor. Conversely, if no other applications use the same algorithm, the argument's claim would be strengthened - Correct

(C) The argument is not about trade-offs in normal conditions but about effectiveness in extreme conditions

(D) The argument concerns the application's performance, not its long-term effects on the network

(E) It is already given that the software performs well under extreme conditions

To evaluate the argument, we need to determine if the algorithm is indeed the key factor that allows the software to perform well under these extreme conditions.

(A) Whether the software application can also perform well in conditions with stable network connectivity.
This doesn't address the core of the argument, which is about performance under extreme network conditions. If the software performs well under stable conditions, it doesn't necessarily inform us about the key role of the algorithm in extreme conditions, which is the focus of the argument.

(B) Whether other software applications in the closely related category also utilize a similar algorithm.
This is relevant because if other software applications in the same category also use a similar algorithm, it could suggest that the algorithm is a typical solution for handling packet loss. This might weaken the argument by showing that the software’s success isn’t necessarily due to its unique algorithm, but rather because such algorithms are commonly effective in these conditions.

(C) Whether the software application's efficient handling of packet loss is associated with slower data transmission rates in normal conditions.
This option raises an interesting point, but it focuses on a potential trade-off between handling packet loss and transmission rates under normal conditions. The argument is focused on extreme network conditions, and this question doesn't directly address whether the unique algorithm is responsible for the software's effectiveness in such conditions.

(D) Whether using the software in extreme network conditions will, over time, improve the network’s stability. CORRECT
This is the key. The argument focuses on the software’s performance in extreme conditions, and improving network stability is essential.

(E) Whether the efficiency of the algorithm declines as the network conditions worsen.
It is not necessay to evaluate the algorithm beyond extreme conditions.

Answer D

In this argument, the focal point is that the unique algorithm against data loss is the main reason for app's efficiency in extreme network conditions. Let's be attentive here: it doesn't really cover the long-term result of this efficiency, its performance on the market, etc. - it only says that this algorithm is exactly why in extreme conditions it's efficient.

(A) This is out of scope. Eliminate.
(B) This is not exactly helpful, as we know the algorithm is unique and we wouldn't know whether similar algorithm-users perform quite as well in these conditions. Eliminate.
(C) If the efficiency is coming from another source than the algorithm, it breaks the argument. Seems right.
(D) Irrelevant as speaks about future. Eliminate.
(E) Exact timeline of how the algorithm performs is not relevant. Eliminate.

Therefore, the answer is C.

Premise: A certain software application is one of a few similar applications that operates effectively under extreme network conditions, which often disrupt other applications.
Premise: Studies on this certain application’s performance revealed that it utilizes a unique algorithm that, in simulations, handles data packet loss more efficiently than standard methods.
Conclusion: The application’s unique algorithm must be the key feature that allows it to operate effectively in extreme conditions.

We’re looking for which additional info would help us best evaluate the argument.

A. This would not be helpful. The conclusion isn’t about stable connectivity situations.
B. This would be helpful to determine. If other applications use a similar algorithm, but they’re less effective in extreme conditions, then this app’s unique algorithm would seem to be the differentiating factor.
C. This isn’t helpful. We’re talking about extreme conditions, not normal conditions.
D. This isn't helpful. We’re not concerned with future potentialities.
E. Tempting, but ultimately not helpful. Even if the efficiency does decline as the network condition worsens, it could still be the case that the unique algorithm is the key feature that allows the application to operate in extreme conditions.

Best answer is B.