The question doesn't make sense. As I'd interpret it, the third fruit is just as likely to be an apple as the first fruit, if you have no information about the first two selections. So P(A) = P(B) = 4/7. It's just like picking the first card and the third card from a deck of cards. They each have a 1/4 probability of being a diamond.
Since the OA here is E, what the question presumably means to ask is:
if P(A) is the probability the first selection is an apple, and P(B) is the probability, after the first two selections have been made, that the third selection is an apple, what could be true? Then P(A) is 4/7, and P(B) is something out of 5, so P(A) cannot be equal to P(B). P(B) can be greater than P(A) if we remove oranges with the first two picks, and otherwise will be less than P(A). But if that's what the question means, it needs to say that -- no mathematician in the universe would interpret this question, as written, in this way.