Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
04 Dec 2016, 07:10
Kudos
Bookmarks
I think it will be value added to log the GMAT study process.
Dec 4 2016
1hr 29 min done in the AM.
MGMAT book 1.
The first two chapters and the DS appendix.
Let the games begin.
Target test date: when a practice test indicates a high score.
Materials:
MGMAT
GMAC
OG
Bunuels compilation
GMAT club quant book
And as many practice tests as I can get my hands on
Background:
Sat for the GRE with no prep several years ago and hit 96% on verbal.
Quant will be the uphill climb.
See you tomorrow
Dec 4 2016
1hr 29 min done in the AM.
MGMAT book 1.
The first two chapters and the DS appendix.
Let the games begin.
Target test date: when a practice test indicates a high score.
Materials:
MGMAT
GMAC
OG
Bunuels compilation
GMAT club quant book
And as many practice tests as I can get my hands on
Background:
Sat for the GRE with no prep several years ago and hit 96% on verbal.
Quant will be the uphill climb.
See you tomorrow
05 Dec 2016, 14:46
Kudos
Bookmarks
Only a measly 13 min on DS today.
Scheduled a couple hours tomorrow.
740+ one way or the other.
Ain't no way to make it happen than to make it happen.
Posted from my mobile device
Scheduled a couple hours tomorrow.
740+ one way or the other.
Ain't no way to make it happen than to make it happen.
Posted from my mobile device
05 Dec 2016, 22:36
Kudos
Bookmarks
The DS problem sets are interesting and it is obvious I need to change my mindset in order to solve them consistently.
Here is an example from the MGMAT DS appendix:
If xyz ?= 0, is 3x/2 + y + 2z = 7x/2 + y?
(1) y=3 and x= 2
(2) z=-x
Without rewriting the question with like variables, you can use the info in statement 1 and find z=-2 pretty quickly BUT in the context of the question, that is still not sufficient.
That is going to take some undoing of old thought processes.
Immediately I jumped to the thought that "I now know z off of statement 1 alone and can solve" But in the context of the question statement 1 may give you z, which only then allows you to arrive at a "sufficient", but in itself finding z is not the same as making statement 1 sufficient on its own.
That's a convoluted way to tap that out on my phone, but hopefully that makes sense to my two readers and me when I look at this later.
Here is an example from the MGMAT DS appendix:
If xyz ?= 0, is 3x/2 + y + 2z = 7x/2 + y?
(1) y=3 and x= 2
(2) z=-x
Without rewriting the question with like variables, you can use the info in statement 1 and find z=-2 pretty quickly BUT in the context of the question, that is still not sufficient.
That is going to take some undoing of old thought processes.
Immediately I jumped to the thought that "I now know z off of statement 1 alone and can solve" But in the context of the question statement 1 may give you z, which only then allows you to arrive at a "sufficient", but in itself finding z is not the same as making statement 1 sufficient on its own.
That's a convoluted way to tap that out on my phone, but hopefully that makes sense to my two readers and me when I look at this later.
