Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 02:46 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 02:46
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
User avatar
warriorguy
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Last visit: 08 Feb 2023
Posts: 377
Own Kudos:
364
Given Kudos: 144
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Telecommunications)
Posts: 377
Kudos: 364
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood 18 May 2017, 20:48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
You know that I hate idioms, warriorguy! :lol:

I'm half-kidding. The lazy answer would be that "helpful to" is the incorrect idiom in this case, but that's not a very useful thing for me to say -- especially since "helped to" can be OK under different circumstances. To be honest, I'm struggling to find a way to explain the difference coherently, but I'll do my best.

Warning: the next two paragraphs really might not be useful at all -- and they definitely aren't important! :)

    "Helpful in" would be used to indicate purpose. The basic structure of the idiom is "X is helpful in verb-ing Y." Example: "A well-designed plan is helpful in achieving any goal". ("Helpful for" would be fine here, too.)

    But I think we only use "helpful to" in a funny passive structure like this one: "It is helpful to study with fellow GMAT Club members before taking the exam." Maybe somebody can correct me on this, but I think "helpful to" requires an "it is" type of construction. I don't think it makes sense to say "X is helpful to Y" or "X is helpful to accomplish Y" -- so the idiom in (D) and (E) are wrong.

(If those last two paragraphs didn't help, no problem. I wouldn't worry about those specific idioms. But this next part is a little bit more important...)

But here's the thing: whenever I'm unsure about an idiom, I try to avoid it entirely. Idioms are, by definition, arbitrary phrases that aren't based on generalizable rules -- and there are something like 40,000 idioms in the English language, depending on whom you ask. Sometimes, you'll know exactly which idioms are right and wrong, and that's great. But if you're not 100% sure, just see if you can find other definite, rule-based errors (as I did in my idiom-avoiding explanation above). A huge percentage of the time, you'll be able to completely dodge the idiom.

There's a little bit more on the topic of idioms in last Wednesday's verbal chat transcript: https://gmatclub.com/forum/verbal-chat- ... l#p1853539. If you find it useful, give Vyshak some kudos -- I'm impressed that he managed to compile the transcript while participating actively in the conversation!
Show more

Thanks GMATNinja.

Just to confirm that I understood correctly, 'helpful to' is not used to indicate purpose? Because I think I read somewhere that to-infinitive is used to indicate purpose.

Also, regarding the second paragraph, if we are to avoid idioms in a sentence, can we assume that idioms won't be the only factor tested in any GMAT question? :oops: :oops:
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,784
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,126
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,784
 [2]
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood 19 May 2017, 15:26
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Just to confirm that I understood correctly, 'helpful to' is not used to indicate purpose? Because I think I read somewhere that to-infinitive is used to indicate purpose.
Show more

"To" is used in hundreds of idioms, and it's also part of the infinitive form of all verbs ("to eat", "to be", etc.). So you definitely wouldn't want to overgeneralize and say that "to" always indicates purpose. And don't overthink "helpful to" -- it's very unlikely that you'll have to analyze that particular idiom on your exam. Just be aware that it seems to be correct only in the phrase "it is helpful to (verb)..."

Quote:
Also, regarding the second paragraph, if we are to avoid idioms in a sentence, can we assume that idioms won't be the only factor tested in any GMAT question?
Show more
I wouldn't go that far! Sure, plenty of GMAT SC answer choices contain multiple errors, and you can often avoid worrying about the idiom entirely. But that doesn't mean that you can ALWAYS avoid the idiom. Sometimes, the idiom really is a deciding factor. My point is that if you're not clear about the idiom, the best policy is to look hard for other errors -- and TRY to dodge the idiom if you can. It will work a lot of the time, including in this example. But it's not going to work all of the time -- just most of the time.
User avatar
Lucy Phuong
User avatar
Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Last visit: 12 Aug 2021
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
351
Given Kudos: 106
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V25
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.48
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 111
Kudos: 351
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood 20 May 2017, 03:25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
You know that I hate idioms, warriorguy! :lol:

I'm half-kidding. The lazy answer would be that "helpful to" is the incorrect idiom in this case, but that's not a very useful thing for me to say -- especially since "helped to" can be OK under different circumstances. To be honest, I'm struggling to find a way to explain the difference coherently, but I'll do my best.

Warning: the next two paragraphs really might not be useful at all -- and they definitely aren't important! :)

    "Helpful in" would be used to indicate purpose. The basic structure of the idiom is "X is helpful in verb-ing Y." Example: "A well-designed plan is helpful in achieving any goal". ("Helpful for" would be fine here, too.)

    But I think we only use "helpful to" in a funny passive structure like this one: "It is helpful to study with fellow GMAT Club members before taking the exam." Maybe somebody can correct me on this, but I think "helpful to" requires an "it is" type of construction. I don't think it makes sense to say "X is helpful to Y" or "X is helpful to accomplish Y" -- so the idiom in (D) and (E) are wrong.

(If those last two paragraphs didn't help, no problem. I wouldn't worry about those specific idioms. But this next part is a little bit more important...)

But here's the thing: whenever I'm unsure about an idiom, I try to avoid it entirely. Idioms are, by definition, arbitrary phrases that aren't based on generalizable rules -- and there are something like 40,000 idioms in the English language, depending on whom you ask. Sometimes, you'll know exactly which idioms are right and wrong, and that's great. But if you're not 100% sure, just see if you can find other definite, rule-based errors (as I did in my idiom-avoiding explanation above). A huge percentage of the time, you'll be able to completely dodge the idiom.

There's a little bit more on the topic of idioms in last Wednesday's verbal chat transcript: https://gmatclub.com/forum/verbal-chat- ... l#p1853539. If you find it useful, give Vyshak some kudos -- I'm impressed that he managed to compile the transcript while participating actively in the conversation!
Show more

Thanks a lot, GMATNinja. That's exactly what I concern in this question. Actually, I did eliminate wrong choices without considering "helpful + in/to...". But of course, I find it useful to read your post regarding this issue.

Btw, with your experience, have you ever faced with a question that requires this "helpful..." consideration to solve? (I mean, a question that cannot be answered without considering this issue). If yes, then I am glad that you could point it out. This will help a lot. Thanks.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,784
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,126
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,784
 [1]
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood 23 May 2017, 11:15
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Btw, with your experience, have you ever faced with a question that requires this "helpful..." consideration to solve? (I mean, a question that cannot be answered without considering this issue). If yes, then I am glad that you could point it out. This will help a lot. Thanks.
Show more

Nope, I've never seen a case where you absolutely have to figure out which of these "helpful..." idioms is correct. I suppose that there's no reason why they couldn't test it explicitly, but they have thousands of idioms to choose from, and I have no real reason to think that this exact issue will make or break your GMAT score. So you can eliminate this from your list of worries! :)
avatar
sriamlan
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2016
Last visit: 17 Jun 2017
Posts: 49
Own Kudos:
68
Given Kudos: 29
Location: India
Schools: ISB '18 Insead Sept '17 Kellogg '20 LBS '19 Oxford"19 IE Sept18 Intake
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V36
GPA: 3.01
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: ISB '18 Insead Sept '17 Kellogg '20 LBS '19 Oxford"19 IE Sept18 Intake
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V36
Posts: 49
Kudos: 68
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood 24 May 2017, 10:47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think for OA C to be correct there must be a "," between blood supply and blood. It should look as mentioned below

in eliminating from the nation's blood supply, blood that is contaminated with the virus
User avatar
Lucy Phuong
User avatar
Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Last visit: 12 Aug 2021
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
351
 [1]
Given Kudos: 106
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V25
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.48
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 111
Kudos: 351
 [1]
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood 24 May 2017, 19:55
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sriamlan
I think for OA C to be correct there must be a "," between blood supply and blood. It should look as mentioned below

in eliminating from the nation's blood supply, blood that is contaminated with the virus
Show more

Hi, IMHO I think if a comma is inserted the way you mention, then the meaning will be changed.

A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating from the nation's blood supply, blood that is contaminated with the virus.

Separated by a comma, the word "blood" seems to modify "nation's blood supply"; it means the WHOLE nation's blood supply is contaminated with the virus. This is not intended meaning of the sentence.

Option (C): ....eliminate from B A (it could be rewritten as eliminate A from B)
A: blood that is contaminated with the virus
B: the nation's blood supply
When you put a comma in the sentence: .... eliminate from B, A....
Then it looks like A is no longer what is eliminated, but B (A=B).
Also, we will have to put a big question mark before the comma - eliminate what?

Sir GMATNinja please guide us on this concern and correct me if I'm wrong. Thank you.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,784
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,126
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,784
 [1]
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood 16 Jun 2017, 19:42
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Lucy Phuong
sriamlan
I think for OA C to be correct there must be a "," between blood supply and blood. It should look as mentioned below

in eliminating from the nation's blood supply, blood that is contaminated with the virus

Hi, IMHO I think if a comma is inserted the way you mention, then the meaning will be changed.

A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating from the nation's blood supply, blood that is contaminated with the virus.

Separated by a comma, the word "blood" seems to modify "nation's blood supply"; it means the WHOLE nation's blood supply is contaminated with the virus. This is not intended meaning of the sentence.

Option (C): ....eliminate from B A (it could be rewritten as eliminate A from B)
A: blood that is contaminated with the virus
B: the nation's blood supply
When you put a comma in the sentence: .... eliminate from B, A....
Then it looks like A is no longer what is eliminated, but B (A=B).
Also, we will have to put a big question mark before the comma - eliminate what?

Sir GMATNinja please guide us on this concern and correct me if I'm wrong. Thank you.
Show more

Sorry, Lucy -- I could have sworn that I responded to this, but I think I just gave you kudos and then forgot to hit the "submit" button on my response. Bad Ninja!

I think you're spot-on here. It's really subtle, but it sounds like that extra comma would make it sounds like the whole supply is contaminated. Tricky stuff!
avatar
anuj11
avatar
Joined: 19 Jan 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2018
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
3
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 28
Kudos: 3
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood 20 Jul 2017, 02:36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja

Could please help me with D ?? The THAT after blood refers to blood right ? So where did the virus come from ??
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,784
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,126
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,784
 [1]
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood 28 Jul 2017, 14:11
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
anuj11
GMATNinja

Could please help me with D ?? The THAT after blood refers to blood right ? So where did the virus come from ??
Show more

It might help to compare (C) and (D) right next to each other:

    (C) in eliminating from the nation's blood supply blood that is contaminated with the virus
    (D) to eliminate blood that is contaminated with the virus from the nation's blood supply

In (C), it's 100% clear that the blood is contaminated with the virus -- and that we're eliminating that contaminated blood from the nation's blood supply. That's the entire point of the sentence: the blood that's contaminated with the virus must be eliminated from the nation's blood supply.

In (D), the sentence is flipped around in ways that don't quite make sense, and aren't as clear. First, it's literally saying that the virus is from the nation's blood supply, and that's really not the point -- presumably, the virus itself came from somewhere else before it landed in the blood supply. Second, (D) literally says that we're eliminating contaminated blood in general -- not necessarily contaminated blood that is in the nation's blood supply.

It's a subtle distinction, but enough to make (C) a better answer than (D).

I hope this helps!
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,262
Own Kudos:
42,463
 [2]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,262
Kudos: 42,463
 [2]
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood 16 Oct 2018, 05:15
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Helpful to or helpful in? To use such an eternal dilemma in a GMAT question is a trap by GMAT to lure some gullible test-takers who indiscriminately choose to approve the infinitive over the prepositional phrase. So be wary; forget the dilemma and look for more concrete deal closers.

A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood, contaminated with the virus, from the nation's blood supply.

(A) in eliminating blood, contaminated with the virus, from the nation's blood supply -- this choice weirdly suggests that the test helps in eliminating blood, from the nation's blood supply

(B) in eliminating blood from the nation's blood supply that is contaminated with the virus - -- This implies that the all of nation's blood supply is contaminated.

(C) in eliminating from the nation's blood supply blood that is contaminated with the virus---The modification is amply clear. Now the test helps to eliminate only the blood that is contaminated but not all. The correct choice by intended meaning.

D) to eliminate blood that is contaminated with the virus from the nation's blood supply -- This means that the virus comes from the nation's blood supply.

(E) to eliminate blood from the nation's blood supply that is contaminated with the virus --- Seems to say that the nation's blood supply is contaminated with the virus.

Nice practice question. Kudos to GMATPREP
User avatar
dcummins
User avatar
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Last visit: 16 Mar 2026
Posts: 1,021
Own Kudos:
2,377
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: INSEAD Sept'21 Intake (WA$$$) Melbourne (A$$$$) AGSM (A$$$$) Kellogg '23 (WL) Said '22 (A$$$$) CBS '23 (D) Booth '23 (WA) Anderson '23 (WA) Cambridge '22 (WL) LBS '23 (D) Stern '24 (WA)
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: INSEAD Sept'21 Intake (WA$$$) Melbourne (A$$$$) AGSM (A$$$$) Kellogg '23 (WL) Said '22 (A$$$$) CBS '23 (D) Booth '23 (WA) Anderson '23 (WA) Cambridge '22 (WL) LBS '23 (D) Stern '24 (WA)
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
Posts: 1,021
Kudos: 2,377
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood 08 Aug 2019, 17:43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can the relative pronoun that modify from a distance at all? I thought there were exceptions to the touch rule for some relative pronouns when say prepositions are used. If we look at B - i stupidly chose this over C because of how awkward C appeared but also I thought we needed to separate "blood" in the "blood supply blood" string in C
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,784
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,126
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,784
 [1]
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood 10 Aug 2019, 08:57
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dcummins
Can the relative pronoun that modify from a distance at all? I thought there were exceptions to the touch rule for some relative pronouns when say prepositions are used. If we look at B - i stupidly chose this over C because of how awkward C appeared but also I thought we needed to separate "blood" in the "blood supply blood" string in C
Show more
Yup, there are definitely exceptions to the "touch rule" for relative pronouns (i.e., modifiers beginning with "which", "that", "where", etc.) Check out this article, particularly "usage #4: "that" as a modifier (the “touch rule" and its exceptions)".

But as with many things on the GMAT, the question isn't "can this particular grammatical structure be correct?" There are painfully few absolute rules that ALWAYS apply on GMAT SC -- other than subject-verb agreement, it's hard to think of many. The more important question: "is the structure in this particular answer choice the best and clearest way to express a reasonable meaning for the sentence?"

Quote:
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood, contaminated with the virus, from the nation's blood supply.

(B) in eliminating blood from the nation's blood supply that is contaminated with the virus
(C) in eliminating from the nation's blood supply blood that is contaminated with the virus
Show more
In (B), could "that is contaminated with the virus" modify "blood from the nation's blood supply"? Sure, it COULD. But it's confusing at best: since "that is contaminated with the virus" is right next to "the nation's blood supply", my first instinct is that it's saying that the whole blood supply is contaminated. That's confusing. Is the sentence definitely WRONG? Maybe not, but it's not awesome.

(C)'s only crime is that it sounds funny, and that's never a good reason to eliminate an answer choice. The meaning is much clearer than in (B): it's immediately clear that the test eliminates "blood that is contaminated with the virus."

So no, the "touch rule" isn't really an absolute rule. But there's a reason it exists (as a guideline, or whatever you want to call it): noun modifiers are usually clearer if they're as close as possible to the noun they're modifying.

I hope this helps!
avatar
psls
avatar
Joined: 27 Jan 2021
Last visit: 12 Dec 2023
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
10
 [1]
Given Kudos: 131
Posts: 29
Kudos: 10
 [1]
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood 17 Apr 2021, 10:24
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Moderators,

GMATNinja generis BillyZ

I have question about choice(A).

If I change choice(A) by removing the last comma out to:
Quote:
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood, contaminated with the virus from the nation's blood supply.
Show more

COMMA + contaminated will modify preceding action clause "A new test AIDS has proved" instead of preceding noun "blood," right? That still doesn't make sense for meaning.

Thank you.
-tor
User avatar
bidskamikaze
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2018
Last visit: 29 Oct 2022
Posts: 251
Own Kudos:
307
Given Kudos: 160
Location: India
Schools: ESMT NUS '22 IIMA PGPX'23 NTU
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Schools: ESMT NUS '22 IIMA PGPX'23 NTU
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 251
Kudos: 307
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood 17 Jun 2021, 00:12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
cici
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood, contaminated with the virus, from the nation's blood supply.

(A) in eliminating blood, contaminated with the virus, from the nation's blood supply

(B) in eliminating blood from the nation's blood supply that is contaminated with the virus

(C) in eliminating from the nation's blood supply blood that is contaminated with the virus

(D) to eliminate blood that is contaminated with the virus from the nation's blood supply

(E) to eliminate blood from the nation's blood supply that is contaminated with the virus
Show more

(A) in eliminating blood, contaminated with the virus, from the nation's blood supply - Essential information between commas is incorrect.

(B) in eliminating blood from the nation's blood supply that is contaminated with the virus - "supply" is not contaminated; "blood" is.

(C) in eliminating from the nation's blood supply blood that is contaminated with the virus - Correct.

(D) to eliminate blood that is contaminated with the virus from the nation's blood supply - the use of "to" distorts the meaning; it gives a meaning that the very purpose of the new test was to eliminate the contaminated blood. While this may be possible, it isn't the intended meaning.

(E) to eliminate blood from the nation's blood supply that is contaminated with the virus - same error as option D and B

C is correct.
User avatar
bidskamikaze
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2018
Last visit: 29 Oct 2022
Posts: 251
Own Kudos:
307
 [2]
Given Kudos: 160
Location: India
Schools: ESMT NUS '22 IIMA PGPX'23 NTU
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Schools: ESMT NUS '22 IIMA PGPX'23 NTU
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 251
Kudos: 307
 [2]
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood 17 Jun 2021, 00:16
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TorGmatGod
Dear Moderators,

GMATNinja generis BillyZ

I have question about choice(A).

If I change choice(A) by removing the last comma out to:
Quote:
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood, contaminated with the virus from the nation's blood supply.

COMMA + contaminated will modify preceding action clause "A new test AIDS has proved" instead of preceding noun "blood," right? That still doesn't make sense for meaning.

Thank you.
-tor
Show more

I am not an expert, but I think "...contaminated with the virus from the nation's blood supply" gives a wrong meaning.
It seems that the blood is contaminated from the virus THAT is from the Nation's blood bank.
That is, the VIRUS is from Nation's blood bank. This is not the intended meaning.
User avatar
Raman109
User avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Jul 2025
Posts: 706
Own Kudos:
212
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 706
Kudos: 212
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood 05 Nov 2023, 07:12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood, contaminated with the virus, from the nation's blood supply.

Option Elimination - What is the difference between "help in ING" and "help to"
"Help in" is used when we want to say that the assistance contributes to achieving a specific goal. E.g., The new software will help in improving productivity. Here, "the new software" contributes to achieving a specific goal: improving productivity.

"Help to" is used when we say that the assistance enables someone to perform a specific task. E.g., The tutor helps to develop student's problem-solving skills. Here, the assistance provided by the teacher enables the students to develop problem-solving skills)

Here, are we achieving something with the new test, or the new test is enabling someone to perform the task? Here, we are achieving a goal, and what is that goal, "eliminating blood that is contaminated with the virus."

But Idiom should be the last resort to eliminate the option. And we have enough issues in the wrong answers to eliminate them even if we don't know this distinction.

(A) in eliminating blood, contaminated with the virus, from the nation's blood supply - if we remove the non-essential modifier from the sentence, it reads like "eliminating blood from the nation's blood supply." Are we trying to eliminate all the blood? Thats nonsense. Wrong.

(B) in eliminating blood from the nation's blood supply that is contaminated with the virus - "that" modifies "blood supply." Are we saying that we are eliminating the blood supply? No. Wrong.

(C) in eliminating from the nation's blood supply blood that is contaminated with the virus - "that" correctly modifies blood. The modifier "from the nation's blood supply" is placed correctly after elimination. Though, in general readability, this is a poor way of saying. Nonetheless, grammatically and meaning-wise, it's ok.

(D) to eliminate blood that is contaminated with the virus from the nation's blood supply - the modifier "from the nation's blood supply" modifies "the virus" as if the virus is from the blood supply. Wrong.

(E) to eliminate blood from the nation's blood supply that is contaminated with the virus - "that" referring to "blood supply" creates the wrong meaning.

We can eliminate options just because of another issue, but if we know the distinction between "help in" and "help to," it's a plus.
User avatar
samc88
User avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2021
Last visit: 12 Jan 2026
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
4
Given Kudos: 71
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 15
Kudos: 4
A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood 29 Nov 2023, 06:37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Read through a number of comments here and thought I'd add my own split:

1st Filter: Idiom Help in / Aid in - this is a pretty common idiom and from what I have seen along side "Consider" one of the more frequently tested. ELIMINATE D and E

2nd Filter: A has "contaminated with the virus" as a non-essential modifier which isn't correct. It is needed to provide context to the sentence. ELIMINATE A

3rd Filter: B vs. C - in B the modifier "that is contaminated with the virus" modifies the blood supply not the blood within the blood supply. ELIMINATE B

If we slash and burn C we get the sentence:

"A new test....has proved helpful in eliminating... blood that is contaminated with the virus" KEEP C


A new test for AIDS has proved helpful in eliminating blood, contaminated with the virus, from the nation's blood supply.

(B) in eliminating blood from the nation's blood supply that is contaminated with the virus

(C) in eliminating from the nation's blood supply blood that is contaminated with the virus
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
AbhishekP220108
494 posts
bhanu29
358 posts