Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 02:15 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 02:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
reply2spg
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Last visit: 05 Oct 2010
Posts: 270
Own Kudos:
4,496
 [106]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 270
Kudos: 4,496
 [106]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
98
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
LogicGuru1
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Last visit: 28 May 2024
Posts: 469
Own Kudos:
2,595
 [43]
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Posts: 469
Kudos: 2,595
 [43]
36
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
arhumsid
Joined: 04 May 2014
Last visit: 14 Feb 2023
Posts: 193
Own Kudos:
694
 [7]
Given Kudos: 141
Status:One Last Shot !!!
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 630 Q44 V32
GMAT 2: 680 Q47 V35
Products:
GMAT 2: 680 Q47 V35
Posts: 193
Kudos: 694
 [7]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
tvrs09
Joined: 15 May 2015
Last visit: 21 Jul 2016
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
35
 [2]
Given Kudos: 3
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
Posts: 26
Kudos: 35
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi

A is the correct answer choice because it provides the reason which if true could potentially weaken the conclusion.
Since Manto relies on more outside sub-contractors to build Model Z than to build consolidated,the cancellation of the contract for Model Z does not provide a reason to sack it own employess.

Cheers!!
User avatar
deepak268
Joined: 27 Feb 2015
Last visit: 19 May 2023
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Concentration: General Management, Economics
GMAT 1: 630 Q42 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 630 Q42 V34
Posts: 29
Kudos: 57
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A shortage of orders for Manto Aircraft's airliners has led analysts to predict that the manufacturer will have to lay workers ,the new order that consolidated airlines has just made for 20 of Manto's model TX jets does not provide a reason for the analysts to revise their predictions ,because simultaneously with its new order , consolidated canceled its existing order for an equal number of manto's larger, more expensive model Z jets

which of the following ,if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Manto relies more heavily on outside subcontractors to provide the labor to manufacture the Model Z than it does the Model TX

B. The Manto employees who currently work to manufacture the model Z are Not proficient at manufacturing the model TX

C. Manto includes all required maintenance work for the first five years in the price of each jet it sells .

D. Manto has had to lay off workers several times within the past ten years but has typically rehired many of the workers when it subsequently received new orders

----Why cant the answer be B)
B says "The Manto employees who currently work to manufacture the model Z are Not proficient at manufacturing the model TX "
- ok! so employees can make Z but they cant make TX ..but no more Z to make they only have TX to make . So firing the employees will not help them in any way , because even if they fire them have to rehire some who knows to make TX . Instead they would train existing ones ( for that they would need few trainers) ..so this will lead to hiring . ok! even if not hiring at least it will no lead to job cuts. so the prediction wont hold true.

please help me understand why the above reasoning for B is wrong??
thanks
User avatar
LogicGuru1
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Last visit: 28 May 2024
Posts: 469
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Posts: 469
Kudos: 2,595
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
deepak268
A shortage of orders for Manto Aircraft's airliners has led analysts to predict that the manufacturer will have to lay workers ,the new order that consolidated airlines has just made for 20 of Manto's model TX jets does not provide a reason for the analysts to revise their predictions ,because simultaneously with its new order , consolidated canceled its existing order for an equal number of manto's larger, more expensive model Z jets

which of the following ,if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Manto relies more heavily on outside subcontractors to provide the labor to manufacture the Model Z than it does the Model TX

B. The Manto employees who currently work to manufacture the model Z are Not proficient at manufacturing the model TX

C. Manto includes all required maintenance work for the first five years in the price of each jet it sells .

D. Manto has had to lay off workers several times within the past ten years but has typically rehired many of the workers when it subsequently received new orders

----Why cant the answer be B)
B says "The Manto employees who currently work to manufacture the model Z are Not proficient at manufacturing the model TX "
- ok! so employees can make Z but they cant make TX ..but no more Z to make they only have TX to make . So firing the employees will not help them in any way , because even if they fire them have to rehire some who knows to make TX . Instead they would train existing ones ( for that they would need few trainers) ..so this will lead to hiring . ok! even if not hiring at least it will no lead to job cuts. so the prediction wont hold true.

please help me understand why the above reasoning for B is wrong??
thanks

We have to weaken the conclusion by showing that MANTO will not fire employee.

Your restaurant ( that is not making a lot of profit) is changing its menu from Chinese cuisine to Italian Cuisine. Half of your current chefs are Chinese and don't know how to make Italian cuisine. What is the most possible outcome. YOU MAY FIRE ALL THOSE CHINESE CHEFS BECAUSE A CHINESE CHEF HAS NO USE IN AN ITALIAN RESTAURANT.
Do the remaining italian chef need training. NO- they already know how to make Italian food.

Similarly some of the employee knows how to make model Z (Chinee food ) but they don't know how to make model TX (Italian). Now your contact is to make model TX.(restaurant to make Italian only) . Isn't there a high probability that those who don't know model Z will be fired.
Do you need to HIRE trainers. NO - because your other employees know how to make MODEL -TX. EVEN IF A TRAINER IS NEEDED, ONE OF THESE EMPLOYEES CAN BE MADE A TEMPORARY SUPERVISOR AND TRAINER

TO WEAKEN THE CONCLUSION WE HAVE TO SHOW MANTO AIRLINE WILL NOT FIRE THE EMPLOYEES.

B STILL HAS A POSSIBILITY OF FIRING.


Therefore B is not correct
avatar
Kezia9
Joined: 04 Oct 2017
Last visit: 23 Mar 2019
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 467
Posts: 54
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi!The reason I crossed out option E is that E talks about the consolidated airline's fleet which could have been ordered from other manufacturers and is not related to the employee lay off at Manto. Hope it helps.

Can we have some discussion on this one?...

I am not sure why E cannot be the answer?

~M14[/color][/quote]
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
77,001
 [4]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 77,001
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sandman13
Please reformat the question. Here you go:

A shortage of orders for Manto Aircraft’s airliners has led analysts to predict that the manufacturer will have to lay off workers. The new order that Consolidated Airlines has just made for 20 of Manto’s Model TX jets does not provide a reason for the analysts to revise their predictions, because simultaneously with its new order, Consolidated canceled its existing order for an equal number of Manto’s larger, more expensive Model Z jets.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Manto relies more heavily on outside subcontractors to provide the labor to manufacture the Model Z than it does for the Model TX.

B. The Manto employees who currently work to manufacture the Model Z are not proficient at manufacturing the Model TX.

C. Manto includes all required maintenance work for the first five years in the price of each jet it sells.

D. Manto has had to lay off workers several times within the past ten years but has typically rehired many of the workers when it subsequently received new orders.

E. A large number of the airliners in Consolidated’s fleet are at the beginning of their expected service life.

Prediction - Shortage of orders will lead to lay offs in Manto
Consolidated airline has ordered 20 Model TX jets.
Consolidated has cancelled its previous order of 20 Model Z jets.

Conclusion: The new order by Consolidated Airlines does not provide a reason to revise the prediction.

Basically the argument says that with the new order, nothing has changed since a previous similar order has been cancelled. So people will still be laid off. We need to weaken this.

A. Manto relies more heavily on outside subcontractors to provide the labor to manufacture the Model Z than it does for the Model TX.
This says that making Model Tx is different from making Model Z. Model Z needs more outside subcontractors while Model TX uses more in-house workforce. In we need to make Model Tis now, we will need the in-house workforce and hence lay offs may not happen.
This does weaken our conclusion. The new order may provide a reason for revision of the prediction.

B. The Manto employees who currently work to manufacture the Model Z are not proficient at manufacturing the Model TX.

This gives us a reason why some current workforce may be laid off (and new people hired or subcontractors used). Hence it does not weaken our conclusion.

C. Manto includes all required maintenance work for the first five years in the price of each jet it sells.

Irrelevant.

D. Manto has had to lay off workers several times within the past ten years but has typically rehired many of the workers when it subsequently received new orders.

Again, irrelevant. Will it lay off now or not is the question. Whether it will re-hire, is not relevant.

E. A large number of the airliners in Consolidated’s fleet are at the beginning of their expected service life.

Manto has got an order from Consolidated. Whether there will be more orders or not from Consolidated is irrelevant. We only have to judge the impact of this new order and cancelling of the old on our prediction.
If Consolidated's fleet is new and it is unlikely to give more orders, it doesn't matter. Manto can get orders from other airlines.
If Consolidated's fleet is old and it is likely to buy new planes, it again doesn't matter, It could buy from someone other than Manto.
All in all, the situation of Consolidated's fleet is irrelevant.

Answer (A)
User avatar
sriramsundaram91
Joined: 12 Mar 2018
Last visit: 18 Mar 2025
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 110
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
Posts: 47
Kudos: 89
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kezia9
Hi!The reason I crossed out option E is that E talks about the consolidated airline's fleet which could have been ordered from other manufacturers and is not related to the employee lay off at Manto. Hope it helps.

Can we have some discussion on this one?...

I am not sure why E cannot be the answer?

~M14[/color]
[/quote]

Maintenance can be done by some other company apart from Manto. Hence, Manto should still lose its employees.
User avatar
Road2700
Joined: 29 Mar 2019
Last visit: 27 Jan 2020
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I understand why A is correct but what I cannot seem to wrap my head around is why "LAY OFF" that the argument talks about cannot involve subcontractors. How am I able to deduce that it was only referring to lay off of full time workers rather than contractors. The way I see it, if lay off concern as includes laying off contracted workers then A will be incorrect. Please Help!!
User avatar
Raman109
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Jul 2025
Posts: 805
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 805
Kudos: 170
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option Elimination - This is a good question from the point of view of a business context. Sometimes, the things on the surface look seamless, but digging a bit deeper is always a good idea. No wonder why CR is so important in a business context. On the surface, this argument looks solid, but when you peel the onion in terms of Models, which is what option A does, it's pretty neat.

Option Elimination -

(A) Manto relies more heavily on outside subcontractors to provide the labor to manufacture the Model Z than it does the Model TX - ok. So we don't need to fire people, which weakens the conclusion.

(B) The Manto employees who currently work to manufacture the model Z are not proficient at manufacturing the model TX - Strengthener.

(C) Manto includes all required maintenance work for the first five years in the price of each jet it sells . - These are normally called annual maintenance contracts and are standard in the manufacturing world but outside the scope of the argument.

(D) Manto has had to lay off workers several times within the past ten years but has typically rehired many of the workers when it subsequently received new orders. Changes the reference point. We are interested in the current and not in the past. The scope of the argument is to weaken the analyst's prediction about firing employees based on the current situation wherein the orders are low, and some C airlines canceled 20 and gave orders for another 20. Distortion.

(E) A large number of the airliners in consolidated is fleet are at the beginning of their expected service life. - C's fleet at the beginning or end of life is irrelevant to the scope of the argument. Out of scope.
User avatar
PReciSioN
Joined: 17 Dec 2023
Last visit: 14 Apr 2025
Posts: 95
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 47
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 795 Q90 V90 DI88
GMAT Focus 1: 795 Q90 V90 DI88
Posts: 95
Kudos: 77
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Although A is the best of the bunch, I still don't particularly like it. Just because the company uses more outside subcontractors to make Model Z than model TX, doesn't strongly imply that it uses more in-house people for model TX. The argument does say that Model Z is larger, more expensive. It could jolly well be the case that Model Z uses both - more outside subcontractors as well as more in-house people to make the plane than model TX.

Thoughts?­
User avatar
boybread5
Joined: 29 Dec 2016
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT Focus 1: 625 Q86 V80 DI77
GMAT Focus 2: 665 Q81 V89 DI79
GMAT Focus 3: 635 Q83 V78 DI83
GMAT Focus 4: 755 Q88 V90 DI85
GPA: 3.92
Products:
GMAT Focus 4: 755 Q88 V90 DI85
Posts: 24
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Bunuel can you edit the original argument so it has the proper punctuation? Not to nitpick, but the run-on sentence structure adds some lag time in understanding.
reply2spg
A shortage of orders for Manto Aircraft's airliners has led analysts to predict that the manufacturer will have to lay off workers, the new order that consolidated airlines has just made for 20 of Manto's model TX jets does not provide a reason for the analysts to revise their predictions, because simultaneously with its new order, consolidated canceled its existing order for an equal number of Manto's larger, more expensive model Z jets.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?


(A) Manto relies more heavily on outside subcontractors to provide the labor to manufacture the Model Z than it does the Model TX

(B) The Manto employees who currently work to manufacture the model Z are not proficient at manufacturing the model TX

(C) Manto includes all required maintenance work for the first five years in the price of each jet it sells .

(D) Manto has had to lay off workers several times within the past ten years but has typically rehired many of the workers when it subsequently received new orders.

(E) A large number of the airliners in consolidated is fleet are at the beginning of their expected service life.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts