Last visit was: 12 Jul 2025, 09:35 It is currently 12 Jul 2025, 09:35
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
obs23
Joined: 06 Feb 2013
Last visit: 03 Jan 2015
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
270
 [18]
Given Kudos: 35
Posts: 35
Kudos: 270
 [18]
Kudos
Add Kudos
18
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Phoenix72
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Last visit: 06 Oct 2013
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
51
 [3]
Given Kudos: 29
GPA: 3.5
WE 1: Information Technology(Retail)
Posts: 67
Kudos: 51
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sarang31
Joined: 13 Mar 2014
Last visit: 05 Jun 2014
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
8
 [2]
Given Kudos: 4
GPA: 4
Posts: 17
Kudos: 8
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
kinghyts
Joined: 22 Sep 2012
Last visit: 26 Apr 2015
Posts: 108
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 49
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 108
Kudos: 149
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I feel A) is a better choice than C). Here are the reasons :

1. C) doesn't seem to be correct because the "and" is a parallel marker should express two independent ideas, while "did a volte-face" and "backed" are not independent ideas. Also, "saying" should be preceded by a comma, as rightly pointed out by obs23 and sarang31, to express the relation between the 2 ideas.

2. A) seems correct because "by backing ... and saying.. " refers to how the "the football team captain did a volte face".


Thanks
User avatar
tuanquang269
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Last visit: 18 May 2018
Posts: 376
Own Kudos:
1,632
 [2]
Given Kudos: 44
Status:Flying over the cloud!
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
obs23
A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying it would have to be used if the standard of umpiring keeps going down
A. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying
B. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the controversial innovation was backed by the football team captain when he did a volte-face on Thursday saying that
C. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and backed the controversial innovation saying that
D. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain had a volte-face on Thursday and is backing the controversial innovation by saying that
E. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and has now decided to back the controversial innovation when he said that

I just wanted to clarify, in the correct option does not "saying that" have to be preceded by a comma? Otherwise we have "innovation saying" or it is correct as is? If it is correct, then please explain.

Initially, I also have confusion as you in the lack of comma before "saying that". However, if put comma before "saying that", the sentence will be ambiguous because "saying that..." will modifies preceded subject and clause before comma, including both two action "did a volte-face ..." and "backed...", while in the intent meaning, "saying that..." only modifies action "backed..."

Below is my process of elimination:

(A) backing paralleled with saying => not intent meaning
(B) wrong modifier the controversial innovation
(C) no error
(D) past tense go with present continue tense is strange to me
(E) not intent meaning "has now decided to back... when said that..."
avatar
dransa
Joined: 29 May 2013
Last visit: 06 Sep 2015
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
20
 [1]
Given Kudos: 51
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 47
Kudos: 20
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Phoenix72
Agree that C is correct but without commait seems its not the captain but the innovation saying. I believe a comma is needed before Saying to modify the clause.

Please confirm!
I feel the same , saying should be followed by a comma to make sense.
User avatar
krikatkat
Joined: 15 Apr 2014
Last visit: 22 Mar 2016
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
33
 [1]
Given Kudos: 117
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GPA: 3.84
Posts: 10
Kudos: 33
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi all,

can you plz explane why D is wrong?

thanks :)
avatar
dransa
Joined: 29 May 2013
Last visit: 06 Sep 2015
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
20
 [4]
Given Kudos: 51
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 47
Kudos: 20
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
krikatkat
Hi all,

can you plz explane why D is wrong?

thanks :)
@krikatkat
Hi,
The question stem looks as follows:

A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying it would have to be used if the standard of umpiring keeps going down
A. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying >> should be followed by "that"
B. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the controversial innovation was backed by the football team captain when he did a volte-face on Thursday saying that >>> The controversial innovation is not " A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS)"
C. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and backed the controversial innovation saying that >>> Correct
D. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain had a volte-face on Thursday and is backing the controversial innovation by saying that >>> Multiple errors : Error1 -> Verb tenses are not parallel in the series, showing a sequence and there by changing the original meaning of the sentence. Error2: The original sentence reads "the football team captain did a volte-face " , where as option D reads "the football team captain had a volte-face " both have different meaning. The change in meaning is unwarranted because the meaning of the original sentence is unambiguous.
E. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and has now decided to back the controversial innovation when he said that >>>> Change in tense in parallel verbs is changing the meaning of sentence.


Kudos if my post helped
User avatar
idontknowwhy94
Joined: 03 Oct 2016
Last visit: 15 Mar 2017
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Concentration: Technology, General Management
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
Posts: 61
Kudos: 301
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying it would have to be used if the standard of umpiring keeps going down.

A. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying

the ||'sm shown here backing and saying is not correct and changes the meaning of sentence

B. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the controversial innovation was backed by the football team captain when he did a volte-face on Thursday saying that - Wrong modifier

C. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and backed the controversial innovation saying that

Plain and simple . and correct too

D. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain had a volte-face on Thursday and is backing the controversial innovation by saying that

had and is backing - clearly not ||

E. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and has now decided to back the controversial innovation when he said that

has now decided and when he said - not required
User avatar
sleepynut
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Last visit: 18 Jul 2017
Posts: 162
Own Kudos:
90
 [1]
Given Kudos: 905
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: Q167 V147
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: Q167 V147
Posts: 162
Kudos: 90
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I also couldn't decide between A and C.Anyway both seem weird.
Moreover,this question is considered flawed from one of the Manhattan's proponents.

Refer to : https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... 16749.html
avatar
adityapareshshah
Joined: 17 Apr 2016
Last visit: 14 Nov 2017
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 254
Posts: 61
Kudos: 44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
idontknowwhy94
A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying it would have to be used if the standard of umpiring keeps going down.

A. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying

the ||'sm shown here backing and saying is not correct and changes the meaning of sentence

B. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the controversial innovation was backed by the football team captain when he did a volte-face on Thursday saying that - Wrong modifier

C. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and backed the controversial innovation saying that

Plain and simple . and correct too

D. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain had a volte-face on Thursday and is backing the controversial innovation by saying that

had and is backing - clearly not ||

E. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and has now decided to back the controversial innovation when he said that

has now decided and when he said - not required


Can you please explain why parallelism between saying and backing is wrong in Option A?
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,346
 [3]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,346
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For a discussion, I am unable to appreciate Aristotle's logic implied in their OA.

Between A and C: The Captain, as far as I see, did only one thing namely a somersault; and how did he do that? by retracting from an earlier stand and saying something different now. So backing out and saying are modifiers of the volte-face act, and they do not merit a verb. But C implies that he did two things -- 1. did a volte face and 2. said some blah, blah. This interpretation is logically wrong. IMO, C is out.

In GMAT, Semantics is not secondary to Syntax
User avatar
daftypatty
Joined: 08 Jul 2017
Last visit: 10 Feb 2018
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 17
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am also struggling to understand choosing between C vs A. I understand that A has parallelism, which is incorrect. However, in C, shouldn't "backed ..." be a subordinate clause to the "did a volte face... " statement? They are not independent - he did a volte face by backing ......

Thoughts?
User avatar
sachinsavailable
Joined: 13 May 2018
Last visit: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 453
Posts: 39
Kudos: 49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
For a discussion, I am unable to appreciate Aristotle's logic implied in their OA.

Between A and C: The Captain, as far as I see, did only one thing namely a somersault; and how did he do that? by retracting from an earlier stand and saying something different now. So backing out and saying are modifiers of the volte-face act, and they do not merit a verb. But C implies that he did two things -- 1. did a volte face and 2. said some blah, blah. This interpretation is logically wrong. IMO, C is out.

In GMAT, Semantics is not secondary to Syntax


Dear Daagh Sir,

Thank you for the clarification and this is why i also chose A as the answer to the said question. However after i read few comments from other members they seem to have eliminated A just because it didn't had "That" at the end of the underlined sentence.

Kindly guide.
User avatar
sayan640
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Last visit: 12 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,223
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 783
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Products:
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Posts: 1,223
Kudos: 734
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
obs23
A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying it would have to be used if the standard of umpiring keeps going down

A. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying
B. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the controversial innovation was backed by the football team captain when he did a volte-face on Thursday saying that
C. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and backed the controversial innovation saying that
D. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain had a volte-face on Thursday and is backing the controversial innovation by saying that
E. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and has now decided to back the controversial innovation when he said that

Source: Aristotle Prep SC Grail #26

I just wanted to clarify, in the correct option does not "saying that" have to be preceded by a comma? Otherwise we have "innovation saying" or it is correct as is? If it is correct, then please explain.

VeritasKarishma GMATGuruNY GMATNinja generis
Can you please provide the reasoning as to why one should eliminate option A and choose option C ?
User avatar
ravigupta2912
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2019
Last visit: 16 Feb 2025
Posts: 726
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 84
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q46 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 2.58
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Eliminated C because of lack of comma :-/ really hate poorly constructed questions :-/

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
iamap07
Joined: 19 Oct 2022
Last visit: 27 Apr 2023
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
GPA: 4
Products:
Posts: 12
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Concepts Tested – Modification, Subordination
A – This incorrectly makes 'backing' and 'saying' parallel but the idea is to make 'saying' subordinated to the previous clause because the captain is not doing two things. He is only doing one thing, which is 'backing', and he is doing this by 'saying' something.
B – The modifying phrase at the beginning of the sentence should be followed by the subject of the sentence which is the football captain and not the controversial innovation
D – The use of the possessive 'had' is incorrect. The football captain didn‘t have anything, he did something.
E – Poor sentence construction at the end – 'has now decided to back the controversial innovation when he said that' – the use of 'when‘ is incorrect
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts