Last visit was: 19 May 2025, 13:40 It is currently 19 May 2025, 13:40
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 May 2025
Posts: 101,531
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93,557
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 101,531
Kudos: 725,522
 [61]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
56
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
Prateekj05
Joined: 28 Nov 2017
Last visit: 22 Jun 2021
Posts: 133
Own Kudos:
275
 [22]
Given Kudos: 101
Location: India
Posts: 133
Kudos: 275
 [22]
15
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
ErikLewe
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Last visit: 15 Nov 2019
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
56
 [1]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Sweden
Concentration: Finance, Statistics
Schools: Wharton '22
Schools: Wharton '22
Posts: 54
Kudos: 56
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
yash312
Joined: 28 Aug 2018
Last visit: 24 Feb 2025
Posts: 160
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 160
Kudos: 170
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer is option B
As per the meaning of sentence, it states according to HDT, majority rules not because it is right but because it is strong
Option A:no parallelism
C: parallelism issue
D: phrase and clause can't be parallel
E: parallelism issue

IMO B

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
Darshi04
Joined: 08 Oct 2018
Last visit: 08 Apr 2019
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 62
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Brand Management (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Posts: 57
Kudos: 76
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ErikLewe
Bunuel

Project SC Butler: Day 44: Sentence Correction (SC2)



For SC butler Questions Click Here

According to Henry David Thoreau, the reason a majority is allowed to rule is not that it is more likely to be right, but because it is stronger.


(A) the reason a majority is allowed to rule is not that it is more likely to be right, but because it is stronger

(B) a majority is allowed to rule not because it is more likely to be right, but because it is stronger

(C) the reason for majority rule is not because they are more likely to be right, they are stronger

(D) the majority is allowed to rule because of its strength, not because it is more likely to be right

(E) the reason why the majority rules is that it is strong, not because it is likely to be right

subject comma rule leaves B and D. D is not parallell. b is the answer


Hi,

Can you please explain why D isn't parallel?
avatar
bravoseries
Joined: 19 Dec 2018
Last visit: 03 Jan 2019
Posts: 6
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 6
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(B) a majority is allowed to rule not because it is more likely to be right, but because it is stronger

That's the right answer definitely. "it" is referring to "majority".
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,232
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,232
Kudos: 5,818
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

Project SC Butler: Day 44: Sentence Correction (SC2)



For SC butler Questions Click Here

According to Henry David Thoreau, the reason a majority is allowed to rule is not that it is more likely to be right, but because it is stronger.


(A) the reason a majority is allowed to rule is not that it is more likely to be right, but because it is stronger

(B) a majority is allowed to rule not because it is more likely to be right, but because it is stronger

(C) the reason for majority rule is not because they are more likely to be right, they are stronger

(D) the majority is allowed to rule because of its strength, not because it is more likely to be right

(E) the reason why the majority rules is that it is strong, not because it is likely to be right

A - is wrong because of lack of parallelism in “the reason….but because”.
C - is wrong because of the use of ‘they’ for ‘majority’.
D - is wrong because it lacks parallelism in “because of its strength….not because it is more likely”
E - repeats the mistake in A.
B - is the best choice as it conserves parallelism by using “because it is…because it is”
User avatar
crazi4ib
Joined: 19 Feb 2014
Last visit: 03 Apr 2020
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 29
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DmitryFarber Bunuel aragonn

I believe I read in Manhattan Prep's SC guide that to have a comparative word like "stronger" without the thing that it is being compared to, is incorrect on the GMAT. I eliminated the correct answer for this reason. Can anyone please explain why this usage is OK for the correct answer in this case? Thank you!
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,482
Own Kudos:
29,909
 [2]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,482
Kudos: 29,909
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
crazi4ib
DmitryFarber Bunuel aragonn

I believe I read in Manhattan Prep's SC guide that to have a comparative word like "stronger" without the thing that it is being compared to, is incorrect on the GMAT. I eliminated the correct answer for this reason. Can anyone please explain why this usage is OK for the correct answer in this case? Thank you!

This is not necessarily a problem. Yes, ordinarily in a comparison, we have to specify both terms --- it makes absolutely no sense to say "John is smarter" if we don't know --- smarter than whom? In that example, the omission of the second term of the comparison is egregious, totally unacceptable ---- it leaves a gap the reader has no way to fill in on her own.

By contrast, when we speak of the "majority" of a group, that automatically implies --- there must be a "minority", all the other people who are in the group but not in the majority. This second term does not need to be named explicitly in the sentence because they are automatically implied. The GMAT will occasionally do this on a more challenging SC question --- it will name one group (e.g. "those who excel in writing") and construct a comparison without a second term, because the nature of the group automatically implies others who are not in the group.

Does this make sense?
Mike :-)
avatar
livfcind
Joined: 03 Aug 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2022
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 171
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE:Operations (Aerospace and Defense)
Posts: 62
Kudos: 74
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
crazi4ib
DmitryFarber Bunuel aragonn

I believe I read in Manhattan Prep's SC guide that to have a comparative word like "stronger" without the thing that it is being compared to, is incorrect on the GMAT. I eliminated the correct answer for this reason. Can anyone please explain why this usage is OK for the correct answer in this case? Thank you!

This is not necessarily a problem. Yes, ordinarily in a comparison, we have to specify both terms --- it makes absolutely no sense to say "John is smarter" if we don't know --- smarter than whom? In that example, the omission of the second term of the comparison is egregious, totally unacceptable ---- it leaves a gap the reader has no way to fill in on her own.

By contrast, when we speak of the "majority" of a group, that automatically implies --- there must be a "minority", all the other people who are in the group but not in the majority. This second term does not need to be named explicitly in the sentence because they are automatically implied. The GMAT will occasionally do this on a more challenging SC question --- it will name one group (e.g. "those who excel in writing") and construct a comparison without a second term, because the nature of the group automatically implies others who are not in the group.

Does this make sense?
Mike :-)

Why is E not parallel ? The structure seems parallel.
avatar
jaisonsunny77
Joined: 05 Jan 2019
Last visit: 25 Aug 2021
Posts: 459
Own Kudos:
373
 [2]
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 459
Kudos: 373
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
According to Henry David Thoreau, the reason a majority is allowed to rule is not that it is more likely to be right, but because it is stronger.

(A) the reason a majority is allowed to rule is not that it is more likely to be right, but because it is stronger
- (A) introduces the following structure: .... [no that...], [but because...]. the clause that appears after the conjunction ''not'' is a 'that clause', whereas the clause that appears after the conjunction ''but'' is a subordinate clause. Since the clauses of the Not-But conjunction combination are not of the same structure, (A) is incorrect.

(B) a majority is allowed to rule not because it is more likely to be right, but because it is stronger - has no error. Hence, (B) is the right answer choice.

(C) the reason for majority rule is not because they are more likely to be right, they are stronger
- the demonstrative pronoun ''they'' does not have a clear antecedent.

(D) the majority is allowed to rule because of its strength, not because it is more likely to be right
- ''because of....'' is a prepositional phrase that cannot explain the reasons for an observed phenomenon.

(E) the reason why the majority rules is that it is strong, not because it is likely to be right
- 'the reason why'' is a redundant structure.
avatar
GEEMAN1
Joined: 05 Jun 2019
Last visit: 23 Feb 2024
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 319
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A comparative form of verb 'stronger' is used, which, as per GMAT rules, require 'than' also to be used with it.
Then , how is option (B) correct.
avatar
prakhar992
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 05 May 2019
Last visit: 26 Dec 2022
Posts: 82
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 133
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 2.8
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 82
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
crazi4ib
DmitryFarber Bunuel aragonn

I believe I read in Manhattan Prep's SC guide that to have a comparative word like "stronger" without the thing that it is being compared to, is incorrect on the GMAT. I eliminated the correct answer for this reason. Can anyone please explain why this usage is OK for the correct answer in this case? Thank you!

This is not necessarily a problem. Yes, ordinarily in a comparison, we have to specify both terms --- it makes absolutely no sense to say "John is smarter" if we don't know --- smarter than whom? In that example, the omission of the second term of the comparison is egregious, totally unacceptable ---- it leaves a gap the reader has no way to fill in on her own.

By contrast, when we speak of the "majority" of a group, that automatically implies --- there must be a "minority", all the other people who are in the group but not in the majority. This second term does not need to be named explicitly in the sentence because they are automatically implied. The GMAT will occasionally do this on a more challenging SC question --- it will name one group (e.g. "those who excel in writing") and construct a comparison without a second term, because the nature of the group automatically implies others who are not in the group.

Does this make sense?
Mike :-)

Hello mikemcgarry,
Doesn't the sentence should be phrased such as "According to Henry, reason ....is..."

Is it right to structure sentences such as "According to Henry, majority"?

Also, what is the exact reason to eliminate Option E? Is it because of of the ambiguity of pronoun "E"?
User avatar
Oppenheimer1945
Joined: 16 Jul 2019
Last visit: 19 May 2025
Posts: 801
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 223
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V76 DI80
GPA: 7.81
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
According to Henry David Thoreau, the reason a majority is allowed to rule is not that it is more likely to be right, but because it is stronger.


(A) the reason a majority is allowed to rule is not that it is more likely to be right, but because it is stronger
not X but Y , reason + because is redundant
here X is "that it is ..." clause not parallel to Y ("it is stronger") - eliminate[/color]

(B) a majority is allowed to rule not because it is more likely to be right, but because it is stronger
not X but Y,
X - because it is more likely to be right
Y-because it is stronger
parallel & correct


(C) the reason for majority rule is not because they are more likely to be right, they are stronger
Pronoun "they" is ambiguous .

(D) the majority is allowed to rule because of its strength, not because it is more likely to be right
“because of its strength" is not parallel to "not because it is more likely"

(E) the reason why the majority rules is that it is strong, not because it is likely to be right
reason + because is redundant
User avatar
Krishnahelps
Joined: 15 Nov 2020
Last visit: 02 Apr 2025
Posts: 134
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,687
Schools: ISB '27 (A)
Schools: ISB '27 (A)
Posts: 134
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can you please help me understand what is the error in Option choice-E?

Thanks
User avatar
ankit**
Joined: 10 Nov 2023
Last visit: 24 Sep 2024
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Location: India
Posts: 7
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What is the error in E option
How would we chose a between E and B

Can someone explain
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,294
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,294
Kudos: 939
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7305 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts