GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Jul 2018, 16:17

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Posts: 400
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 23 Sep 2017, 02:44
2
27
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

54% (01:28) correct 46% (01:42) wrong based on 1317 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people's tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentrating on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?

(A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.
(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.
(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.
(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.
(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.

Source: LSAT

Originally posted by jyotsnasarabu on 12 Nov 2006, 10:22.
Last edited by broall on 23 Sep 2017, 02:44, edited 3 times in total.
Reformatted question
Most Helpful Community Reply
4 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 815
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 24 May 2013, 10:54
4
8
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentrating on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.
Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?
(A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.
(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.
(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.
(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.
(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.

Please give reasons for ur choice....

Originally posted by vineetgupta on 04 Dec 2006, 12:43.
Last edited by Zarrolou on 24 May 2013, 10:54, edited 1 time in total.
Added OA
General Discussion
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 696
Location: Dallas, Texas
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Nov 2006, 11:14
So now CRs are coming with 4 options ?

C !
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2005
Posts: 442
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Nov 2006, 11:34
Swagatalakshmi wrote:
So now CRs are coming with 4 options ?

C !


LOL! You are hilarious man :-D
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 77
Location: New York
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Dec 2006, 12:55
1
C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.

Since the advertisers withdrew even when they knew their product sales would increase if they stayed, they surely had moral reasons, supporting the argument. No?
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 660
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Dec 2006, 13:53
1
Yes it's C
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 409
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Dec 2006, 14:14
1
sujayb wrote:
C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.

Since the advertisers withdrew even when they knew their product sales would increase if they stayed, they surely had moral reasons, supporting the argument. No?


yes. C
1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1330
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Dec 2006, 18:18
1
Not getting what C is trying to say
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 64
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Dec 2006, 18:27
1
sujayb wrote:
C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.

Since the advertisers withdrew even when they knew their product sales would increase if they stayed, they surely had moral reasons, supporting the argument. No?


I picked A. But your explanation proves C provides a better reason than A.
C is a better choice
_________________

------------------------------------------------------
"The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams"

4 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 238
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Dec 2006, 21:55
4
2
C

vineetgupta wrote:
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentrating on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.
Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?
(A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.
does not necessarily mean they morally disapproved. Could be because they did not have the right audience with the new publication(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.
irrelevant. we are talking about advertisers who were advertising in the current publication earlier
(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.
Since the advertisers sales will drop now since they withdrew the advertisements, they must have done so on moral grounds
(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.
again shows that advertisers might have witrhdrawn to avoid loss. weakens the argument
(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.
again could be related to profits rather than moral values.

Please give reasons for ur choice....
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 516
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Sep 2007, 04:52
1
jyotsnasarabu wrote:
10. Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentrating on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.
Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?
(A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.
(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.
(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.
(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.
(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.


Yup the answer is C.
First we will have to find the Assumption. The assumption here is that Advertisers switched their ads. only on the basis of morality though it would impact their product sales.

Only option C seconds that..
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1350
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Sep 2007, 04:58
uvs_mba wrote:
Swagatalakshmi wrote:
So now CRs are coming with 4 options ?

C !


LOL! You are hilarious man :-D


:-)))
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2007
Posts: 69
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Sep 2007, 06:32
Here you have to be careful i understanding the argument. in the beginning it mentions that their motive is based on moral / profits.
So "C" hows the profit criteria.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 5
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Apr 2010, 06:36
Can anyone tell me what is the conclusion for this argument? Just wanted to analyse what all things are required to strengthen the argument and whether the strengthen here is achieved by strengthening the argument?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: One last try =,=
Joined: 11 Jun 2010
Posts: 135
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Apr 2011, 19:12
I am too confused about the conclusion of this argument. I wonder whether the conclusion is: Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material. or There is evidence that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations

Let me try a "therefore test":
A)
Because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material, some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication.
Therefore, some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations
B)
Some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations
Therefore, some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.

A makes more sense to me.
_________________

There can be Miracles when you believe

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2010
Posts: 8
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Apr 2011, 21:53
sujayb wrote:
C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.

Since the advertisers withdrew even when they knew their product sales would increase if they stayed, they surely had moral reasons, supporting the argument. No?



i went for a ..butnow i understand why c is correct.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 213
Schools: UNC Duke Kellogg
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jul 2011, 11:26
C it is...

A and D are trap answers...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 May 2011
Posts: 224
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jul 2011, 11:49
(A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers. INCORRECT this statement does not give us any information about the reason for switching (neither financial nor moral)
(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication. INCORRECT unrelated - we are not concerned about other advertisers
(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew. CORRECT if advertisers were not concerned financially then they must be morally motivated
(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence. - INCORRECT readers are irrelevant to the argument
(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group. INCORRECT income groups is irrelevant information
3 KUDOS received
Math Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1900
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jul 2011, 12:23
3
vineetgupta wrote:
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people's tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentrating on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.
Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?
(A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.
(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.
(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.
(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.
(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.

Please give reasons for ur choice....


A is caused only by B and C.
Conclusion: A was caused by B.
Assumption or strength: We know that C was not present OR C definitely didn't cause A this time.

Likewise:
Advertisers are motivated by MORAL and MONEY.
Conclusion: Advertisers withdrew from publication because they were morally motivated.

Attack: Why it can't be MONEY?
Answer to attack: Because, they would have most certainly earned more money had they chosen to advertise in the new publication. Yet, they didn't choose to advertise in new publication. Thus, the only remaining factor is moral that must have dictated their decision.

Ans: "C"
_________________

~fluke

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Apr 2011
Posts: 261
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jul 2011, 06:48
Damn it! I picked A too but C is a better choice.
_________________

Powerscore CR Bible Full Chapter Notes | Easily Extend Vocabulary List with Google Dictionary

Please kudo me if you found my post useful. Thanks!!! :)

Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous   [#permalink] 20 Jul 2011, 06:48

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 48 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.