GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Oct 2018, 07:22

Fuqua EA Calls Expected Soon:

Join us in the chat | track the decision tracker | See forum posts/summary


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Mar 2010
Posts: 51
Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Apr 2012, 02:59
6
7
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

74% (00:51) correct 26% (01:06) wrong based on 357 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer from what remained of the inscription that the priest Zonainos was buried in the crypt.


(A) Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer

(B) Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists had inferred

(C) Although it had been partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer

(D) Partially destroyed though it had been, the archaeologists had been able to infer

(E) Destroyed partially, the archaeologists were able to infer

_________________

MGMAT CAT MATH http://gmatclub.com/forum/mgmat-cat-math-144609.html
MGMAT SC SUMMARY: http://gmatclub.com/forum/mgmat-sc-summary-144610.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Feb 2012
Posts: 130
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.67
Re: Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Apr 2012, 23:28
1
1
Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer from what remained of the inscription that the priest Zonainos was buried in the crypt.
(A) Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer
wrong modifier. " partially destroyed " modifies "the archaeologists" in this case.
(B) Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists had inferred
wrong modifier. " partially destroyed " modifies "the archaeologists" in this case.
(C) Although it had been partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer
Correct
(D) Partially destroyed though it had been, the archaeologists had been able to infer
Wrong tense. Past perfect indicates sth happens before sth else in the past.
(E) Destroyed partially, the archaeologists were able to infer
wrong modifier. " partially destroyed " modifies "the archaeologists" in this case.
_________________

Kudos!!!... If you think I help you in some ways....

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Mar 2010
Posts: 51
Re: Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Apr 2012, 00:18
Its not the archaeologists who are destroyed. So I am only looking to remove the ambiguity by either providing what is destroyed, or clarifying the noun / pronoun that the modifier applies to.
_________________

MGMAT CAT MATH http://gmatclub.com/forum/mgmat-cat-math-144609.html
MGMAT SC SUMMARY: http://gmatclub.com/forum/mgmat-sc-summary-144610.html

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 254
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Re: Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Apr 2012, 00:31
C is correct: uses correct tense with proper clarity
_________________

Practice Practice and practice...!!

If my reply /analysis is helpful-->please press KUDOS
If there's a loophole in my analysis--> suggest measures to make it airtight.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 47
Location: Ukraine
Schools: LBS '14 (M)
GMAT 1: 650 Q44 V35
WE: Corporate Finance (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Re: Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Apr 2012, 02:10
monir6000 wrote:
Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer from what remained of the inscription that the priest Zonainos was buried in the crypt.
(A) Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer
(B) Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists had inferred
(C) Although it had been partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer
(D) Partially destroyed though it had been, the archaeologists had been able to infer
(E) Destroyed partially, the archaeologists were able to infer

Kudos if u like it...


I am confused with times in the OA C:
"it had been partially destroyed" and then "the priest Zonainos was buried in the crypt"

It seems that the crypt was destroyed before Zonainos was buried...

could you explain?

thank!
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Apr 2012
Posts: 2
Re: Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Apr 2012, 06:08
1
Although it had been partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer


It was destroyed before the archaeologists were able to infer. Not before the Zonainos was buried.


I hope this helps!!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 211
Reviews Badge
Re: Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Apr 2012, 08:46
JubtaGubar wrote:
monir6000 wrote:
Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer from what remained of the inscription that the priest Zonainos was buried in the crypt.
(A) Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer
(B) Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists had inferred
(C) Although it had been partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer
(D) Partially destroyed though it had been, the archaeologists had been able to infer
(E) Destroyed partially, the archaeologists were able to infer

Kudos if u like it...


I am confused with times in the OA C:
"it had been partially destroyed" and then "the priest Zonainos was buried in the crypt"

It seems that the crypt was destroyed before Zonainos was buried...

could you explain?

thank!


To solve, You can ignore the last modifier. Sentence is Although it had been partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer from what remained of the inscription

Now onto your question
inscription that the priest Zonainos was buried in the crypt describes the matter on inscription
the priest Zonainos was buried in the crypt - actual words written - this is what is inscribed.
Haas Thread Master
User avatar
Joined: 23 Aug 2010
Posts: 199
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.3
WE: Design (Other)
Reviews Badge
Re: Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Apr 2012, 10:47
I would go for C

Correct use of Tense and correct subject-verb agreement
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: Getting strong now, I'm so strong now!!!
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 457
Location: India
GPA: 3.32
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2013, 12:07
2
1
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 May 2015
Posts: 219
Location: South Africa
Concentration: International Business, Organizational Behavior
GPA: 3.49
WE: Web Development (Insurance)
Re: Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Feb 2016, 05:16
C is no doubt the best among the lot, but a doubt.

Here "it" should be referring to the inscription, but it's the object in the second sentence. Is it correct? I don't think so.


Look at "it" this way:

Even though it was big, the bull still found a way through the hole.

So isn't "it" confusing here?

Is it referring to the bull or the hole?

I believe this question is wrong.
_________________

Kudos if I helped ;)

Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3031
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Feb 2016, 09:28
1
1
arirux92 wrote:
C is no doubt the best among the lot, but a doubt.

Here "it" should be referring to the inscription, but it's the object in the second sentence. Is it correct? I don't think so.


Look at "it" this way:

Even though it was big, the bull still found a way through the hole.

So isn't "it" confusing here?

Is it referring to the bull or the hole?

I believe this question is wrong.


Hi arirux92, Please have a look at my view below:

If there is one pronoun and one possible noun antecedent, it does not matter whether the noun antecedent and the pronoun are both subjects, both objects or one subject/ one object. In such case, a pronoun subject of one clause may refer to a noun object of another clause. On the other hand, a pronoun object of one clause may refer to a noun subject of another clause.

However ambiguity may arise when there are 2 antecedents and 1 pronoun. Nonetheless, if there is one pronoun subject in one clause and one possible noun antecedent in subject and one possible noun antecedent in object in another clause, the subject pronoun would unambiguously refer to the subject noun by virtue of parallelism. In your example the pronoun it unambiguously refers to bull - this usage is accepted in GMAT.

In the question above, ambiguity does not arise at all (between archaeologists and inscription), since there is one pronoun it and only one possible (singular) antecedent inscription. It is not wrong that the pronoun is subject in one clause and the antecedent is in predicate of another.

Please note that ambiguity may still arise between crypt and inscription. However because of the relative distances of the nouns inscription and crypt from the pronoun it - moreover crypt is in an altogether separate subordinate clause starting with that - the pronoun it still refers, although slightly ambiguously to inscription. This usage is also acceptable and although slightly ambiguous, not sufficient to eliminate an answer.
SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1214
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 May 2018, 19:09
Old question though want to have discussion on this. Clearly all other choices are bad, but C is not the best way to say this.
_________________

Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

Want to improve your Score:
GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able &nbs [#permalink] 21 May 2018, 19:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Although partially destroyed, the archaeologists were able to infer

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.