VyshakhR1995 wrote:
Although the e-commerce industry in Inasia is not profitable as yet, as most companies in the sector suffer from challenges such as inefficient supply chains and insufficient funds, Nile Corporation, a world leader in the e-commerce sector has recently made its foray into the Inasian market. Its decision to enter the market is correct regardless of all the opposing theories. Most analysts believe that e-commerce will gain a sizeable market share in Inasia as more young people with higher disposable incomes will start buying products online over the next five years.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A) The first is a belief that does not dispute the position taken by the argument; the second is that position
B) The first is a belief that goes against the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a judgment that favors the main conclusion of the argument.
C) The first is an observation that is not disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion that supports the main conclusion of the argument.
D) The first is evidence used to support the position that the argument does not oppose; the second is a belief that supports the position that the argument seeks to establish.
E) The first is the explanation for a belief that the author agrees with; the second is a prediction in favor of the main conclusion of the argument.
Currently e-com is not profitable because
most companies in the sector suffer from challenges such as inefficient supply chains and insufficient funds.Nile is entering the market.
Most analysts believe that
e-commerce will gain a sizeable market share in future because of younger people with more income.
Conclusion: Nile's decision is correct.
The first BF is not a belief. It is a fact explaining why e-com is not doing well currently. Hence, (A) and (B) are out.
The second can be called an intermediate conclusion (of the analysts). The main conclusion is then derived from this intermediate conclusion. Or the second BF can be better called a prediction or a belief.
C) The first is an observation that is not disputed by the argument; the second is a conclusion that supports the main conclusion of the argument.
The first BF is an observation and the argument doesn't dispute it. The argument talks about the future. It doesn't dispute the current position. The second could be considered a conclusion on which the main conclusion is based. But I would rather call it a prediction or a belief.
D) The first is evidence used to support the position that the argument does not oppose; the second is a belief that supports the position that the argument seeks to establish.
The first BF is evidence but it is not supporting any position. A position is an opinion. 'Currently e-com is not profitable' is not a position.
There is only one position given and that is of the author that Nile is right.
The second BF is a belief that supports the position that the argument seeks to establish.
E) The first is the explanation for a belief that the author agrees with; the second is a prediction in favor of the main conclusion of the argument.
The first BF is the explanation but not for a belief. It is the explanation for an observation, for a fact.
Frankly, I am a little torn between (C) and (D). I don't like either.