Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 11:20 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 11:20

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92902
Own Kudos [?]: 618786 [2]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Jul 2017
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [3]
Given Kudos: 106
Send PM
Current Student
Joined: 25 Apr 2020
Posts: 59
Own Kudos [?]: 76 [1]
Given Kudos: 138
Location: India
GMAT 1: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q167 V163
GPA: 3
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2018
Posts: 124
Own Kudos [?]: 100 [2]
Given Kudos: 36
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.98
Send PM
Re: An anthropologist hypothesized that a certain medicinal power containe [#permalink]
2
Kudos
IMO E

An anthropologist hypothesized that a certain medicinal power contained a significant amount of the deadly toxin T. When the test she performed for the presence of toxin T was negative, the anthropologist did not report the results. A chemist who nevertheless learned about the test results charged the anthropologist with fraud. The anthropologist, however, countered that those results were invalid because the power had inadvertently been test in acidic solution.

In the absence of the anthropologist’s reply, which one of the following principles, if established, would most support the chemist’s charge?


(A) Reporting results for an experiment that was not conducted and reporting a false result for an actual experiment are both instances of scientific fraud. : The scientist didn't report the results, so both of these instances are out

(B) Scientists can commit fraud and yet report some disconfirmations of their hypothesis. This is a general statement and doesn't apply here

(C) Scientists can neglect to report some disconfirmations of their hypotheses and yet be innocent of fraud. This is the opposite. It weakens Chemist's charge

(D) Scientists commit fraud whenever they report as valid any test result they know to be invalid. She did not not report invalid results, but didn't report valid results.

(E) Scientists who neglect to report any experiment that could be interpreted as disconfirming their hypothesis have thereby committed fraud. Correct
Current Student
Joined: 09 Jan 2020
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [2]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.4
Send PM
Re: An anthropologist hypothesized that a certain medicinal power containe [#permalink]
2
Kudos
I read the question first, which was a little confusing. But as I read the prompt I understood it better.

I actually paused before reading the anthropologist's counter to think about what would "support the chemist's charge"

Here's what we know:
-The anthropologist had a hypothesis
-He/She conducted an experiment
-The results may have disproved the hypothesis
-The anthropologist didn't report the results
-The chemist charged the anthropologist with fraud

I thought: In order to support the chemist's charge, fraud must occur when scientists don't report the results of an experiment. Possibly moreso when the results contradict the hypothesis.

Answer Choice (E) states just this. So that is my answer
GMAT Club Bot
Re: An anthropologist hypothesized that a certain medicinal power containe [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6919 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne