QUESTION TYPE: Parallel Reasoning (find same flaw)
ORIGINAL ARGUMENT:Audit found no tax avoidance in accounts → No tax avoidance exists
THE FLAW:Didn't find X in a
LIMITED source → X doesn't exist
(Accounts may not capture hidden tax avoidance!)
ANSWER ANALYSIS:(A) Plan unmodified so far → Won't be modified in future
→
Different flaw: Past → Future prediction ✗
(B) Overall budget exceeded → At least one project exceeded
→
Different flaw: Whole → Part reasoning ✗
(C) Best essays have no current events → Students are apathetic
→
SAME flaw: Didn't find X in filtered source → X doesn't exist ✓
(D) All schools need repair → Education is substandard
→
Different flaw: Building condition → Education quality leap ✗
(E) Index has no critic listing → Book doesn't mention critic
→
Weak match: Index is MEANT to be comprehensive ✗
WHY C OVER E:• "Best essays" =
FILTERED source (like accounts)
• "Index" =
COMPREHENSIVE source (meant to list everything)
C's source is limited just like the original - students may care about current events but didn't write
good enough essays.
E's conclusion is actually reasonable since indexes list everything.
Answer: C