Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 20:45 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 20:45
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
kidderek
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Last visit: 13 Jul 2019
Posts: 1,960
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,960
Kudos: 364
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KingKREEP
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 21 Mar 2007
Last visit: 07 Oct 2011
Posts: 570
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
WE 1: Hi-tech Product Development
Posts: 570
Kudos: 73
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
walker
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Last visit: 25 May 2025
Posts: 2,398
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 362
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Posts: 2,398
Kudos: 10,717
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
riverripper
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Last visit: 20 Aug 2022
Posts: 4,306
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: Back in Chicago, IL
Concentration: General/Operations Management
Schools:Kellogg Alum: Class of 2010
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Posts: 4,306
Kudos: 806
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
walker
Copyrights. I would like to ask some intelligent people at this site: when a person posts question from bought OG, because he or she want to understand this question deeply, does he or she violate copyrights? I think he or she does... and why is GMAC so reluctant to fight with this situation? I guess the situation does not threaten profit and reputation of GMAC and, to some extent, even increase profit, because people learn more and retake exam. And do not forget about effect/costs ratio....

I too was curious about that...I would hate for this place and some of the other upstanding sites like beatthegmat to get bagged. The only reason people post OG questions is either they got them from someplace like the 1000 series and didnt realize they were OG questions or the solution in the book didnt make enough sense to them. I dont think anyone on here would actually study materials found only on here and expect to do well. Personally, I think as soon as you decide to take the GMAT the OG is something you MUST own.
User avatar
kidderek
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Last visit: 13 Jul 2019
Posts: 1,960
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,960
Kudos: 364
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My understanding is this: There exists no law that protects a company's rules that the company has created. For example, there's no law that says that you can't cheat on a test. Therefore, GMAC is using copyright as a means (written law) to an end (prosecution of scoretop).

Now, people have already begun to confuse the two. Some on this thread have equated using "live" questions with using copyrighted questions, such as OG or PR or Kraplan. The two are not only vastly different, but also the difference in the level of culpability is great.

It's one thing to ask someone to explain a problem on a retired question, and another thing to use a "live" question that someone who recently took the gmat posts on a paid forum. It's worlds apart.

Just because GMAC is seeking relief via copyright, doesn't make all copyrighted material equal.
User avatar
riverripper
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Last visit: 20 Aug 2022
Posts: 4,306
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: Back in Chicago, IL
Concentration: General/Operations Management
Schools:Kellogg Alum: Class of 2010
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Posts: 4,306
Kudos: 806
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
So it seems like this has a lot of steam on BW now...I was contacted to give my opinions on it for another article. They are also recruiting two people, one on each side, to debate the subject. I actually sent a PM to Rhyme about that since I think he probably did the most research and definitely has a great side to argue.

One good thing about this scandal is the fact that it doesnt seem like it will be blown over. I think the more that is out there about this the less likely it is that schools and GMAC can let it go without some significant response. If GMAC cancels a bunch of scores then its on schools to take actions. I would say that there are going to be people affected at almost every top school.
User avatar
kidderek
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Last visit: 13 Jul 2019
Posts: 1,960
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,960
Kudos: 364
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I really don't understand the debate here. I guess the issue is the "intent" on the part of the people who signed up. But there are blogs out there that clearly state they new what JJs were.

The cheaters are starting to believe their own BS that they were witless nitwits who chanced upon a random website that they threw money at and are innocent victims in this entire sham.
User avatar
walker
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Last visit: 25 May 2025
Posts: 2,398
Own Kudos:
10,717
 [1]
Given Kudos: 362
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Posts: 2,398
Kudos: 10,717
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
riverripper
I dont think anyone on here would actually study materials found only on here and expect to do well. Personally, I think as soon as you decide to take the GMAT the OG is something you MUST own.

I absolutely agree, OG should be inevitable part of every test-takers! But, let's return to copyrights: first page of OG - "No part of this book shall be reproduced.....".

I can go further, let's say I'm CEO Nokia and faces with the threat form Apple iPhone due to its touch-screen technology, that is patented. What should I do? Avoid copyrights lawsuits and lead company to a huge loses? Or encourage all my employees to 'invent' analog of touch-screen technology with low as possible but non-zero risks of copyrights lawsuits? It is critical reasoning from CEO table :-D
User avatar
kidderek
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Last visit: 13 Jul 2019
Posts: 1,960
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,960
Kudos: 364
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
walker

I absolutely agree, OG should be inevitable part of every test-takers! But, let's return to copyrights: first page of OG - "No part of this book shall be reproduced.....".

If the GMAC decides to shut us down, they're even more stupid than I had originally thought. No forum advocates the usage + purchase of the OG more than the people here. NONE.
User avatar
walker
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Last visit: 25 May 2025
Posts: 2,398
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 362
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Posts: 2,398
Kudos: 10,717
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kidderek
If the GMAC decides to shut us down, they're even more stupid than I had originally thought. No forum advocates the usage + purchase of the OG more than the people here. NONE.

Yeah, they are smart people and they prefer profit rather than satisfaction in protection of copyrights.
User avatar
jasonc
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Last visit: 09 Sep 2011
Posts: 199
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 199
Kudos: 79
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
walker
kidderek
If the GMAC decides to shut us down, they're even more stupid than I had originally thought. No forum advocates the usage + purchase of the OG more than the people here. NONE.

Yeah, they are smart people and they prefer profit rather than satisfaction in protection of copyrights.

well the whole point of copyrights is to protect profits (integrity of the test is vital to long term profit).
It wouldn't make much sense for them to go after legit sites like this for copyright reasons because that defeats the purpose of having the copyrights.
(I'm assuming profit gained from OG sales increases from usage of this site > profit lost from people using materials on this site instead of buying OG. A pretty reasonable assumption imo)


Sites like this are providing free customer service for the OG/GMAC through more thorough explanations of the answers.
User avatar
hbs.aspirant
Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Last visit: 01 Jul 2008
Posts: 133
Own Kudos:
Posts: 133
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
found this on GMAT website :

Inappropriate Uses of
GMAT® Scores
1. AS A REQUIREMENT FOR AWARDING A
DEGREE.
The GMAT® test is designed for selection for
graduate management study, financial aid awards,
or counseling and guidance. Any other purpose
should be avoided.

2. AS A REQUIREMENT FOR EMPLOYMENT,
LICENSING OR CERTIFICATION TO PERFORM
A JOB, OR FOR JOB-RELATED REWARDS
(RAISES, PROMOTIONS, ETC.).
The use of the GMAT® scores for these purposes is
inappropriate. Further, programs using the GMAT®
exam may not supply score reports for any of these
purposes.

From a leading GMAT preparation company:

"a teacher must score at the 99th percentile (currently a 760+ overall) on an Official GMAT exam in order to be considered for our staff. "

This is on the website and no action is being taken. Is this because this company is corporate partner to some blue chip companies and charges a lot of money for providing training by instructors who appeared for real GMAT?
User avatar
trader1
Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Last visit: 04 Jul 2012
Posts: 385
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: Europe
Concentration: General Management
Schools:St. Gallen '09
Posts: 385
Kudos: 62
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
After reading endless posts here and there about this whole affair, I am quite disturbed by a lot of people are so quick to rush to judgment regarding those who have used Scoretop.

In 100% honesty, can anyone here truly say what actually was happening at the Scoretop site over the course of the last 5+ years? Yes, we have seen SOME examples of questionable activity occur (based on the court documents), but that doesn't mean much of anything regarding everyone else associated in some way with Scoretop. Calling someone else a cheater is a serious accusation. In this situation, everyone's case needs to be examined individually. There should be no rush to judgment.
User avatar
kryzak
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Last visit: 10 Aug 2013
Posts: 5,452
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Status:Um... what do you want to know?
Location: SF, CA, USA
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship, Digital Media & Entertainment
Schools:UC Berkeley Haas School of Business MBA 2010
GPA: 3.9 - undergrad 3.6 - grad-EE
WE 1: Social Gaming
Posts: 5,452
Kudos: 744
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
woot, river and rhyme are going to be famous now on BW. :)

I read through the entire BW posts, I'm just a bit disgusted by some of the defense people put up. I hope this doesn't blow over and the right amount of punishment gets dealt out (without turning into a witch hunt)
User avatar
rhyme
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Last visit: 02 Dec 2024
Posts: 5,909
Own Kudos:
3,172
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE:Business Development (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
Posts: 5,909
Kudos: 3,172
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kryzak
woot, river and rhyme are going to be famous now on BW. :)

Cant say I really want the attention. People's opinions are heated on the subject and I don't really see any outcome other than me pissing off people by writing something official for BW. I'll leave them to their own devices. If they want to offer me a lead investigative journalist job they know where to find me. :)
User avatar
BSchoolorBust
Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Last visit: 28 Jan 2010
Posts: 78
Own Kudos:
Posts: 78
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Wow - I gotta say I'm surprised by how prevalent cheating is ... I would have thought GMAC would have anticipated these events and put measures in place to prevent them.

For my own selfish purposes I would like GMAC to cancel the scores of everyone who used Scoretop (less competition for the rest of us!) but to be fair, I think there are a lot of honest guys out there who signed up unwittingly not knowing that there were "live" questions on the site. That said, I'm sure there are a lot of disingeneous ones too, but it's going to be tricky separating the two, and I do feel for the honest ones if their scores were cancelled.
User avatar
BSchoolorBust
Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Last visit: 28 Jan 2010
Posts: 78
Own Kudos:
Posts: 78
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Actually I just read from the BW article that Scoretop advertises having "live" questions. If this is indeed the case, then those guys should be accountable. Even if there was a 0.00000001% chance that they would get the same identical question on the GMAT, it's cheating.
User avatar
walker
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Last visit: 25 May 2025
Posts: 2,398
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 362
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Posts: 2,398
Kudos: 10,717
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I've just thought that those people hit us twice. They unfairly increased their scores and eventually decreased our score, because in such situation GMAC rates a problem more easier than it is. For example, 700-level problem shifted to 650-level and we lost our points! I guess all cheaters reach 90% (20'000) and could essentially distort (6'000 of 20'000) GMAT scale at high level scores. :devil
User avatar
kidderek
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Last visit: 13 Jul 2019
Posts: 1,960
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,960
Kudos: 364
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BSchoolorBust

For my own selfish purposes I would like GMAC to cancel the scores of everyone who used Scoretop (less competition for the rest of us!)
There is absolutely nothing selfish about what you want.

walker
I've just thought that those people hit us twice. They unfairly increased their scores and eventually decreased our score, because in such situation GMAC rates a problem more easier than it is. For example, 700-level problem shifted to 650-level and we lost our points! I guess all cheaters reach 90% (20'000) and could essentially distort (6'000 of 20'000) GMAT scale at high level scores. :devil
Well the stat is more in the 200,000 - 250,000. But with that said, I'm telling you this 6,000 domestic figure is just the tip of the iceberg.
User avatar
kevincan
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Last visit: 18 Apr 2022
Posts: 958
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: Madrid
Posts: 958
Kudos: 729
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kidderek
BSchoolorBust

For my own selfish purposes I would like GMAC to cancel the scores of everyone who used Scoretop (less competition for the rest of us!)
There is absolutely nothing selfish about what you want.

walker
I've just thought that those people hit us twice. They unfairly increased their scores and eventually decreased our score, because in such situation GMAC rates a problem more easier than it is. For example, 700-level problem shifted to 650-level and we lost our points! I guess all cheaters reach 90% (20'000) and could essentially distort (6'000 of 20'000) GMAT scale at high level scores. :devil
Well the stat is more in the 200,000 - 250,000. But with that said, I'm telling you this 6,000 domestic figure is just the tip of the iceberg.

I think Walker is referring to high scorers (GMAT 700+).
Keep in mind that these 6000 people were over 4 years and that not all VIP members cheated.
   1  ...  11   12   13   14   15  ...  22