Of the following claims, which one can most justifiably be rejected on the basis of the statement above?
(A) Crows will abandon their roost site only in response to an increase in the population of the flock.
Makes sense. A possible reason why they move.
(B) When there is a shortage of food in the area in which a flock of crows normally hunts and scavenges, some members of the flock will begin to hunt and scavenge outside that area.
It says 60-80 km - It's not a fixed boundary.
(C) Most of the hunting and scavenging that crows do occurs more than eight kilometres (five miles) from their roost.
Odd but possible!
(D) Once a flock of crows has settled on a new roost site, it is extremely difficult to force it to abandon that site for another.
It says that they move after several years.
(E) When a flock of crows moves to a new roost site, it generally does so because the area in which it has hunted and scavenged has been depleted of food sources.
They are moving within 8 KMs. The area of hunting is a 100KM radius. Doesn't make sense!?!?!?!
Correct Answer - E