Last visit was: 17 Jun 2025, 22:53 It is currently 17 Jun 2025, 22:54
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 771
Own Kudos:
410
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 771
Kudos: 410
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Parikshit07
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 15 Jul 2019
Last visit: 05 Mar 2022
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 335
Location: India
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V23
GMAT 2: 600 Q49 V22
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V37 (Online)
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V37 (Online)
Posts: 17
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,337
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
warrior1991
Joined: 03 Mar 2017
Last visit: 03 Feb 2022
Posts: 573
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 596
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
Products:
Posts: 573
Kudos: 431
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
At the time of the Mexican agrarian revolution, the most radical faction, that of Zapata and his followers, proposed a return to communal ownership of land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards.
(A) land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards
(B) land, a form of ownership of the pre-Columbians and respected by the Spaniards
(C) land, respected by the Spaniards and a pre-Columbian form of ownership
(D) land in which a pre-Columbian form of ownership was respected by the Spaniards
(E) land that had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards

AndrewN VeritasKarishma

Totally stumped after seeing the answer choice. I marked B as answer.

My thoughts on option B:-land, a form of ownership of the pre-Columbians and respected by the Spaniards
a form of ownership.............. is a noun+noun phrase construct that is giving me extra information on communal ownership.

But about A, I rejected A on the basis of the awkward 'to' just after comma.

Please help !!
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 17 Jun 2025
Posts: 16,051
Own Kudos:
73,746
 [5]
Given Kudos: 472
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,051
Kudos: 73,746
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
warrior1991
Quote:
At the time of the Mexican agrarian revolution, the most radical faction, that of Zapata and his followers, proposed a return to communal ownership of land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards.
(A) land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards
(B) land, a form of ownership of the pre-Columbians and respected by the Spaniards
(C) land, respected by the Spaniards and a pre-Columbian form of ownership
(D) land in which a pre-Columbian form of ownership was respected by the Spaniards
(E) land that had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards

AndrewN VeritasKarishma

Totally stumped after seeing the answer choice. I marked B as answer.

My thoughts on option B:-land, a form of ownership of the pre-Columbians and respected by the Spaniards
a form of ownership.............. is a noun+noun phrase construct that is giving me extra information on communal ownership.

But about A, I rejected A on the basis of the awkward 'to' just after comma.

Please help !!

It is a bad question. I don't think it is an official question even though it has been tagged as such. If someone has a screenshot of this question from some official resource, please share.

My problem starts with the use of "had been" for "a pre-Columbian form of ownership".
"a pre-Columbian form of ownership" means "this form of ownership was popular in pre-Columbian era".

So "communal ownership of land" is still a "pre-Columbian form of ownership".
I don't have to say that "communal ownership of land" HAD BEEN a "pre-Columbian form of ownership".

If I am talking from the perspective of a point in the past (at the time of Mexican revolution), then I can say, "it was a pre-Columbian form of ownership".
I can use past perfect for state only if the state got over at the point in the simple past.

(B) has a big problem "a form of ownership of the pre-Columbians".
The ownership was of land, not of pre-Columbians.

In (C), the appositive needs to be right next to what it is renaming and then we can have a modifier without "and".
For example,
... communal ownership of land, a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards ...
would be fine.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,336
 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,336
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
warrior1991
Quote:
At the time of the Mexican agrarian revolution, the most radical faction, that of Zapata and his followers, proposed a return to communal ownership of land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards.
(A) land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards
(B) land, a form of ownership of the pre-Columbians and respected by the Spaniards
(C) land, respected by the Spaniards and a pre-Columbian form of ownership
(D) land in which a pre-Columbian form of ownership was respected by the Spaniards
(E) land that had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards

AndrewN VeritasKarishma

Totally stumped after seeing the answer choice. I marked B as answer.

My thoughts on option B:-land, a form of ownership of the pre-Columbians and respected by the Spaniards
a form of ownership.............. is a noun+noun phrase construct that is giving me extra information on communal ownership.

But about A, I rejected A on the basis of the awkward 'to' just after comma.

Please help !!
Hello, warrior1991. If both VeritasKarishma and GMATNinja (in an earlier post) recommend looking elsewhere for high-quality questions, then who am I to disagree? I would merely like to add that your reservation about an infinitive after a comma, an infinitive phrase in parallel with an earlier usage, is understandable, but the grammatical construct is perfectly acceptable. We are accustomed to seeing a conjunction—and, most commonly—between parallel elements, but there is no problem with a sentence taking a slightly different grammatical path. Take the following sentence, for instance:

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., urged his followers to demonstrate peacefully, to host sit-ins as a form of nonviolent protest against any perceived injustices.

The infinitive phrases answer the question, What did Dr. King urge [his followers to do]? The part about sit-ins can act as an extension or definition of the first phrase. Neither are phrases unique in their ability to stack in such a manner. It is not uncommon to see such usage with clauses either: He said that he disliked blue, that he liked red instead (answering the question, What did he say?).

Although these nuances of grammar may not pop up on SC questions, you never know when GMAC™ may decide to test a concept in a less familiar way. In the end, you have to be open to learning something you may not have thought possible, at least when it comes to grammar.

- Andrew
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,336
 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,336
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Himanshuv0
Hello AndrewN

I understand the intended meaning now and the structure too.

But I am not able to differentiate its meaning from the meaning of Option E.

…… a return to [X], to [Y]

Here Y describing X

In option E, “that”is also describing X as well.

Please clarify

Posted from my mobile device
Hello, Himanshuv0. I think we are giving this question too much airtime, to be honest. I will say that (E) is confusing in its presentation. I am not saying that that absolutely cannot modify a noun that falls before the nearest preceding noun, but it can be jarring to see land that had been... when the information that follows is not about the land. That is, the relative clause construct allows us to anticipate certain information, and when the sentence switches back, we can find that experience unsatisfying. The parallel to phrases more effectively convey the meaning of this particular sentence (i.e. without the reader having to backtrack to make sense of everything). If I had to choose between two otherwise equal sentences, one of which flowed unidirectionally and the other back and forth, I would choose the former every time as the one that was easier to follow.

Thank you for following up. Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
User avatar
VIGHNESHKAMATH
Joined: 28 Sep 2021
Last visit: 21 Nov 2022
Posts: 151
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 259
Posts: 151
Kudos: 52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello

Can anyone tell me how the phrase within the punctuations works " ,proposed a return to communal ownership of land, "

I thought that anything between two commas is non essential , thus I ruled out options A, B & C basis this logic and arrived at E (as in E 'that' can modify the preposition phrase ''communal ownership of land'

Please assist.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,336
 [3]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,336
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VIGHNESHKAMATH
Hello

Can anyone tell me how the phrase within the punctuations works " ,proposed a return to communal ownership of land, "

I thought that anything between two commas is non essential , thus I ruled out options A, B & C basis this logic and arrived at E (as in E 'that' can modify the preposition phrase ''communal ownership of land'

Please assist.
Hello, VIGHNESHKAMATH. You seem to have the right idea here but the wrong application. If you ask yourself what forms the main clause—subject and predicate—you will find that within the original sentence, it is actually that of Zapata and his followers that is non-essential, interrupting the main clause the most radical faction proposed a return to communal ownership of land. The sentence opens with a phrase, followed by the main clause, a phrase interrupter, and an alternative continuation of a return at the end.

Quote:
At the time of the Mexican agrarian revolution, the most radical faction, that of Zapata and his followers, proposed a return to communal ownership of land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards.
Although the integrity of the question has been placed under doubt by several Experts above, the fundamental skill of subject-verb identification can prove useful for any SC question, legitimate or otherwise.

Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
User avatar
rikinmathur
Joined: 14 Sep 2019
Last visit: 31 May 2024
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 50
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I came across this question and was stumped between A and C. I went with C purely because A had the weird structure: a return to x, to y - I thought this was wrong and because C was grammatically correct, I thought it didn’t change the meaning drastically and went with it. Can someone explain why the structure in this sentence is ok ?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 17 Jun 2025
Posts: 7,331
Own Kudos:
68,263
 [3]
Given Kudos: 1,947
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,331
Kudos: 68,263
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rikinmathur
I came across this question and was stumped between A and C. I went with C purely because A had the weird structure: a return to x, to y - I thought this was wrong and because C was grammatically correct, I thought it didn’t change the meaning drastically and went with it. Can someone explain why the structure in this sentence is ok ?
Here's a simplified version of (A):

    "The most radical faction proposed a return to [X], to [Y]."

The repetition of the "to" lets the reader know that [X] and [Y] are referring to the same thing: "communal ownership of land" is "what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards."

Here's another example that uses a similar modifier:

    "Tim dreamed of a better future, of a world in which smart phones have four different camera lenses, not just three."

The repetition of the "of" indicates that the parts in bold refer to the same thing -- the thing that Tim dreamed of. (<-- Look, Ma, another example!)

Modifiers like these aren't that unusual on the GMAT. Here are a few others:


They might seem awkward, but the repeated words actually improve the clarity of these sentences because they force you to read and interpret the sentences in a very specific way. In other words, those repeated words help create sentences that are NOT open to interpretation, and that's generally a good thing on the GMAT.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
louisinau
Joined: 15 Aug 2020
Last visit: 16 Dec 2022
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 30
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Could anyone please help me understand the function of ''that'' in ''the most radical faction, that of Zapata and his followers''
Does this ''that'' function the same with the ''that'' in comparison sentences and refer to faction? if so, why it is not ''the most radical faction of Zapata and his followers''?
Why bother writing in this way?
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 17 Jun 2025
Posts: 5,131
Own Kudos:
4,724
 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,131
Kudos: 4,724
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
louisinau
Could anyone please help me understand the function of ''that'' in ''the most radical faction, that of Zapata and his followers''
Does this ''that'' function the same with the ''that'' in comparison sentences and refer to faction? if so, why it is not ''the most radical faction of Zapata and his followers''?
Why bother writing in this way?

Hello louisinau,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, here "that" refers to the noun "the faction"; the pronoun phrase "that of Zapata and his followers'' is an appositive that modifies "the most radical faction" to convey that the most radical faction was the faction of Zapata and his followers.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
GMATking94
Joined: 16 Jan 2022
Last visit: 18 Apr 2025
Posts: 180
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 125
Status:Do or Die
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GPA: 4
WE:Operations (Energy)
Products:
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
Posts: 180
Kudos: 73
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vishalsuri
At the time of the Mexican agrarian revolution, the most radical faction, that of Zapata and his followers, proposed a return to communal ownership of land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards.


(A) land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards

(B) land, a form of ownership of the pre-Columbians and respected by the Spaniards

(C) land, respected by the Spaniards and a pre-Columbian form of ownership

(D) land in which a pre-Columbian form of ownership was respected by the Spaniards

(E) land that had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards

Hi Experts GMATNinja KarishmaB egmat GMATGuruNY

I wanted to know if the "touch" rule as it is said is said, only refers to "land" in case of (E) and not the whole thing "communal ownership of land" ??

Please let me know your thoughts. As per me, it clearly conveys the meaning.

Thanks!
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 05 Jun 2025
Posts: 1,345
Own Kudos:
3,631
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,345
Kudos: 3,631
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATking94
I wanted to know if the "touch" rule as it is said is said, only refers to "land" in case of (E) and not the whole thing "communal ownership of land" ??

Please let me know your thoughts. As per me, it clearly conveys the meaning.

Thanks!

a return to prosperity
a return to peace
a return to communal ownership


The terms in blue all refer to GENERAL CONCEPTS.
It is extremely rare for this type of term to be modified by a that-modifier.
The reason:
Whereas each of these terms refers to something GENERAL, a that-modifier typically refers to something SPECIFIC.

E: a return to communal ownership of land that had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership
Here -- since the term in blue is typically not modified by a that-modifier -- the portion in red seems to refer to land, conveying that the LAND had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership.
The result is a nonsensical meaning.

SC106 in the OG12:
Marconi conceived of the radio as a tool for private conversation that could substitute for the telephone.
Here, the term in blue refers to a general concept and thus is not typically modified by a that-modifier.
As a result, it is crystal clear that the green portion refers not to private conversation but to a tool, conveying the following meaning:
a tool that could substitute for the telephone
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 17 Jun 2025
Posts: 16,051
Own Kudos:
73,746
 [1]
Given Kudos: 472
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,051
Kudos: 73,746
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATking94
vishalsuri
At the time of the Mexican agrarian revolution, the most radical faction, that of Zapata and his followers, proposed a return to communal ownership of land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards.


(A) land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards

(B) land, a form of ownership of the pre-Columbians and respected by the Spaniards

(C) land, respected by the Spaniards and a pre-Columbian form of ownership

(D) land in which a pre-Columbian form of ownership was respected by the Spaniards

(E) land that had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards

Hi Experts GMATNinja KarishmaB egmat GMATGuruNY

I wanted to know if the "touch" rule as it is said is said, only refers to "land" in case of (E) and not the whole thing "communal ownership of land" ??

Please let me know your thoughts. As per me, it clearly conveys the meaning.

Thanks!

"Touch" rule is not sacrosanct but the problem in (E) is the role that a "that clause" plays. Normally, a 'that clause' defines and restricts. It restricts our referent to someone/something specific.

The toy train that the child broke yesterday needs to be thrown away.
'that the child broke yesterday' tells us which toy train.

The book on Callisthenics that Mary wrote is phenomenal.

There are many books on Callisthenics. 'that Mary wrote' defines to which book we are referring - the one that Mary wrote.

If we want to rename 'communal ownership of land,' instead of a 'that clause,' we could use an appositive.
Another problem I have here is with "had been" which I have discussed here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/at-the-time- ... l#p2837046
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 17 Jun 2025
Posts: 7,331
Own Kudos:
68,263
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,947
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,331
Kudos: 68,263
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATking94
vishalsuri
At the time of the Mexican agrarian revolution, the most radical faction, that of Zapata and his followers, proposed a return to communal ownership of land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards.

(A) land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards

(B) land, a form of ownership of the pre-Columbians and respected by the Spaniards

(C) land, respected by the Spaniards and a pre-Columbian form of ownership

(D) land in which a pre-Columbian form of ownership was respected by the Spaniards

(E) land that had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards

Hi Experts [url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=GMATNinja%5D%5Bb%5DGMATNinja%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D [url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=KarishmaB%5D%5Bb%5DKarishmaB%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D [url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=egmat%5D%5Bb%5Degmat%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D [url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=GMATGuruNY%5D%5Bb%5DGMATGuruNY%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D

I wanted to know if the "touch" rule as it is said is said, only refers to "land" in case of (E) and not the whole thing "communal ownership of land" ??

Please let me know your thoughts. As per me, it clearly conveys the meaning.

Thanks!
Public service announcement: there is no "touch" rule! If "that" is used as a modifier, we need to ask ourselves two questions:

    1. Is there a noun or noun phrase the "that" can logically refer to?

    2. Is this this noun or noun phrase reasonably close?

That's it.

The problem with (E) is that there's no noun "that" can logically describe. When we use "that" as a modifier we're differentiating a noun from a larger group. If Tim hates the dogs that are barking, there are, presumably, other dogs that aren't barking, and only the noisy ones are bothering him.

Now go back to (E). Are we talking about "land" that had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership, as opposed to other types of land? Well, land isn't itself a type of ownership, so that can't be it.

So are we talking about "communal ownership" that had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership, as opposed to other types of communal ownership? That doesn't make much sense. "Communal ownership" just means that the community as a whole owns the land. How many ways could there possibly be to do that?

It makes far more sense to elaborate on the idea of "communal ownership" by pointing out that this was the form of ownership used in pre-Columbian times. This is the meaning we get in (A).

Put another way, (A) is right because it's clearer and more logical, no matter how we interpret (E) -- not because of any "touch" rule.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
muthalgang
Joined: 24 Apr 2023
Last visit: 11 Oct 2023
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Schools: Stern '13
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V27
GPA: 3.87
Schools: Stern '13
GMAT 1: 640 Q50 V27
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In option E, I believe "that" can modifiy communal ownership of land.
So how is option E wrong? Please share your insight
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 17 Jun 2025
Posts: 7,331
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,947
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,331
Kudos: 68,263
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
muthalgang
In option E, I believe "that" can modifiy communal ownership of land.

So how is option E wrong? Please share your insight
First of all, remember that GMAT SC is about picking the BEST choice out of the 5 available options, not about labelling each individual choice as right or wrong.

In (A), the repetition of the pronoun ("to communal ownership of land, to what had been...") makes it very clear that the "what had been" part describes "communal ownership of land" and not just "land".

In (E), can "that" technically modify "communal ownership of land"? Sure. But at first glance, it seems to modify "land" alone. Does that make (E) absolutely WRONG? Maybe not, but the structure in (A) makes the meaning clearer, and that makes (A) a better sentence.

Also, you could argue that the meaning is a bit off in (E). (E) suggests that the radical faction didn't want to return to just any old "communal ownership of land" -- instead, they wanted to return to the specific communal ownership of land that had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards.

But that isn't quite what we want in this context. The faction wanted to return to communal ownership of land, which, by the way, is something that had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards. That's a subtle distinction, but it's another small vote in favor of (A) over (E).

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Raman109
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 16 Jun 2025
Posts: 812
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Products:
Posts: 812
Kudos: 138
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
At the time of the Mexican agrarian revolution, the most radical faction, that of Zapata and his followers, proposed a return to communal ownership of land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards.


(A) land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards - The core sentence structure is "the most radical faction proposed a return to communal ownership of land" or "the most radical faction proposed a return to what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards."

"to" is mandated by "return." "what had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards" is a noun clause that defines "communal ownership."

Sequence of events
1. a pre-Columbian form of ownership
2. Spaniards respected it
3. radical faction proposed (recent)

So "had been" is used to showcase that the "pre-Columbian form of ownership" existed before "Spaniards respected it" - ok.

(B) land, a form of ownership of the pre-Columbians and respected by the Spaniards - no.

(C) land, respected by the Spaniards and a pre-Columbian form of ownership - no.

(D) land in which a pre-Columbian form of ownership was respected by the Spaniards - it seems proposal and respect by Spaniards is happening at the same time.

(E) land that had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards - "that" here refers to "land" which is wrong.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7331 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts