This is the reason I am going back to the
OG, its the best book ever written. I am not gonna focus on any other source. First the argument is a copy of the one in the
OG. Second OA is E.
This is such a subtle question. There are TWO parts of the conclusion. The question wants to strengthen just the first part (increased product sales) Not the second (how the manufacturer's profitability is impacted) part.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports an
argument for the incentive programs? -----> means tick on the answer which strengthens the "incentive program" of the MANUFACTURER. (in favor of the manufacturer)
D is NOT in favor of the manufacturer. It works in favor of the dealers. Dealers cut the profitability. It strengthens the second part of the conclusion.
E says there is a risk by not offering the promotion. E works in favor of the manufacturer - increased sales - increased profits.
E. If a manufacturer fails to offer such promotion but its competitor offers them,
that competitor will tend to attract consumers away from the manufacturer's
product.