Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 07:18 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 07:18
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2   3 
avatar
Naveengkp022
avatar
Joined: 19 Oct 2021
Last visit: 06 Dec 2022
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 4
Kudos: 1
 [1]
Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel 02 Jun 2022, 22:15
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
Quote:
Experts, could you please explain the official solution a lil more as to why exactly is B incorrect? I was stuck b/w B and D. I just couldn't point to an error in B. 'resulting' is actually modifying the previous whole clause right? Is the 'as much .. as in 1960' not correct in B? Please help. Thanks :)
Good question! The phrase "resulting in," because it contains a preposition, should introduce a noun or noun phrase that is a result. For example,

    "Tim fed undercooked burritos to the neighbor's children, resulting in mass indigestion." --> What was the result of Tim's culinary negligence? Mass indigestion. Makes sense.

Now look at the relevant portion in (B):

    "Ten million acres of forest have been lost there since 1960, resulting in wood..."

The result of 10 million acres of forest disappearing was...wood? No. That's illogical. So (B) is out.

The phrase "as a result" will introduce a full clause. Again, poor beleaguered Tim will will help illustrate:

    "Tim fed undercooked burritos to the neighbor's children, and as a result, everyone in town hates him." --> What was the result of Tim poisoning the neighborhood kids? The clause: everyone hates him. Of course they do.

This is the same usage we see in (D):

    "Ten million acres of forest have been lost there since 1960, and as a result wood now costs eight times as much to collect and distribute as it did."

What is the result of the 10 million acres of forest disappearing? It's the entire clause: wood now costs eight times as much as it used to. Makes perfect sense. Because (D) is logical and (B) is nonsense, (D) is our winner.

I hope that helps!
Show more

Please explain- in option D, "Comma+and" construction is used which is used to introduce an independent clause.
But the clause seems dependent.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,783
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,783
Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel 08 Jun 2022, 12:23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Naveengkp022
GMATNinja
Quote:
Experts, could you please explain the official solution a lil more as to why exactly is B incorrect? I was stuck b/w B and D. I just couldn't point to an error in B. 'resulting' is actually modifying the previous whole clause right? Is the 'as much .. as in 1960' not correct in B? Please help. Thanks :)
Good question! The phrase "resulting in," because it contains a preposition, should introduce a noun or noun phrase that is a result. For example,

    "Tim fed undercooked burritos to the neighbor's children, resulting in mass indigestion." --> What was the result of Tim's culinary negligence? Mass indigestion. Makes sense.

Now look at the relevant portion in (B):

    "Ten million acres of forest have been lost there since 1960, resulting in wood..."

The result of 10 million acres of forest disappearing was...wood? No. That's illogical. So (B) is out.

The phrase "as a result" will introduce a full clause. Again, poor beleaguered Tim will will help illustrate:

    "Tim fed undercooked burritos to the neighbor's children, and as a result, everyone in town hates him." --> What was the result of Tim poisoning the neighborhood kids? The clause: everyone hates him. Of course they do.

This is the same usage we see in (D):

    "Ten million acres of forest have been lost there since 1960, and as a result wood now costs eight times as much to collect and distribute as it did."

What is the result of the 10 million acres of forest disappearing? It's the entire clause: wood now costs eight times as much as it used to. Makes perfect sense. Because (D) is logical and (B) is nonsense, (D) is our winner.

I hope that helps!

Please explain- in option D, "Comma+and" construction is used which is used to introduce an independent clause.
But the clause seems dependent.
Show more
A clause is independent if it can stand on its own grammatically. It may still need context from other sentences to really understand what's going on.

Consider an example:

    "Consequently, Tim spent the night on the couch, snuggling with a raccoon."

Meaning-wise, this sentence leaves me with many questions. But that's okay. It has a subject and a verb, and that's all you need for an independent clause.

Same deal in (D). We may need context to understand what led to the price increase, but we've got a subject ("wood") and a verb ("costs"), so we've got an independent clause.

More importantly, there is no rule that "comma + and" has to introduce an independent clause. The construction certainly can do this, but it doesn't have to.

I hope that clears things up!
User avatar
Pankaj0901
User avatar
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Last visit: 17 Dec 2022
Posts: 419
Own Kudos:
51
Given Kudos: 737
Location: India
WE:Account Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Posts: 419
Kudos: 51
Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel 17 Jun 2022, 23:46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In the correct option D, "it" refers to "wood", but shouldn't "that" be used when we are referring to the copy of something instead of the noun itself. The wood then, and now, which costs eight times more, is different. It is not the SAME wood. I request an expert to please shed some light on this.

(D) and as a result wood now costs eight times as much to collect and distribute as it did
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
 [1]
Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel 18 Jun 2022, 00:39
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pankaj0901
In the correct option D, "it" refers to "wood", but shouldn't "that" be used when we are referring to the copy of something instead of the noun itself. The wood then, and now, which costs eight times more, is different. It is not the SAME wood. I request an expert to please shed some light on this.

(D) and as a result wood now costs eight times as much to collect and distribute as it did
Show more
In this context "wood" refers to wood in general, rather than to some specific wood.

So, "it" also correctly refers to wood in general.
User avatar
Pankaj0901
User avatar
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Last visit: 17 Dec 2022
Posts: 419
Own Kudos:
51
Given Kudos: 737
Location: India
WE:Account Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Posts: 419
Kudos: 51
Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel 18 Jun 2022, 06:30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello MartyTargetTestPrep - thank you for the clarification. I understood somewhat, but not sure if I got the point completely.

In this official example, why cannot "global economy" be considered as an economy in general? There seems to be something subtle I am missing. I would highly appreciate if you could please help me understand. Thanks!


MartyTargetTestPrep
Pankaj0901
In the correct option D, "it" refers to "wood", but shouldn't "that" be used when we are referring to the copy of something instead of the noun itself. The wood then, and now, which costs eight times more, is different. It is not the SAME wood. I request an expert to please shed some light on this.

(D) and as a result wood now costs eight times as much to collect and distribute as it did
In this context "wood" refers to wood in general, rather than to some specific wood.

So, "it" also correctly refers to wood in general.
Show more
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
 [1]
Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel 18 Jun 2022, 22:57
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pankaj0901
Hello MartyTargetTestPrep - thank you for the clarification. I understood somewhat, but not sure if I got the point completely.

In this official example, why cannot "global economy" be considered as an economy in general? There seems to be something subtle I am missing. I would highly appreciate if you could please help me understand. Thanks!


MartyTargetTestPrep
Pankaj0901
In the correct option D, "it" refers to "wood", but shouldn't "that" be used when we are referring to the copy of something instead of the noun itself. The wood then, and now, which costs eight times more, is different. It is not the SAME wood. I request an expert to please shed some light on this.

(D) and as a result wood now costs eight times as much to collect and distribute as it did
In this context "wood" refers to wood in general, rather than to some specific wood.

So, "it" also correctly refers to wood in general.
Show more
Notice that "THE global economy" is a specific economy.

If a sentence said, "THE wood sold in New Zealand," then wood mentioned would be some specific wood, but "wood" in choice (D) is not some specific wood. It's just "wood."
User avatar
CRACKGMATNUT
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2020
Last visit: 26 May 2024
Posts: 150
Own Kudos:
31
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
Schools: Ivey '24 (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
Schools: Ivey '24 (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
Posts: 150
Kudos: 31
Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel 19 Aug 2022, 03:14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
Quote:
Experts, could you please explain the official solution a lil more as to why exactly is B incorrect? I was stuck b/w B and D. I just couldn't point to an error in B. 'resulting' is actually modifying the previous whole clause right? Is the 'as much .. as in 1960' not correct in B? Please help. Thanks :)
Good question! The phrase "resulting in," because it contains a preposition, should introduce a noun or noun phrase that is a result. For example,

    "Tim fed undercooked burritos to the neighbor's children, resulting in mass indigestion." --> What was the result of Tim's culinary negligence? Mass indigestion. Makes sense.

Now look at the relevant portion in (B):

    "Ten million acres of forest have been lost there since 1960, resulting in wood..."

The result of 10 million acres of forest disappearing was...wood? No. That's illogical. So (B) is out.

The phrase "as a result" will introduce a full clause. Again, poor beleaguered Tim will will help illustrate:

    "Tim fed undercooked burritos to the neighbor's children, and as a result, everyone in town hates him." --> What was the result of Tim poisoning the neighborhood kids? The clause: everyone hates him. Of course they do.

This is the same usage we see in (D):

    "Ten million acres of forest have been lost there since 1960, and as a result wood now costs eight times as much to collect and distribute as it did."

What is the result of the 10 million acres of forest disappearing? It's the entire clause: wood now costs eight times as much as it used to. Makes perfect sense. Because (D) is logical and (B) is nonsense, (D) is our winner.

I hope that helps!
Show more
GMATNinja if option D was written like this : Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel, ten million acres of forest have been lost there since 1960,and as a result wood now costs eight times as much to collect and distribute as in 1960, sentence without IT DID .. was it still a correct a option?

I am trying to link Haley's comet example with this one. Both are time to time comparison. Secondly, IT cannot pick and choose isn't it? Shouldn't IT be referring to "WOOD NOW" making the sentence WOOD NOW DID IN 1960... , making the sentence non-sensical.

Obviously I have some conceptual gap here. Can you please help?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,783
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,783
 [2]
Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel 23 Aug 2022, 14:44
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CRACKGMATNUT

GMATNinja if option D was written like this : Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel, ten million acres of forest have been lost there since 1960,and as a result wood now costs eight times as much to collect and distribute as in 1960, sentence without IT DID .. was it still a correct a option?

I am trying to link Haley's comet example with this one. Both are time to time comparison. Secondly, IT cannot pick and choose isn't it? Shouldn't IT be referring to "WOOD NOW" making the sentence WOOD NOW DID IN 1960... , making the sentence non-sensical.

Obviously I have some conceptual gap here. Can you please help?
Show more
This is what makes comparisons so tough. There's no rule that governs all scenarios, and these two examples are very different.

The Halley's comet question has the following construction: "In x... as in y." The sentence begins with a prepositional phrase, and there's a single "as" that seems to compare the prepositional phrases. Seems okay.

Now take another look at the relevant portion of (D) in this question:

Quote:
Wood now costs eight times as much to collect and distribute as it did in 1960.
Show more
Notice that here, "as" shows up twice and there's no initial prepositional phrase to compare "in 1960" to. If I can't compare prepositional phrases, it makes sense to compare what something cost in one period to what it cost (or did) in another period, so the second verb is useful. Otherwise, it's tough to tell what "in 1960" is doing.

Is there a rule to learn here? Sadly, no. You need to be able to dissect and analyze the logic of a new construction under pressure. That's what SC comparisons are testing, not your able to remember a bunch of constructions you've seen before.

So don't try to memorize examples. Instead, you'll want to practice thinking logically under pressure. And if you're ever not sure about the logic of a comparison, look for other issues.

For more on comparisons, check out this old video (and its sequel) or this shorter one.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Sahil2208
User avatar
Joined: 27 Sep 2022
Last visit: 24 Feb 2023
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
4
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 32
Kudos: 4
Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel 24 Dec 2022, 23:45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
Quote:
Experts, could you please explain the official solution a lil more as to why exactly is B incorrect? I was stuck b/w B and D. I just couldn't point to an error in B. 'resulting' is actually modifying the previous whole clause right? Is the 'as much .. as in 1960' not correct in B? Please help. Thanks :)
Good question! The phrase "resulting in," because it contains a preposition, should introduce a noun or noun phrase that is a result. For example,

    "Tim fed undercooked burritos to the neighbor's children, resulting in mass indigestion." --> What was the result of Tim's culinary negligence? Mass indigestion. Makes sense.

Now look at the relevant portion in (B):

    "Ten million acres of forest have been lost there since 1960, resulting in wood..."

The result of 10 million acres of forest disappearing was...wood? No. That's illogical. So (B) is out.

The phrase "as a result" will introduce a full clause. Again, poor beleaguered Tim will will help illustrate:

    "Tim fed undercooked burritos to the neighbor's children, and as a result, everyone in town hates him." --> What was the result of Tim poisoning the neighborhood kids? The clause: everyone hates him. Of course they do.

This is the same usage we see in (D):

    "Ten million acres of forest have been lost there since 1960, and as a result wood now costs eight times as much to collect and distribute as it did."

What is the result of the 10 million acres of forest disappearing? It's the entire clause: wood now costs eight times as much as it used to. Makes perfect sense. Because (D) is logical and (B) is nonsense, (D) is our winner.

I hope that helps!
Show more

GMATNinja

But shouldn't "as a result..." be parallel to something? Since it is being used after "and"
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,783
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,783
 [1]
Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel 13 Jan 2023, 16:18
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sahil2208
GMATNinja

But shouldn't "as a result..." be parallel to something? Since it is being used after "and"
Show more
Notice that the "and" in choice (D) actually links two independent clauses: "ten million acres of forest have been lost {...}, and wood now costs..."

You could argue that this construction is technically "parallel" since the two things joined by the "and" are both independent clauses, but that would be overthinking it. If you have a comma + conjunction that links two independent clauses, you don't really need to worry about parallelism.

But to your point, could "as a result" hypothetically affect the parallelism in a different situation? Consider this example:

    "Tim likes to eat joloff rice, butter chicken, and greasy French fries."

The word "and" is followed by a modifier ("greasy"), so is the parallelism WRONG because the first two things in the list don't have modifiers? No, the parallelism is perfectly fine here. We're just listing three nouns, and the extra little modifier doesn't affect the parallelism or the logic at all. We still have a list of three foods that Tim likes to eat -- we just have a bit more to say about the French fries. :-P

Similarly, something like "as a result" can be an extra modifier that doesn't affect the parallelism at all.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
lionx7
User avatar
Joined: 09 Apr 2023
Last visit: 18 Apr 2025
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
4
 [1]
Given Kudos: 87
Posts: 11
Kudos: 4
 [1]
Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel 12 Jul 2023, 13:24
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
Sahil2208
GMATNinja

But shouldn't "as a result..." be parallel to something? Since it is being used after "and"
Notice that the "and" in choice (D) actually links two independent clauses: "ten million acres of forest have been lost {...}, and wood now costs..."

You could argue that this construction is technically "parallel" since the two things joined by the "and" are both independent clauses, but that would be overthinking it. If you have a comma + conjunction that links two independent clauses, you don't really need to worry about parallelism.

But to your point, could "as a result" hypothetically affect the parallelism in a different situation? Consider this example:

    "Tim likes to eat joloff rice, butter chicken, and greasy French fries."

The word "and" is followed by a modifier ("greasy"), so is the parallelism WRONG because the first two things in the list don't have modifiers? No, the parallelism is perfectly fine here. We're just listing three nouns, and the extra little modifier doesn't affect the parallelism or the logic at all. We still have a list of three foods that Tim likes to eat -- we just have a bit more to say about the French fries. :-P

Similarly, something like "as a result" can be an extra modifier that doesn't affect the parallelism at all.

I hope that helps!
Show more

this is my first comment on gmatclub. I had the same question. GMATNinja you are a big help for all of us! thanks !!
User avatar
sayanghosh48
User avatar
Joined: 04 Aug 2020
Last visit: 06 Jun 2024
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
3
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
Schools: Tuck '26 Judge '25 McCombs '26 Goizueta '26 Said '27
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V36
GPA: 3.3
Schools: Tuck '26 Judge '25 McCombs '26 Goizueta '26 Said '27
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V36
Posts: 21
Kudos: 3
Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel 02 Sep 2023, 00:27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
Quote:
Experts, could you please explain the official solution a lil more as to why exactly is B incorrect? I was stuck b/w B and D. I just couldn't point to an error in B. 'resulting' is actually modifying the previous whole clause right? Is the 'as much .. as in 1960' not correct in B? Please help. Thanks :)
Good question! The phrase "resulting in," because it contains a preposition, should introduce a noun or noun phrase that is a result. For example,

    "Tim fed undercooked burritos to the neighbor's children, resulting in mass indigestion." --> What was the result of Tim's culinary negligence? Mass indigestion. Makes sense.

Now look at the relevant portion in (B):

    "Ten million acres of forest have been lost there since 1960, resulting in wood..."

The result of 10 million acres of forest disappearing was...wood? No. That's illogical. So (B) is out.

The phrase "as a result" will introduce a full clause. Again, poor beleaguered Tim will will help illustrate:

    "Tim fed undercooked burritos to the neighbor's children, and as a result, everyone in town hates him." --> What was the result of Tim poisoning the neighborhood kids? The clause: everyone hates him. Of course they do.

This is the same usage we see in (D):

    "Ten million acres of forest have been lost there since 1960, and as a result wood now costs eight times as much to collect and distribute as it did."

What is the result of the 10 million acres of forest disappearing? It's the entire clause: wood now costs eight times as much as it used to. Makes perfect sense. Because (D) is logical and (B) is nonsense, (D) is our winner.

I hope that helps!
Show more

Should a preposition always have a noun/noun phrase as it's object? Can't a preposition have a clause as its object?

E.g- I encourage you to do it.
Here the object of the preposition "to" is "do it" right? And "do it" is a clause?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,783
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,783
Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel 11 Sep 2023, 06:54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sayanghosh48
Should a preposition always have a noun/noun phrase as it's object? Can't a preposition have a clause as its object?

E.g- I encourage you to do it.
Here the object of the preposition "to" is "do it" right? And "do it" is a clause?

Posted from my mobile device
Show more
In that example, "to" is part of an infinitive verb form ("to do"), so it's not actually functioning as a preposition.

A noun clause can potentially act as the object of a preposition (e.g. "Tim is distracted by something he read on the internet."). But thinking about meaning and logic is going to be much more helpful than over-analyzing parts of speech. Does the thing after the preposition make sense as the object of the preposition? If not, then there might be a problem.

For more on that, check out this post from earlier in the thread: https://gmatclub.com/forum/because-70-p ... l#p2481520.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,832
Own Kudos:
986
Posts: 18,832
Kudos: 986
Because 70 percent of the people of India use wood as their sole fuel 26 Nov 2024, 07:37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2   3 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
188 posts