guerrero25
Brochure of an opposition political organization: “TPYD” magazine, which recently published an article revealing the weakness and inability of our government to rule the country effectively, lost its government funding within one week after publication. Clearly, the current government is doing its best to prevent criticism of its actions, even if it has to turn to the primitive means of rigid censorship.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A)Many government reforms and innovations would have increased the welfare of citizens if politically opposed forces had not put obstacles in the way.
(B) “TPYD” magazine was only one of many publications that lost government funding last year.
(C)Censorship is achieved by prohibiting publication, which is not quite the same as de-funding a publication.
(D)“TPYD” magazine is an all-time oppositional magazine that has been opposed to every government ever known to rule the country.
(E)Many political forces that lack real power try to discredit the government to enhance their own reputations.
IMO C
(A)Many government reforms and innovations would have increased the welfare of citizens if politically opposed forces had not put obstacles in the way.==>OUT OF SCOPE
(B) “TPYD” magazine was
only one of many publications that lost government funding last year.==>IMO this clearly supports the argument.
(C)Censorship is achieved by prohibiting publication, which is not quite the same as de-funding a publication.==>IMO CORRECT.
(D)“TPYD” magazine is an all-time oppositional magazine that has been opposed to every government ever known to rule the country.
Althought it is oppositional magazine but the act of defunding by government ..makes the conclusion valid.
(E)Many political forces that lack real power try to discredit the government to enhance their own reputations.
still the conclusion is still valid
hence C
WAITING OA