*h5000me writes:*
> What’s the mechanism behind, the tool evaluates and compares profiles to the schools avg?
Good question. The tool uses a combination of factors — not just GMAT vs school average. It looks at your full profile holistically: GMAT percentile at that school, GPA, undergrad institution tier, work experience quality and seniority, industry and how saturated that background is in the applicant pool, nationality and gender dynamics specific to each school, and your career achievement signal.
It then benchmarks you against what that specific school’s adcom actually looks for — not just published class stats but the unstated preferences and pool dynamics that consultants discuss privately. For example it knows that Indian male in finance is Wharton’s most overrepresented demographic and factors that into the verdict. It knows Kellogg weights peer leadership more heavily than any other M7 school and looks for evidence of that in your profile.
The output gives you a verdict bucket, your specific gaps at that school, a pool warning if your demographic is overrepresented, and one school-specific action item