I thought I remembered reading on their website/application materials that interviews typically tend to go from late September to late November, which means they actually do begin reviewing before the deadline. To be honest, though, I think that the admissions committee is very clear on what they want to reveal and what they don't. There's plenty of information on their site about how they view applications and the stats of admitted students, but there are other data points and processes that they very intentionally don't want to admit. No point in trying to figure out the black box. You could drive yourself crazy thinking "if the admissions director is on record stating that he thinks interviews only have a certain value, why do they only admit about 50-60 per cent of those interviewed?" This is all a fairly subjective process in which your hard stats (GPA/GMAT, work experience) play a large role and then subjectivity floods the margins. One thing I always enjoyed was that Stanford and Harvard seemed to have very different identities, and one of the appealing things about Stanford was that "wild card, non-factory, real community" feel to it. I get the sense that Bolton and the previous dean had a large part to play in the crafting of that community. It's probably too early to tell if it's turning into a "small, Harvard of the West" rather than a true, distinctive Stanford.