OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONgeneris
Project SC Butler: Day 151 Sentence Correction (SC1)
Cicero's influence on the Latin language was so immense that the subsequent history of prose in not only Latin
but also European languages up until the nineteenth century was said to be either a reaction against or a return to his style.
A) but also European languages up until the nineteenth century was said to be either a reaction against
B) but also European languages up until the nineteenth century
were said to be either a reaction against
C) but also European languages up until the nineteenth century was said
either to be a reaction against
D) but European languages up until the nineteenth century
were also said to be either a reaction
E) but also European languages up until the nineteenth century was said
either to be a reaction
• HIGHLIGHTSLet's strip this sentence a bit and find the subject.
Cicero's influence ... was so immense that the subsequent history of prose in not only
Latin but also
European languages . . . was said to be either a reaction against or a return to his style.
Main verb: WAS (so) INTENSE
What was so immense?
Subject: Ciceros
influenceThat-clause subject: history
That-clause verb: was said to be• Split #1: VERB TENSEHistory is singular. We need a singular verb,
was (so intense).
Correct: . . .
Options B and D incorrectly use
were.Eliminate B and D
• Split #2 - PARALLELISM in the idiom EITHER X OR YThis kind of parallelism can be really daunting.
We are working with the idiom EITHER X OR Y, in which X and Y must be parallel.
The rule for "extra words" (such as verbs or prepositions, and in this question, TO BE) is
"once outside, twice inside."
Once outside,
correct: . . . was said TO BE || either a reaction against or a return to [his style].
Twice inside,
correct: . . . was said || EITHER to be a reaction against or TO BE a return to [his style]
Once outside, once inside,
WRONG: . . . was said TO BE || either a reaction against or TO BE a return to [his style]
Once inside,
WRONG: . . . was said || EITHER to be a reaction against or a return to [his style]
In this question, we can construct only "once outside" because
return to [his style] is in the non-underlined portion. If TO BE comes after EITHER, we have no way to create "twice inside" because we cannot add TO BE after "or."
Options C and E incorrectly place TO BE only once inside.
-- If
to be follows
either, then
to be is
inside the structure because
either starts the structure.
AND if TO BE follows
either, TO BE must also follow
or.
(TO BE cannot follow
or because
or is in the non-underlined portion.)
C and E both say: . . . was said ||
EITHER to be a reaction against or a return to [his style].
What comes after
either?
TO BE a reaction againstWhat comes after
or?
a return toX and Y are not parallel.
In C and E
X = TO BE a reaction against
Y = return to
Not parallel. Eliminate C and E
• By POE, the answer is A A) . . . until the nineteenth century was said to be either a reaction against or a return to [his style]
• TO BE is once outside the idiomatic structure EITHER X OR Y - correct
• the singular verb phrase
was said to be agrees with
historythe subsequent
history[/u] of prose in not only Latin but also European languages up until the nineteenth century
was said to be• Other issues-- in the idiom NOT ONLY X BUT ALSO Y, we do not have to use
but also as long as we do not use
but at all.
-- we can
split up the BUT ALSO part.
Option D effectively lacks an
also.
The word also is in the wrong place.
-- Option E is missing the preposition
againstThis construction is weird: ". . . was said to be either a reaction or a return to [his style]
The construction is not exactly wrong, because we can use TO in reaction to in order to convey "against."
Still, compared to (A)? Option A is better.
The answer is ACOMMENTSVerbal33 ,
manjeshsp ,
TheNightKing , and
ankaua , welcome to SC Butler
I am glad to have you all.
And to the veterans (and semi-veterans), good to see your posts, too.
I like the banter and the discussion.
Of course the question writer tries to trick us!
Actually, I have to take some of the blame. As often as I can find them, I pick the questions that I think are tricky.
GMAC members are trying to trick us.
I say, do not give 'em the satisfaction.
I often give kudos for helping (though don't do so if someone is tagged)—I like generosity of spirit.
If you get an answer wrong, don't worry too much.
You can edit it if you want to . . . but as long as we are not completely out of the ballpark (idiom -- google it), I often give kudos for well-reasoned but incorrect answers.
You're sharpening your critical thinking skills.
Many of these explanations are very good.
Kudos to all.