GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Oct 2018, 06:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 389
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.76
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2018, 06:46
daagh wrote:
In this case, I am rather skeptical about the use of the modal would rather than will. Would Is normally used
1. when a direct speech that is set in the past is converted into a reported or indirect speech, where in the term will is turned into ther past would, to avoid the shift of tense.

2. As a past subjunctive, when presenting a hypothetical ness that is never going to happen.

Ex: if I were to choose to visit a planet, I would rather choose Jupiter, because it is the biggest.

3. Where you want to impart a certain degree of speculation about the event or the phenomenon

Ex: With Sachin losing his sheen, I think that Mumbai Indians would be hammered out in this IPL.
Well, it is just a crude guess and it may or may not happen. There may be other instances, but by and large, thee are the uses of the auxiliary verb would.

In this case, the climatologists have all along indicated that the most obvious effects ware those three things. In fact, it sounds as if these are the only three things that are sure to happen. There seems to be not even an iota of speculation about it. How can we use a verb such as would in such cock-sure circumstances. I rather think that the use of will be the most appropriate in the given text and in A


daagh i guess u are right but don't u think that "climatologists indicated" here means that they were not sure so i guess the *would* is right as per the point 3 of yours
_________________

Push yourself again and again. Don't give an inch until the final buzzer sounds. -Larry Bird
Success isn't something that just happens - success is learned, success is practiced and then it is shared. -Sparky Anderson
-S

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 422
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Oct 2018, 03:52
ankur55 wrote:
Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether the Earth would warm and by how much, but climatologists have indicated all along that the most obvious effects, and those that would have the largest impact on people, would be extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess.


(A) the most obvious effects, and those that would have the largest impact on people, would be extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess

(B) the effects that are the most obvious ones, extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, would be those impacting the most on people

(C) those effects to have the largest impact on people, extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, are what are the most obvious effects

(D) extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, the most obvious effects, that they would have the largest impact on people

(E) extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, which are the most obvious effects, are those to impact the most on people

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/23/science/more-extremes-found-in-weather-pointing-to-greenhouse-gas-effect.html

Discussion of the greenhouse effect has usually focused on the question of whether the earth will warm and by how much; scientists believe a doubling of greenhouse gas concentrations would raise the average global temperature by 3 to 8 degrees Fahrenheit. But climatologists have said all along that the most obvious effects, and those that will have the largest impact on people, would be extremes of temperature, precipitation and storminess.


this is hard and beautiful question. it takes me not a short time to solve. I want to add one thing.
there is an error relative to "appositition". apposition is a noun which stand be another noun and modifies this noun
the girl, the person i know , is talking with my teacher.

one kind of appositive error is that the two nouns are in wrong places. 2 places are exchanged
my friend, a good person, come to school today
a good person, my friend, comes to school today
the second sentence is wrong. the second sentence means, any good person is my friend. this make no sense

look at choice B. choice B is similar to the second sentence.

this apposition error is hard to realize , specially when we are in the test room. but this error is meaning/logic error and is prefered by gmat.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4478
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Oct 2018, 04:39
Top Contributor
Sananoor

Do you honestly believe that genuine scientists will all along indicate an unproven and doubtful hypothesis as a fact?
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4478
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Oct 2018, 04:57
Top Contributor
Salient features of this question are:

The effects are the most obvious, and the impact is the largest. We can't say the effects are the largest effect or the impact is the most obvious, notwithstanding other errors, if any.


(A) the most obvious effects, and those that would have the largest impact on people would be extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess --- Ok as per the above tenet.

(B) the effects that are the most obvious ones, extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, would be those impacting the most on people-- impacting the most is not provided for in the context. Therefore, out.

(C) those effects to have the largest impact on people, extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, are what are the most obvious effects --- are what are' is redundant -- out


(D) extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, the most obvious effects, that they would have the largest impact on people. This is a blatant fragment. Gone.

(E) extremes of temperature, precipitation, and storminess, which are the most obvious effects, are those to impact the most on people --- same as in B.

A is the last resort.
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Sep 2017
Posts: 28
CAT Tests
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Oct 2018, 05:13
GMATNinja
I have a doubt concerned to option a and the placement of comma in it. Here their are two subject for one verb. The two subjects are the most obvious effects and those so ideally we should not have a comma between most obvious effects and those. By placing a comma before and arent we violating grammatical rules.

Can you pl correct me.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether the &nbs [#permalink] 17 Oct 2018, 05:13

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 25 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.