Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 20:19 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 20:19
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 30 Oct 2025
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
8,661
 [74]
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 360
Kudos: 8,661
 [74]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
70
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Gemmie
Joined: 19 Dec 2021
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 491
Own Kudos:
426
 [5]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Technology, Economics
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
GPA: 3.55
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
Posts: 491
Kudos: 426
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [4]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 30 Oct 2025
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
8,661
 [4]
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 360
Kudos: 8,661
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
guddo
­Does it benefit a company overall to invest in employee training?

(1) Companies that invest in comprehensive employee training programs often observe improved job performance among their workforce.

(2) Well-trained employees are likely to excel in their roles and take the company forward.­
­OE from the guide:


Attachment:
GMAT-Club-Forum-ubz4n2px.png
GMAT-Club-Forum-ubz4n2px.png [ 114.46 KiB | Viewed 4732 times ]
User avatar
sayan640
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,180
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 783
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Products:
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Posts: 1,180
Kudos: 813
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Both option A and B are not sufficient is because we dont know for how long the improved job performance will continue to benefit the company overall and how much that benefit will be w.r.t to the cost incurred . Is it correct KarishmaB MartyMurray ?
KarishmaB

guddo
­Does it benefit a company overall to invest in employee training?

(1) Companies that invest in comprehensive employee training programs often observe improved job performance among their workforce.

(2) Well-trained employees are likely to excel in their roles and take the company forward.­
­The question asks us whether there is an "overall benefit" to the company.

The two statements give two benefits but do not comment on whether overall there is benefit. What if trained employees leave the company very soon because they find higher paying work outside. Then overall, the company may not benefit. We don't know.

Hence answer here is (E).
­
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [1]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sayan640
Both option A and B are not sufficient is because we dont know for how long the improved job performance will continue to benefit the company overall and how much that benefit will be w.r.t to the cost incurred . Is it correct KarishmaB MartyMurray ?
KarishmaB

guddo
­Does it benefit a company overall to invest in employee training?

(1) Companies that invest in comprehensive employee training programs often observe improved job performance among their workforce.

(2) Well-trained employees are likely to excel in their roles and take the company forward.­
­The question asks us whether there is an "overall benefit" to the company.

The two statements give two benefits but do not comment on whether overall there is benefit. What if trained employees leave the company very soon because they find higher paying work outside. Then overall, the company may not benefit. We don't know.

Hence answer here is (E).
­
­
Yes, overall benefit means that whatever cost was invested in the training, that and more is recovered. But say if people leave immeditaely after training because they become skilled and hence valued by other companies too, overall the company training them may not be recovering their cost even. Or it is even possible that even if people stay, the training is so expensive that it doesn't lead to overall benefit.
User avatar
SirSanguine
Joined: 08 Jun 2022
Last visit: 13 May 2025
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q90 V81 DI84
GPA: 4
WE:General Management (Education)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q90 V81 DI84
Posts: 79
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB

guddo
­Does it benefit a company overall to invest in employee training?

(1) Companies that invest in comprehensive employee training programs often observe improved job performance among their workforce.

(2) Well-trained employees are likely to excel in their roles and take the company forward.­
­The question asks us whether there is an "overall benefit" to the company.

The two statements give two benefits but do not comment on whether overall there is benefit. What if trained employees leave the company very soon because they find higher paying work outside. Then overall, the company may not benefit. We don't know.

Hence answer here is (E).
­Hi KarishmaB thanks for the answer; can you also suggest what can be a potentially correct statement? My doubt is..any statement would have to say explicitly " Over all benefits"; or something like "increased realised profits" to be a correct statement. The correct statement shall contain clear declaration, which makes this a easy question. Or is it possible to imply the same without saying it explicitly?­
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [3]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SirSanguine

KarishmaB

guddo
­Does it benefit a company overall to invest in employee training?

(1) Companies that invest in comprehensive employee training programs often observe improved job performance among their workforce.

(2) Well-trained employees are likely to excel in their roles and take the company forward.­
­The question asks us whether there is an "overall benefit" to the company.

The two statements give two benefits but do not comment on whether overall there is benefit. What if trained employees leave the company very soon because they find higher paying work outside. Then overall, the company may not benefit. We don't know.

Hence answer here is (E).
­Hi KarishmaB thanks for the answer; can you also suggest what can be a potentially correct statement? My doubt is..any statement would have to say explicitly " Over all benefits"; or something like "increased realised profits" to be a correct statement. The correct statement shall contain clear declaration, which makes this a easy question. Or is it possible to imply the same without saying it explicitly?­
­
The point is what is missing - and whether you were able to identify that. They will not give the exact words because yes, that question would become too easy but for it to be sufficient we certainly need something that implies that overall benefit is there, e.g. something that says that cost to the company is negligible etc.
They will rather miss a word and then see whether you were able to figure out what is missing.
User avatar
Krunaal
User avatar
Tuck School Moderator
Joined: 15 Feb 2021
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 805
Own Kudos:
850
 [1]
Given Kudos: 251
Status:Under the Square and Compass
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q90 V90 DI82
GPA: 5.78
WE:Marketing (Consulting)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How I would go about in such a question is - think a one pro and one con hypothetically

(1) Companies that invest in comprehensive employee training programs often observe improved job performance among their workforce.

Pro - What if the improved job performance will increase companies profits? The investment would be worth, it will possibly benefit the company.

Con - What if the improved job performance was not able to offset the cost the company invested in training :( => no overall benefit to company

We don't have a conclusive answer. INSUFFICIENT

(2) Well-trained employees are likely to excel in their roles and take the company forward.­

Pro - What if the taking the company forward meant increase in companies' profits? The investment would be worth, it will possibly benefit the company.

Con - What if the the company did go forward in terms of efficiency but still that was not able to offset the cost the company invested in training :( => no overall benefit to company

We don't have a conclusive answer. INSUFFICIENT

Both Together

Even if we combine both the statements, we can see that the judgement on whether it was beneficial for company to invest still remains clouded; and we don't have a conclusive answer. INSUFFICIENT

Answer E.­
User avatar
AT1982
Joined: 21 Nov 2023
Last visit: 28 May 2025
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 21
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
­Does it benefit a company overall to invest in employee training?

(1) Companies that invest in comprehensive employee training programs often observe improved job performance among their workforce.

(2) Well-trained employees are likely to excel in their roles and take the company forward.­
­Company - employee trg - overall benefit (Overall benefit means monetary, can be evaluate. For example, $1 mn for employee trg , overall benefit - more than overall investment)

A. Incr job performance - maybe sufficient/ not adequate to cross the profit margin. Maybe beneficial but extra expenditure can be reduced or dveloped in-house. THE TERM OFTEN(*) BUT NOT ALWAYS
B. Selected only excel, balance we don't. ONLY WELL TRAINED(*) BUT NOT ALL
A&B. Again selected excel with adequate imrovement but not sufficient. Maybe the trg was abroad/outside, sufficient absence of employee affected budget planning.
User avatar
D3N0
Joined: 21 Jan 2015
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 587
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 132
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V28
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V35
WE:Operations (Retail: E-commerce)
Products:
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V35
Posts: 587
Kudos: 572
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I Wasn't expecting CR questions on the DS part of the GMAT.
lol
User avatar
pappal
Joined: 24 Nov 2022
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 116
Own Kudos:
45
 [1]
Given Kudos: 52
Posts: 116
Kudos: 45
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
trick in the question is "often" and "likely" mentioned that create doubt in both statements taken individually or together that there will be an overall profit for the company.
User avatar
SundayRoast
Joined: 29 Oct 2024
Last visit: 23 Jul 2025
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Posts: 40
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The OG explanation for this question is directly contradictory to this question. https://gmatclub.com/forum/it-has-been- ... l#p3537057
User avatar
saynchalk
Joined: 17 Sep 2023
Last visit: 16 Oct 2025
Posts: 199
Own Kudos:
225
 [4]
Given Kudos: 835
Status:Always questioning myself
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, International Business
Schools: CBS
GMAT Focus 1: 525 Q74 V82 DI72
GPA: 3.1
WE:Sales (Computer Software)
Schools: CBS
GMAT Focus 1: 525 Q74 V82 DI72
Posts: 199
Kudos: 225
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tip for non math related DS questions: terms like "Likely" and "may" are indicators that whatever it is, it doesn't apply to the current situation.
User avatar
agrasan
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 534
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5,193
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 534
Kudos: 130
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi experts MartyMurray KarishmaB GMATNinja,

(2) Well-trained employees are likely to excel in their roles and take the company forward.­

I need some clarification on statement (2), is the word "likely" meant for both excel in their roles and take the company forward OR only for excel in their roles.

If yes, then can we say that (2) is not sufficient because it is likely, not a certainty?
If no, then (2) should be sufficient right? Because take the company forward becomes a certainty and it means that company is progressing, hence, an overall benefit.

Please help me with these two questions.


guddo
­Does it benefit a company overall to invest in employee training?

(1) Companies that invest in comprehensive employee training programs often observe improved job performance among their workforce.

(2) Well-trained employees are likely to excel in their roles and take the company forward.­
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [2]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Even without 'likely,' 2 is not sufficient. We want to know whether OVERALL the company benefits.
If the company must invest $10 million in employee training and makes only $5 million because of well trained employees, does the company benefit overall?
If the company invests $1 million to train 500 employees and 400 of them leave the company immediately after training, does the company benefit overall?
There are many ifs and buts to reach the 'overall benefit' conclusion.


agrasan
Hi experts MartyMurray KarishmaB GMATNinja,

(2) Well-trained employees are likely to excel in their roles and take the company forward.­

I need some clarification on statement (2), is the word "likely" meant for both excel in their roles and take the company forward OR only for excel in their roles.

If yes, then can we say that (2) is not sufficient because it is likely, not a certainty?
If no, then (2) should be sufficient right? Because take the company forward becomes a certainty and it means that company is progressing, hence, an overall benefit.

Please help me with these two questions.


guddo
­Does it benefit a company overall to invest in employee training?

(1) Companies that invest in comprehensive employee training programs often observe improved job performance among their workforce.

(2) Well-trained employees are likely to excel in their roles and take the company forward.­
User avatar
Robo_123
Joined: 30 Jan 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 72
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q84 V81 DI80
GPA: 7.8
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q84 V81 DI80
Posts: 72
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
my 2 cents on this one - overall benefit would also include finances, right? what if the cost they put to train them is way too high compared to the goodness it brings. Hence, there are caveats that the company needs to take care of.
User avatar
kdipayan
Joined: 19 Sep 2025
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Products:
Posts: 10
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is this on the same line as Correlation is not Causality!
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts