GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Oct 2018, 11:05

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government (2)

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 02 May 2016
Posts: 77
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship
GRE 1: Q163 V154
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government (2)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 28 Dec 2017, 10:20
5
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

64% (01:50) correct 36% (02:00) wrong based on 168 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker's income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.

Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?

(A) The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.

(B) Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.

(C) At any given time, people who are currently employed have the best chance of being offered a job that will give them an income significantly greater than government assistance would give them.

(D) The financial assistance that the government provides to people who have no other income is less than the average starting wage.

(E) People sometimes choose a job for reasons that have nothing to do with the financial benefits it offers.

Same passage with different stem question: LINK

I faced this question in GMATPrep Exam 3, but the answer choices were quite different from what stated here.
Attached is image for reference.
Needless to say, I got it wrong :P

Attachment:
LedlandUnemployed.jpg
LedlandUnemployed.jpg [ 293.07 KiB | Viewed 1667 times ]

Originally posted by AkshayKS21 on 16 Jun 2017, 05:31.
Last edited by broall on 28 Dec 2017, 10:20, edited 2 times in total.
Reformatted question
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Status: Aiming MBA!!
Joined: 19 Aug 2017
Posts: 118
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V25
GPA: 3.75
WE: Web Development (Consulting)
Reviews Badge
Re: Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government (2)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Nov 2017, 23:10
AkshayKS21 wrote:
I faced this question in GMATPrep Exam 3, but the answer choices were quite different from what stated here.
Attached is image for reference.
Needless to say, I got it wrong :P


the conclusion -- unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.

(D) The financial assistance that the government provides to people who have no other income is less than the average starting wage.

As per my understanding, option D also weakens somewhat, but C is the better one. As we are looking for the best option out of the five. My reasoning for option D,

If the government provides financial assistance which is less than the average starting wage to people with no other source of income, then such people would be more interested in doing the job rather than relying on the financial assistance itself. Also, if you notice carefully, the conclusion is about the UNEMPLOYED PEOPLE but we do not know whether they have some other source of income or not. Unemployment does not mean that THEY WILL definitely does not have the other sources of INCOME AS WELL. So, if the unemployed people are not having the other sources of income as well, then the conclusion is strongly weakened. But if the unemployed people are having some other sources of income, then the starting wage may not seem lucrative to such people even if it is more than the financial assistance. So, option C is the clear winner.

GMATNinja, can you please review my reasoning for option D, the one mentioned in the GMATPrep snapshot just above my post and not the one in the existing post on the GMATClub.

Thanks.
-aceGMAT21.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 30 Jan 2017
Posts: 82
Location: India
Schools: ISB '19
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 3: 730 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.9
Re: Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government (2)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Nov 2017, 05:04
1
GMATNinja

Please review my reasoning for eliminating option D:

Let's assign numbers to the scenario mentioned in the argument:

1. Current income of unemployed adults: $0
2. Government assistance provided to unemployed adults: $100
3. Salary of Jobs below the government supplement: $60
5. New Government assistance: $40

Option D : The financial assistance that the government provides ($40) to people who have no other income is less than the average starting wage ($60).

SO WHAT ? The sum total of what the unemployed people get under the new scheme is still $100. It strengthens the conclusion of the argument that THERE IS NO FINANCIAL INCENTIVE BECAUSE THE PEOPLE STILL GET $100 in total

Hence, we can eliminate option D
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 09 Nov 2016
Posts: 66
Location: India
Reviews Badge
Re: Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government (2)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Dec 2017, 09:52
Hi Verbal Experts,

Could you please elaborate on why option D over here is wrong with an example?
I am a bit confused between C & D.

Thanks in advance! :-)
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
S
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Posts: 264
CAT Tests
Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government (2)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 29 Dec 2017, 16:50
1
1
Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker's income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.

Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?

(A) The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.

(B) Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.

(C) At any given time, people who are currently employed have the best chance of being offered a job that will give them an income significantly greater than government assistance would give them.

(D) The financial assistance that the government provides to people who have no other income is less than the average starting wage.

(E) People sometimes choose a job for reasons that have nothing to do with the financial benefits it offers.


Edit: Moderator Editorial Note: this is a different topic from https://gmatclub.com/forum/editorial-in ... ml#p281146 due to the answer choices.

_________________

www.gmatninja.com


Originally posted by GMATNinjaTwo on 28 Dec 2017, 09:34.
Last edited by GMATNinjaTwo on 29 Dec 2017, 16:50, edited 3 times in total.
updated link in Mod. Editorial Note
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
S
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Posts: 264
CAT Tests
Re: Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government (2)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2017, 09:52
1
GMATNinjaTwo wrote:
Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker's income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.

Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?

(A) The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.

(B) Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.

(C) At any given time, people who are currently employed have the best chance of being offered a job that will give them an income significantly greater than government assistance would give them.

(D) The financial assistance that the government provides to people who have no other income is less than the average starting wage.

(E) People sometimes choose a job for reasons that have nothing to do with the financial benefits it offers.

SidJainGMAT wrote:
Hi Verbal Experts,

Could you please elaborate on why option D over here is wrong with an example?
I am a bit confused between C & D.

Thanks in advance! :-)

Note that this question is similar to another based on the same passage from EP1: https://gmatclub.com/forum/editorial-in ... 40473.html. Choices C, D, and E are slightly different.

As for choice (D) in this version, please refer to the following explanation by fmik7894:

fmik7894 wrote:
GMATNinja

Please review my reasoning for eliminating option D:

Let's assign numbers to the scenario mentioned in the argument:

1. Current income of unemployed adults: $0
2. Government assistance provided to unemployed adults: $100
3. Salary of Jobs below the government supplement: $60
5. New Government assistance: $40

Option D : The financial assistance that the government provides ($40) to people who have no other income is less than the average starting wage ($60).

SO WHAT ? The sum total of what the unemployed people get under the new scheme is still $100. It strengthens the conclusion of the argument that THERE IS NO FINANCIAL INCENTIVE BECAUSE THE PEOPLE STILL GET $100 in total

Hence, we can eliminate option D


Thanks fmik7894, your reasoning was spot on!
_________________

www.gmatninja.com

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government (2) &nbs [#permalink] 28 Dec 2017, 09:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government (2)

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.