GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 24 Jan 2019, 04:50

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Key Strategies to Master GMAT SC

     January 26, 2019

     January 26, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Attend this webinar to learn how to leverage Meaning and Logic to solve the most challenging Sentence Correction Questions.
  • Free GMAT Number Properties Webinar

     January 27, 2019

     January 27, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Attend this webinar to learn a structured approach to solve 700+ Number Properties question in less than 2 minutes.

Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Senior CR Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1368
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 21 Sep 2017, 06:56
9
20
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

50% (02:00) correct 50% (02:23) wrong based on 831 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly, and local political business is usually conducted secretively. These factors each tend to isolate local politicians from their electorates. This has the effect of reducing the chance that any particular act of resident participation will elicit a positive official response, which in turn discourages resident participation in local politics.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the editorialist’s statements?

(A) Particular acts of resident participation would be likely to elicit a positive response from local politicians if those politicians were less isolated from their electorate.

(B) Local political business should be conducted less secretively because this would avoid discouraging resident participation in local politics.

(C) The most important factor influencing a resident’s decision as to whether to participate in local politics is the chance that the participation will elicit a positive official response.

(D) More-frequent thorough coverage of local politics would reduce at least one source of discouragement from resident participation in local politics.

(E) If resident participation in local politics were not discouraged, this would cause local politicians to be less isolated from their electorate.

Source: LSAT

_________________

Actual LSAT CR bank by Broall

How to solve quadratic equations - Factor quadratic equations
Factor table with sign: The useful tool to solve polynomial inequalities
Applying AM-GM inequality into finding extreme/absolute value

New Error Log with Timer


Originally posted by broall on 18 Sep 2017, 18:56.
Last edited by broall on 21 Sep 2017, 06:56, edited 1 time in total.
Corrected OA
Most Helpful Community Reply
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 04 Apr 2016
Posts: 18
Re: Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Sep 2017, 04:17
7
1
sobby wrote:
broall wrote:
Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly, and local political business is usually conducted secretively. These factors each tend to isolate local politicians from their electorates. This has the effect of reducing the chance that any particular act of resident participation will elicit a positive official response, which in turn discourages resident participation in local politics.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the editorialist’s statements?

(A) Particular acts of resident participation would be likely to elicit a positive response from local politicians if those politicians were less isolated from their electorate.

(B) Local political business should be conducted less secretively because this would avoid discouraging resident participation in local politics.

(C) The most important factor influencing a resident’s decision as to whether to participate in local politics is the chance that the participation will elicit a positive official response.

(D) More-frequent thorough coverage of local politics would reduce at least one source of discouragement from resident participation in local politics.

(E) If resident participation in local politics were not discouraged, this would cause local politicians to be less isolated from their electorate.

Source: LSAT


The Argument is basically showing the impact of less New coverage ..Only option D talks about news coverage and its effect in reducing discouragement of resident in participating local politics.



Answer is D

D is correct because, since the stimulus tells us that both local political secrecy and insufficient news coverage contribute to politicians being isolated, which in turn contributes to a decrease in resident participation, reducing either of these original factors (local political secrecy and insufficient news coverage) would, necessarily, reduce at least one sort of discouragement against resident participation that currently exists.

E is incorrect because, though the contrapositive tells us that if resident participation were not discouraged, insufficient news coverage could not be a problem, the causality of this relationship has been lost - it is not true that increased resident participation would then have necessrily caused better news coverage.
_________________

Keep giving Kudos if you find the post useful :)

General Discussion
Director
Director
avatar
P
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 632
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
Re: Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2017, 10:04
broall wrote:
Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly, and local political business is usually conducted secretively. These factors each tend to isolate local politicians from their electorates. This has the effect of reducing the chance that any particular act of resident participation will elicit a positive official response, which in turn discourages resident participation in local politics.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the editorialist’s statements?

(A) Particular acts of resident participation would be likely to elicit a positive response from local politicians if those politicians were less isolated from their electorate.

(B) Local political business should be conducted less secretively because this would avoid discouraging resident participation in local politics.

(C) The most important factor influencing a resident’s decision as to whether to participate in local politics is the chance that the participation will elicit a positive official response.

(D) More-frequent thorough coverage of local politics would reduce at least one source of discouragement from resident participation in local politics.

(E) If resident participation in local politics were not discouraged, this would cause local politicians to be less isolated from their electorate.

Source: LSAT


The Argument is basically showing the impact of less New coverage ..Only option D talks about news coverage and its effect in reducing discouragement of resident in participating local politics.
Director
Director
User avatar
D
Joined: 27 May 2012
Posts: 672
Premium Member
Re: Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2017, 04:42
1
broall wrote:
Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly, and local political business is usually conducted secretively. These factors each tend to isolate local politicians from their electorates. This has the effect of reducing the chance that any particular act of resident participation will elicit a positive official response, which in turn discourages resident participation in local politics.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the editorialist’s statements?

(A) Particular acts of resident participation would be likely to elicit a positive response from local politicians if those politicians were less isolated from their electorate.

(B) Local political business should be conducted less secretively because this would avoid discouraging resident participation in local politics.

(C) The most important factor influencing a resident’s decision as to whether to participate in local politics is the chance that the participation will elicit a positive official response.

(D) More-frequent thorough coverage of local politics would reduce at least one source of discouragement from resident participation in local politics.

(E) If resident participation in local politics were not discouraged, this would cause local politicians to be less isolated from their electorate.

Source: LSAT

Are LSAT CR questions actual representative of GMAT CR.
Seem to be getting most of these wrong.
Here went with A .
_________________

- Stne

Director
Director
avatar
P
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 632
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
Re: Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2017, 06:46
hi broall

Can you please check the OA ...i think , it is not correct...
Senior CR Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1368
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2017, 06:58
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 474
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Re: Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Oct 2017, 04:56
Hi Broall,

I was oscillating between D and E, but ended up on wrong side

I have one question regarding E,

Premise: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly, and local political business is usually conducted secretively. These factors each tend to isolate local politicians from their electorates. This has the effect of reducing the chance that any particular act of resident participation will elicit a positive official response, which in turn discourages resident participation in local politics.

News Media rare coverage and business conducted secretively -> isolation of local politicians from their electorates -> less chance of positive official response -> discourage residente participation.

Contra Positive: no discourage of resident participation -> more chance of positive official response -> less isolation of local politicians -> news media more coverage.

is n't answer choice E, saying contrapositive?

If resident participation in local politics were not discouraged, this would cause local politicians to be less isolated from their electorate.
no discourage of resident partipation -> less isolation of local politicians , is n't this correct?

Please help

Thanks
Senior CR Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1368
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Nov 2017, 01:24
hellosanthosh2k2 wrote:
Hi Broall,

I was oscillating between D and E, but ended up on wrong side

I have one question regarding E,

Premise: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly, and local political business is usually conducted secretively. These factors each tend to isolate local politicians from their electorates. This has the effect of reducing the chance that any particular act of resident participation will elicit a positive official response, which in turn discourages resident participation in local politics.

News Media rare coverage and business conducted secretively -> isolation of local politicians from their electorates -> less chance of positive official response -> discourage residente participation.

Contra Positive: no discourage of resident participation -> more chance of positive official response -> less isolation of local politicians -> news media more coverage.

is n't answer choice E, saying contrapositive?

If resident participation in local politics were not discouraged, this would cause local politicians to be less isolated from their electorate.
no discourage of resident partipation -> less isolation of local politicians , is n't this correct?

Please help

Thanks


I think that the logic in this question is: X->Y and Y->Z thus X->Z. Since the question asks the answer choice that the argument most strongly supports, we come to choice B, which states the conclusion that X->Z. Other choices just conclude Y->Z so aren't good enough.
_________________

Actual LSAT CR bank by Broall

How to solve quadratic equations - Factor quadratic equations
Factor table with sign: The useful tool to solve polynomial inequalities
Applying AM-GM inequality into finding extreme/absolute value

New Error Log with Timer

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Jan 2018
Posts: 1
Re: Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2018, 06:57
Anyone please explain to me why A is wrong?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Oct 2017
Posts: 248
GMAT 1: 710 Q44 V41
Re: Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jun 2018, 01:33
minbiebs wrote:
Anyone please explain to me why A is wrong?

Let's take a look at A:
Quote:
(A) Particular acts of resident participation would be likely to elicit a positive response from local politicians if those politicians were less isolated from their electorate


The problematic word is "likely". We know that the low coverage of local news and secretive conduct of local political businesses leads to isolation of local politicians from their electorate. If these problems were remedied the isolation would be reduced and it would become more likely that resident participation would result in positive responses from local politicians. We just know that the likelihood would increase but we don't know by how much. Hence, we can't state that resident participation would likely result in positive responses. This is why answer A is incorrect.

Hope that helps :-)
_________________

My goal: 700 GMAT score - REACHED :-) | My debrief - first attempt 710 (Q44,V41,IR7)

If I could help you with my answer, consider giving me Kudos

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Aug 2016
Posts: 14
Re: Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2018, 18:32
Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly, and local political business is usually conducted secretively. These factors each tend to isolate local politicians from their electorates. This has the effect of reducing the chance that any particular act of resident participation will elicit a positive official response, which in turn discourages resident participation in local politics.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the editorialist’s statements?

(A) Particular acts of resident participation would be likely to elicit a positive response from local politicians if those politicians were less isolated from their electorate.

(Incorrect:-we know isolation results in discouragement. But it does not mean less isolation will result in positive response)

(B) Local political business should be conducted less secretively because this would avoid discouraging resident participation in local politics.

(Incorrect:-cannot infer anything"moral" from the information given)

(C) The most important factor influencing a resident’s decision as to whether to participate in local politics is the chance that the participation will elicit a positive official response.

(Incorrect:-does not have to be the "most important factor". Only need to be an important factor in making the decision)

(D) More-frequent thorough coverage of local politics would reduce at least one source of discouragement from resident participation in local politics.

(Correct:- since the positive response has to be an important factor affecting the decision, thus more frequent coverage will illicit some positive response and hence will reduce discouragement at least a little)

(E) If resident participation in local politics were not discouraged, this would cause local politicians to be less isolated from their electorate.

(incorrect:- cannot be inferred)



facts:-
1) local politics conducted secretively
2) media does not conduct thorough coverage of local politics

Result:- local politicians isolated from their electorates

Conclusion:- Discourage resident participation in Local Politics
Premise:- local politicians isolated from their electorates. little chance of a positive official response


Under what conditions will the conclusion not hold true:- residents are not discouraged?

"when a positive official response is not an important factor in deciding to participate in the local politics.

Hence, positive response has to be an important decisive factor. It need not be the most important one.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 28 May 2018
Posts: 75
Re: Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2018, 08:12
Quote:
News Media rare coverage and business conducted secretively -> isolation of local politicians from their electorates -> less chance of positive official response -> discourage residente participation.

Contra Positive: no discourage of resident participation -> more chance of positive official response -> less isolation of local politicians -> news media more coverage.

is n't answer choice E, saying contrapositive?

If resident participation in local politics were not discouraged, this would cause local politicians to be less isolated from their electorate.
no discourage of resident partipation -> less isolation of local politicians , isn't this correct?


Hi GMATNinja,
I have used the same strategy and marked E. I am not able to eliminate E. Could you please help here. Why is E wrong?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2256
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Oct 2018, 07:59
1
guptakashish02 wrote:
Quote:
News Media rare coverage and business conducted secretively -> isolation of local politicians from their electorates -> less chance of positive official response -> discourage residente participation.

Contra Positive: no discourage of resident participation -> more chance of positive official response -> less isolation of local politicians -> news media more coverage.

is n't answer choice E, saying contrapositive?

If resident participation in local politics were not discouraged, this would cause local politicians to be less isolated from their electorate.
no discourage of resident partipation -> less isolation of local politicians , isn't this correct?


Hi GMATNinja,
I have used the same strategy and marked E. I am not able to eliminate E. Could you please help here. Why is E wrong?

Let's stay focused on reading the argument carefully before trying to apply any kind of test to it:

Quote:
Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly, and local political business is usually conducted secretively. These factors each tend to isolate local politicians from their electorates. This has the effect of reducing the chance that any particular act of resident participation will elicit a positive official response, which in turn discourages resident participation in local politics.

This is a lot of information to take in, but the editorialist is basically telling us about a sequence of actions. So let's break up this sequence into individual steps:

  • News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly. At the same time, local political business is usually conducted secretively.
  • These two factors result in the isolation of local politicians from their electorates.
  • The isolation of local politicians from electorates results in a lower chance that any act of resident participation will elicit a positive official response.
  • When there is a lower chance that any act of resident participation will elicit a positive official response, then residents will be discouraged from participating in local politics.

Now, is choice (E) supported by the breakdown above?

Quote:
(E) If resident participation in local politics were not discouraged, this would cause local politicians to be less isolated from their electorate.

Huh? Not discouraging resident participation would cause local politicians to be less isolated? This seems backwards.

The editorialist told us that local politicians become isolated from their electorates. Then, as a result of the isolation, the chance of a positive response due to resident participation goes down. Then, as a result of this chance going down, residents are discouraged from participating in local politics.

Choice (E) reads in the opposite direction, which contradicts the entire flow of logic that the argument has set up. So (E) can't be supported by the editorialist's statements. The sequence of events being described just doesn't line up.

That's why we can eliminate (E). I hope this helps!
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | Instagram | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly &nbs [#permalink] 25 Oct 2018, 07:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Editorialist: News media rarely cover local politics thoroughly

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.