Last visit was: 11 Sep 2024, 05:23 It is currently 11 Sep 2024, 05:23
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Tags:
Difficulty: 605-655 Level,   Non-Math Related,               
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Posts: 220
Own Kudos [?]: 11674 [19]
Given Kudos: 49
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jul 2018
Posts: 348
Own Kudos [?]: 478 [2]
Given Kudos: 94
Send PM
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Posts: 3127
Own Kudos [?]: 2840 [4]
Given Kudos: 1511
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Send PM
VP
VP
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Posts: 1326
Own Kudos [?]: 864 [1]
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
Send PM
Re: Educational policy analyst: To improve the long-term economic benefits [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Bolstered statement 1 by statement 2

->>Statement 1 is supported by statement 2
>Means statement2 support statemnent1
Means st2--> sta1

(Hiring more academic staff(x) smaller class sizes(y)receive higher grades(z) economic wellbeing of graduates (w)
Statmenet 2: receive higher grades  statement1: economic well being i
>>economic well being is supported by tendency to earn higher grades in university classes

A:Supported statement = 2(tendency to earn higher grades in university classes)
B:: conclusion: outcome --> economic well being of graduates )= 1
C: weaken
D: not mentioned
E: not mentioned
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2019
Posts: 19
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: Educational policy analyst: To improve the long-term economic benefits [#permalink]
At first, I got lost and couldn't think of systematic approach of which statement to start with. You suggested a good way to think about the problem. It's essentially a "Cause and Effect" type of problem. Classifying the end statement (effect) first and then finding Cause... is good approach.

yashikaaggarwal wrote:
Bolstered means getting support.

The question asked. Which supported (2) which (1) as per the given passage.

The end results are often what which is been supported by factors because we know that it definitely worked. For ex- rain in tropical region supported better cultivation.
Cultivation is the end result supported by rain.
So statement 1 has to be an end result..
The end result as per the passage is the economic well being life style one incurs after graduation.

1) tendency to earn higher grades in university classes

2) economic wellbeing after graduating from university (the end result)

3) being in larger than average university classes

4) receiving better education overall

5) learning from a greater number of academic staff

So, Statement 1 is economic wellbeing after graduating from university

Now what supported this?
=> learning from greater no. Of academic staff. It can be. But how will his direct benefit is connected with academic staff. So no its not the support system.

=> receiving better education, yes it can be a point but still not the direct support which on needed for a well off economic condition.

=> being in larger class, but what are the chances that it will help all for sure?

=> tendency to earn higher grades in university classes, it is the support needed for a better life Style after graduation as stated in passage too. People need good marks to get graduate, academic staff, larger classes all are secondary support. So,this is providing the direct support.

Statement 2 is tendency to earn higher grades in university classes

Posted from my mobile device
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 14018
Own Kudos [?]: 38706 [1]
Given Kudos: 5865
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: Educational policy analyst: To improve the long-term economic benefits [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Official Explanation

Select for 1 and 2 the options that complete the statement in the manner that most accurately reflects the given information. Make only two selections, one in each column.

Explanation

We are asked to complete the statement so that it is an accurate reflection of the information provided in the educational policy analyst’s argument.

The educational policy analyst asserts that hiring more academic staff would allow smaller class sizes, and that on average, a student who earns higher grades in university classes tends to have a higher salary after graduation than a student who earns lower grades. This leads the analyst to conclude that hiring more academic staff would improve the economic wellbeing of graduates nationwide. Given this conclusion in conjunction with the analyst’s other assertions, according to the analyst’s argument, students’ economic wellbeing after graduation from university is bolstered by their tendency to earn higher grades in university classes.

The analyst makes no claims about the quality of education overall or the number of academic staff students learn from. Furthermore, the only implication with respect to larger university class sizes is that they would likely not bolster either grades or salaries. Therefore, no other pair of options completes the statement so that it is an accurate reflection of the information provided.

Answer:

1: economic wellbeing after graduating from university
2: tendency to earn higher grades in university classes
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jul 2022
Posts: 410
Own Kudos [?]: 819 [0]
Given Kudos: 284
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Nonprofit
GPA: 3.74
WE:Corporate Finance (Non-Profit and Government)
Send PM
Re: Educational policy analyst: To improve the long-term economic benefits [#permalink]
yashikaaggarwal wrote:
Bolstered means getting support.

The question asked. Which supported (2) which (1) as per the given passage.

The end results are often what which is been supported by factors because we know that it definitely worked. For ex- rain in tropical region supported better cultivation.
Cultivation is the end result supported by rain.
So statement 1 has to be an end result..
The end result as per the passage is the economic well being life style one incurs after graduation.

1) tendency to earn higher grades in university classes

2) economic wellbeing after graduating from university (the end result)

3) being in larger than average university classes

4) receiving better education overall

5) learning from a greater number of academic staff

So, Statement 1 is economic wellbeing after graduating from university

Now what supported this?
=> learning from greater no. Of academic staff. It can be. But how will his direct benefit is connected with academic staff. So no its not the support system.

=> receiving better education, yes it can be a point but still not the direct support which on needed for a well off economic condition.

=> being in larger class, but what are the chances that it will help all for sure?

=> tendency to earn higher grades in university classes, it is the support needed for a better life Style after graduation as stated in passage too. People need good marks to get graduate, academic staff, larger classes all are secondary support. So,this is providing the direct support.

Statement 2 is tendency to earn higher grades in university classes

Posted from my mobile device


Hi,

Why can't the combination be 1-A and 2-E?

Test grades and smaller classes are related.

Doesnt smaller class imply learning from more academic staff?
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Jun 2023
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Educational policy analyst: To improve the long-term economic benefits [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Explanation:
We are asked to complete the statement so that it is an accurate reflection of the information provided in the educational policy analyst's argument.

The educational policy analyst asserts that hiring more academic staff would allow smaller class sizes, and that on average, a student who earns higher grades in university classes tends to have a higher salary after graduation than a student who earns lower grades. This leads the analyst to conclude that hiring more academic staff would improve the economic wellbeing of graduates nationwide. Given this conclusion in conjunction with the analyst's other assertions, according to the analyst's argument, students' economic wellbeing after graduation from university is bolstered by their tendency to earn higher grades in university classes.

The analyst makes no claims about the quality of education overall or the number of academic staff students learn from. Furthermore, the only implication with respect to larger university class sizes is that they would likely not bolster either grades or salaries. Therefore, no other pair of options completes the statement so that it is an accurate reflection of the information provided.

A. Evaluate

The correct answer is economic wellbeing after graduating from university.

B. Evaluate

The correct answer is tendency to earn higher grades in university classes.
Tutor
Joined: 16 Jul 2014
Status:GMAT Coach
Affiliations: The GMAT Co.
Posts: 106
Own Kudos [?]: 412 [3]
Given Kudos: 18
Concentration: Strategy
Schools: IIMA (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V41
Send PM
Re: Educational policy analyst: To improve the long-term economic benefits [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
Quote:
Doesnt smaller class imply learning from more academic staff?

­
No. 

‘Smaller classes’ means fewer students in a class. That doesn’t mean that students are taking more courses or are learning from more teachers.

Say a particular course was taught by one teacher.
50 students, 1 teacher.

And then say another teacher is added for that course.

Now the 50 students would be split into two groups, and each teacher will handle one group each. That's a smaller class.

However, each student will still learn from one teacher.

Makes sense?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Nov 2021
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 22
Send PM
Re: Educational policy analyst: To improve the long-term economic benefits [#permalink]
Hi

Though I agree with the solution but i am not able to eliminate the options that I choose.
1) tendency to earn higher grades in university classes
2) learning from a greater number of academic staff
In the argument we are already told that chances of getting higher grades increases as class size becomes smaller as a result of more staff hiring.
So why can't the complete the sentence like this:
According to the analyst???s argument, students??? "tendency to earn higher grades in university classes" is bolstered by their "learning from a greater number of academic staff".

Is it because the in the second blank we are mentioning about the strength of academic staff and nothing about the class size.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Educational policy analyst: To improve the long-term economic benefits [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
95450 posts
Retired Moderator
997 posts
RC & DI Moderator
11513 posts