Last visit was: 14 Sep 2024, 20:33 It is currently 14 Sep 2024, 20:33
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Aug 2019
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2018
Posts: 213
Own Kudos [?]: 69 [0]
Given Kudos: 261
Send PM
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 3504
Own Kudos [?]: 7055 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Jan 2018
Posts: 15
Own Kudos [?]: 16 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Re: Even within the same study, people responded quite differently to [#permalink]
Hi,

Abhi077

I am completely lost with Ellipsis. I made notes on the question by saying :
.... , while others did not (" show increased flexibility - show verb not available in the previous part, hence wrong).

Now my question is: I tried extending this idea to a question from Veritas :
" https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-plateau-in-global-warming-that-took-place-in-the-1950-s-and-60-s-i-216116.html"

The question goes: pollution from dirty factories may have played a role, just as natural variability did in ocean circulation.

I eliminated this choice saying - natural Variability did (play - required but not available in the previous half of sentence.) .
Pl enlighten me what am I missing when reading the ellipsis. Thank you
SC Moderator
Joined: 25 Sep 2018
Posts: 1100
Own Kudos [?]: 2272 [0]
Given Kudos: 1665
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.97
WE:Investment Banking (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: Even within the same study, people responded quite differently to [#permalink]
vishaldec4
Hi,

Abhi077

I am completely lost with Ellipsis. I made notes on the question by saying :
.... , while others did not (" show increased flexibility - show verb not available in the previous part, hence wrong).

Now my question is: I tried extending this idea to a question from Veritas :
" https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-plateau-in-global-warming-that-took-place-in-the-1950-s-and-60-s-i-216116.html"

The question goes: pollution from dirty factories may have played a role, just as natural variability did in ocean circulation.

I eliminated this choice saying - natural Variability did (play - required but not available in the previous half of sentence.) .
Pl enlighten me what am I missing when reading the ellipsis. Thank you

Ellipses can be tough and confusing to tackle if you lack conceptual understanding of it I suggest you go through these articles https://e-gmat.com/blogs/ellipses-in-co ... ing-verbs/
https://gmatclub.com/forum/ellipsis-sub ... 46823.html
GMAT has evolved way past hard and fast rules, what may apply to one particular question might not apply to another. each question is different with respect to its structure and meaning. I hope these articles help :)
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2020
Posts: 149
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 1711
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q45 V41
GPA: 3
Send PM
Re: Even within the same study, people responded quite differently to [#permalink]
“with other nations … holding” —- this structure is common in colloquial speech, but the GMAT doesn’t like this at all: “with” + [noun] + [participle]. The prepositions “with” is designed to hold a noun, maybe even a modified noun, but not an entire action. This choice is incorrect.

Got this from Magoosh's blog on Absolute phrases. Considering this, shouldn't E be incorrect as well ?
D should be the right answer in my opinion. Can anybody explain this ?
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2735
Own Kudos [?]: 7920 [1]
Given Kudos: 56
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: Even within the same study, people responded quite differently to [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
No, that proposed rule is not a thing. Here's an official example where the construction they're decrying is used correctly: https://gmatclub.com/forum/starfish-wit ... l#p1084777

As for D, it definitely won't fly. After "while," we need an action. We can't just say "while others not." Although "while" certainly does not always refer to two actual simultaneous actions--sometimes it just shows contrasting ideas--it is still used grammatically as if the two things described are both events.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 365
Own Kudos [?]: 43 [0]
Given Kudos: 529
Send PM
Re: Even within the same study, people responded quite differently to [#permalink]
(B) fails the ellipsis test, where as (D) looks like the most suitable?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Dec 2020
Posts: 71
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 279
Concentration: Technology, Statistics
WE:Analyst (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Even within the same study, people responded quite differently to [#permalink]
E might be the best of 5, but that isn't the best way to put it either.

E) Even within the same study, people responded quite differently to acupuncture with some showing increased flexibility and others not.

Using 'and' looks like a problem to me, especially with a comma after study.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Mar 2016
Posts: 191
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 101
Send PM
Re: Even within the same study, people responded quite differently to [#permalink]
Hi there, just to confirm my understanding on the usage of 'while' as a parallel marker.

please see the sentence below:

1) The opinions of politicians who are mostly guided by the vote bank while preparing their propaganda are no more relevant in this matter than those of the citizens who form most of that vote bank


a. Here 'while' is a conjunction joining two modifiers- a RPC and an ing verbal. Are these two parallel. It might be an exception. Just thinking if we also have an OG question on similar lines?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2017
Posts: 70
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 36
Send PM
Re: Even within the same study, people responded quite differently to [#permalink]
Hi,

When I open up ''show spoiler'' it gives me explanation on choice D.

saying that ''while'' usage is incorrect and a complete clause should have been there.

can't we say that option d] function as an absolute phrase and 'while' is just a preposition. Do we really need to look for a rule that 'while' begins a clause??
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17748
Own Kudos [?]: 878 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Even within the same study, people responded quite differently to [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Even within the same study, people responded quite differently to [#permalink]
   1   2   3 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7056 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts