I think we are entirely talking about a meaning and parallelism problem here. My logic in general:
(1) You cannot use the structure "some showing...others did not" as it is not parallel. Further, "showing" plays a slightly different role vs. what a verb would normally have. So IMO, you canno refer to the same action with any form of "do" after it. => (A), (B) and (C) are out.
(2) Additionally, in all the options without "with" you are basically left with a very complex sentence, in which the last part lacks a verb. I would therefore prefer answer choices that have "with" so that the logical connection between the two parts of the sentence is clearer. => (D) is out and we are left with
(E).
The only thing that still worries me a bit is the comma before the underlined part.
manugmat123
Even within the same study, people responded quite differently to acupuncture,
some showing increased flexibility, while others did not.a) some showing increased flexibility, while others did not.
b) with some showing increased flexibility, while others did not.
c) with some showing an increase in flexibility and others did not.
d) some showing an increase in flexibility, while others not.
e) with some showing increased flexibility and others not.