GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Jun 2019, 00:14

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Experiments designed to further our understanding of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: UWC
Joined: 09 May 2012
Posts: 360
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 620 Q42 V33
GMAT 2: 680 Q44 V38
GPA: 3.43
WE: Engineering (Entertainment and Sports)
Reviews Badge
Experiments designed to further our understanding of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2012, 01:02
1
13
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

61% (01:46) correct 39% (01:48) wrong based on 572 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning are not as applicable to "ball lightning" as they are to normal lightning, because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived.

A. Experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning are not as applicable to "ball lightning" as they are to normal lightning, because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived

B. Because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived, experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning are not as applicable to "ball lightning" as they are to normal lightning

C. Because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived, "ball lightning" cannot be studied by the same experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning as normal lightning

D. Because "ball lightning" is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived, experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning are not as applicable to it as they are to normal lightning

E. "Ball lightning" is not subject to experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning in the same way as normal lightning, because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: SLOGGING : My son says,This time Papa u will have to make it : Innocence is BLISS
Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 141
Location: India
WE: Sales (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Experiments designed to further our understanding of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2012, 05:15
2
Experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning are not as applicable to "ball lightning" as they are to normal lightning, because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived.

Thus the rduced stem :

EXPERIMENTS are not as applicable to Ball lighting as THEY are to Normal lighting, because IT is ...................

So THEY has a clear referrent = Experiments ,

But what does IT refer back to? ( Understanding the intent of the sentence gives the clue that IT should refer back to Ball Lighting ) ........... but the way IT has been placed creates ambiguity = Experiments or Ball lighting or Normal Lighting ( not clear )

Scanning of options :

A : wrong for IT ambiguity = Eliminated

B : IT (Sing) seems to wrongly modify / pounce on Experiments (plural) = Eliminated

C : Ball lighting cannot be studied by the same experiments as Normal lighting = Changes the meaning ( we don't know whether it can be studied or not = the case is of application ) = Eliminated

E : IT ambiguity apart from ..subject to experiments in the same way.......... = Eliminated

Left with D : because BL is so x, Y and Z.............., Experiments are not appliacble to IT (BL) as they are to NL = Perfect , clears the maze wrt ambiguity 7 has a logical flow.

Leading to D = my take
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Aug 2013
Posts: 89
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Experiments designed to further our understanding of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Nov 2014, 16:55
1
2
I will go with D here.

A)Use of it is ambiguos as its antecedant is not clear

B)Modifier error-Wrongly modifying experiments instead of lightning
Because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived, experiments designed

C)Because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived, “ball lightning” cannot be studied by the same experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning as normal lightning. is awkward so it is out as well

D) Correct

E) Use of it is ambiguos plus there Comparison error as well
Ball lightning” is not subject to experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning in the same way as normal lightning,because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived.

Thanks
AK
Dont forget to give Kudos if explanation makes sense to you :-D
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2013
Posts: 8
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Experiments designed to further our understanding of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 14 Nov 2014, 09:16
A ambiguous - incorrect
B 1st clause incorrectly modifying "experiments" .. - Incorrect
C incorrectly suggests - experiments studied ball lightning .. & ... understanding = normal lightning
E wordy - awkward incorrect

D
_________________
“It’s not that I’m so smart; it’s just that I stay with problems longer.” - Albert Einstein
"Kirib chiqma, bilib chiq."
"Век живи́ - век учи́сь."

Originally posted by hamdam on 13 Nov 2014, 19:27.
Last edited by hamdam on 14 Nov 2014, 09:16, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Feb 2013
Posts: 7
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Experiments designed to further our understanding of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Nov 2014, 08:18
1
IMO D,

Question Stem :Experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning are not as applicable to “ball lightning” as they are to normal lightning, because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived.

Meaning of Author : Experiments designed blah blah are not as applicable to "ball lightning" as they are to normal lightning.
Because ball lightening is something blah blah blah.

Option A : because it is so rare ... , " It " dosen't have any clear antecedent. So, Incorrect.
Option B : because it is so rare... modifies experiments instead of "ball lightening" . So, Incorrect.
Option C : because it is so rare..correctly modifies "ball lightening" but "....further our understanding of lightning as normal lightning." distorts the actual intended meaning.
Option D: Correct Answer . The meaning is clear and it says "Because "ball xxx" is blah blah, experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning are not as applicable to it as they are to normal lightning". Correct usage of Idion "as applicable..as".
Option E: Unclear usage of "it". " “Ball lightning” is not subject to experiments...." is wordy.

Regards,
Swaroop
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 17 Oct 2016
Posts: 317
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GPA: 3.73
WE: Design (Real Estate)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Experiments designed to further our understanding of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jan 2018, 22:32
A- The pronoun "it” is not having a proper antecedent-OUT
B- the Modifier that starts with "Because" modifies Experiments wrongly-OUT
C- No antecedent for "it”-OUT
D- keep this. No error.
E- again unclear antecedent for "it"-OUT

Hence D
_________________
Help with kudos if u found the post useful. Thanks
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1211
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Experiments designed to further our understanding of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jan 2018, 14:34
Experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning are not as applicable to "ball lightning" as they are to normal lightning, because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived.

A. Experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning are not as applicable to "ball lightning" as they are to normal lightning, because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived -no antecedent for "it"
B. Because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived, experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning are not as applicable to "ball lightning" as they are to normal lightning -Incorrect modifier
C. Because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived, "ball lightning" cannot be studied by the same experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning as normal lightning -lighting as normal is incorrect
D. Because "ball lightning" is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived, experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning are not as applicable to it as they are to normal lightning -CORRECT
E. "Ball lightning" is not subject to experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning in the same way as normal lightning, because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived -no antecedent for "it"
_________________
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 26 Jun 2017
Posts: 407
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
WE: Information Technology (Other)
Re: Experiments designed to further our understanding of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Sep 2018, 13:23
Experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning are not as applicable to “ball lightning” as they are to normal lightning, because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived.


A. Experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning are not as applicable to “ball lightning” as they are to normal lightning, because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived.
"it" - is not clear here ---> out
B. Because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived, experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning are not as applicable to “ball lightning” as they are to normal lightning.
Sounds like experiments are rare and in this case SV agreement ---> out
C. Because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived, “ball lightning” cannot be studied by the same experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning as normal lightning.
The end of the sentence does not make sense
D. Because “ball lightning” is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived, experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning are not as applicable to it as they are to normal lightning.
Good
E. “Ball lightning” is not subject to experiments designed to further our understanding of lightning in the same way as normal lightning, because it is so rare, unpredictable, and short-lived.
The whole second half does not make sense ---> out
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 07 May 2018
Posts: 34
GMAT 1: 560 Q43 V25
CAT Tests
Re: Experiments designed to further our understanding of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jan 2019, 04:42
I think this question is a classic example of "making a sentence tough" by using modifiers. Because when i first read it and found the error, it took me a lot of time to find out the correct pronoun usage among all the options,but when i just hide the modifier, it takes very less time to find the correct pronoun usage in the options.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Experiments designed to further our understanding of   [#permalink] 31 Jan 2019, 04:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Experiments designed to further our understanding of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne