Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Finally reaching a decision on an issue that has long been politically [#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Feb 2008, 12:07
5
8
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
25% (medium)
Question Stats:
73% (00:38) correct 27% (00:49) wrong based on 651 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Finally reaching a decision on an issue that has long been politically charged in the Pacific Northwest, politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, instead of which they proposed a series of smaller steps, by which they intend to protect the fish.
A. politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, instead of which they proposed a series of smaller steps, by which they intend
B. politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, proposing instead a series of smaller steps intended
C. politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan for protecting wild salmon and other endangered fish, and instead they proposed a series of smaller steps, intending
D. an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish was postponed by politicians, who instead proposed a series of smaller steps, intending
E. an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish has been postponed by politicians, proposing instead a series of smaller steps intended
Re: Finally reaching a decision on an issue that has long been politically [#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Feb 2008, 12:15
B is my answer.
A. politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, instead of which they proposed a series of smaller steps, by which they intend This is just nuts B. politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, proposing instead a series of smaller steps intended. C. politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan for protecting wild salmon and other endangered fish, and instead they proposed a series of smaller steps, intending. 2nd place...I believe it's just idiomatic to say an ambitious plan "to protect"; the other differences from B aren't as suspicious to me except that they are wordier. D. an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish was postponed by politicians, who instead proposed a series of smaller steps, intending. Politicians reached the decision E. an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish has been postponed by politicians, proposing instead a series of smaller steps intended. Politicians reached the decision _________________
Re: Finally reaching a decision on an issue that has long been politically [#permalink]
Show Tags
24 May 2014, 23:43
9
1
ConnectTheDots wrote:
Could someone help B Vs C ??
GMAT Prep Exam pack 1. OA: B
There would be idiomatic preference for "to protect" over "for protecting". There is also a subtle but material meaning difference between B & C with the difference between the modifiers "intended" and "intending".
In B, the sentence reads "a series of smaller steps intended to protect the fish". It's evident that the steps are what is intended to protect the fish. In C, the sentence reads "a series of smaller steps, intending to protect the fish". Using the participle form, "intending", after a comma changes the way the modifier works. Instead of simply modifying steps, now "intending" is modifying the preceding clauses, implying that the politicians both proposed the smaller steps AND postponed an ambitious plan in an attempt to protect the fish. This doesn't make sense because delaying the ambitious plan does not protect the fish.
Watch out for how changing modifiers change the meaning of the sentence.
Re: Finally reaching a decision on an issue that has long been politically [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jun 2014, 04:35
KyleWiddison wrote:
ConnectTheDots wrote:
Could someone help B Vs C ??
GMAT Prep Exam pack 1. OA: B
There would be idiomatic preference for "to protect" over "for protecting". There is also a subtle but material meaning difference between B & C with the difference between the modifiers "intended" and "intending".
In B, the sentence reads "a series of smaller steps intended to protect the fish". It's evident that the steps are what is intended to protect the fish. In C, the sentence reads "a series of smaller steps, intending to protect the fish". Using the participle form, "intending", after a comma changes the way the modifier works. Instead of simply modifying steps, now "intending" is modifying the preceding clauses, implying that the politicians both proposed the smaller steps AND postponed an ambitious plan in an attempt to protect the fish. This doesn't make sense because delaying the ambitious plan does not protect the fish.
Watch out for how changing modifiers change the meaning of the sentence.
KW
But per the original sentence politicians are the ones who intend.
Finally reaching a decision on an issue that has long been politically charged in the Pacific Northwest, politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, instead of which they proposed a series of smaller steps, by which they intend to protect the fish.
A. politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, instead of which they proposed a series of smaller steps, by which they intend B. politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, proposing instead a series of smaller steps intended. C. politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan for protecting wild salmon and other endangered fish, and instead they proposed a series of smaller steps, intending.
I don't see any other problem with (C) except 'for protecting'.
Per the original sentence also 'they proposed a series of smaller steps, by which they intend'
Also in (C),
they proposed a series of smaller steps, intending.
Verb-Ing correctly modifies previous clause and makes sense with the subject of the preceding clause.
Any suggestions?
_________________
Rgds, TGC! _____________________________________________________________________ I Assisted You => KUDOS Please _____________________________________________________________________________
Re: Finally reaching a decision on an issue that has long been politically [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jun 2014, 10:53
TGC wrote:
KyleWiddison wrote:
ConnectTheDots wrote:
Could someone help B Vs C ??
GMAT Prep Exam pack 1. OA: B
There would be idiomatic preference for "to protect" over "for protecting". There is also a subtle but material meaning difference between B & C with the difference between the modifiers "intended" and "intending".
In B, the sentence reads "a series of smaller steps intended to protect the fish". It's evident that the steps are what is intended to protect the fish. In C, the sentence reads "a series of smaller steps, intending to protect the fish". Using the participle form, "intending", after a comma changes the way the modifier works. Instead of simply modifying steps, now "intending" is modifying the preceding clauses, implying that the politicians both proposed the smaller steps AND postponed an ambitious plan in an attempt to protect the fish. This doesn't make sense because delaying the ambitious plan does not protect the fish.
Watch out for how changing modifiers change the meaning of the sentence.
KW
But per the original sentence politicians are the ones who intend.
Finally reaching a decision on an issue that has long been politically charged in the Pacific Northwest, politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, instead of which they proposed a series of smaller steps, by which they intend to protect the fish.
A. politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, instead of which they proposed a series of smaller steps, by which they intend B. politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, proposing instead a series of smaller steps intended. C. politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan for protecting wild salmon and other endangered fish, and instead they proposed a series of smaller steps, intending.
I don't see any other problem with (C) except 'for protecting'.
Per the original sentence also 'they proposed a series of smaller steps, by which they intend'
Also in (C),
they proposed a series of smaller steps, intending.
Verb-Ing correctly modifies previous clause and makes sense with the subject of the preceding clause.
Any suggestions?
OK - a few points to discuss here. First of all, answer choice A does not necessarily reflect the intended meaning of the sentence - it is simply one of the answer choices - so we can't use underlined portions of the original to determine proper meaning.
Second, using the -ing modifier shifts the role of the politicians within the answer choice. Earlier the politicians are the agents who have to decide about a plan that would protect fish but later the politicians take a direct role in protecting fish and the steps are de-emphasized. You will notice in B that the plan is designed to protect and the steps are intended to protect. The structure in B makes much more sense.
Beyond the meaning issues in C, there is the issue with "for protecting" and I don't like the use of the comma before and.
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4345
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Finally reaching a decision on an issue that has long been politically [#permalink]
Show Tags
06 May 2017, 02:27
Top Contributor
The point here is to decide what really is intended to protect the fish B says that it is the small steps that are intended to protect. This is forthright and touching the nose from the front. C says that it is the politicians' proposing of small steps that are intended to protect. This is indirect and touching the nose from behind. The entire canvas has changed in C due to a changed change of a word. Therefore, B is a better fit.
_________________
you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote No one knows this better than a GMAT student does. Narendran +9198845 44509
Re: Finally reaching a decision on an issue that has long been politically [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Aug 2017, 23:07
1
This is primarily a modifier question. The original structure of the sentence is as follows: Finally reaching a decision..., politicians decided to do X, instead of which they proposed Y, by which they intend to do Z. The last modifier, "instead of ..." is incorrect. A better structure would be, "Finally reaching a decision..., politicians decided to do X, proposing instead Y intended to do Z. Choice (B) fixes it with the correct structure. Choice (C) is incorrect because it introduces "and instead", which is less precise and inconsistent with the author's original intent. Choice (D) and (E) both suffer from an error in the first modifier, suggesting that "an ambitious plan" is what finally reached a decision.
_________________
Thanks & Regards, Anaira Mitch
gmatclubot
Re: Finally reaching a decision on an issue that has long been politically
[#permalink]
09 Aug 2017, 23:07
We’re rolling out updates to our privacy features and policies in the coming weeks. You’ll have more control over your personal information and more detail on what information we...
The scale and depth of opportunities presented by the quickly evolving digital entertainment industry in India is astounding. India is an ideal market for new digital entrants. With a...
The scale and depth of opportunities presented by the quickly evolving digital entertainment industry in India is astounding. India is an ideal market for new digital entrants. With a...
close
73% (00:38) correct 
