Last visit was: 11 Dec 2024, 05:45 It is currently 11 Dec 2024, 05:45
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
655-705 Level|   Weaken|         
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,141
Own Kudos:
6,607
 [35]
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,141
Kudos: 6,607
 [35]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
28
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 11 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,803
Own Kudos:
685,030
 [1]
Given Kudos: 88,240
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,803
Kudos: 685,030
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
saicharan1191
Joined: 21 Jun 2014
Last visit: 18 Nov 2023
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
10
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 55
Kudos: 10
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
kunalsinghNS
Joined: 14 Sep 2016
Last visit: 23 Mar 2022
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
32
 [1]
Given Kudos: 39
Posts: 103
Kudos: 32
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We need to find an argument that weakens the conclusion - "It is clear, therefore, that during these past 5 years, CXC has increased in virulence."

(A) Many recent cattle deaths that have actually been caused by CXC have been mistakenly attributed to another disease that mimics the symptoms of CXC. - If we correct the mistake in this argument then we can see that CXC actually increases the number of deaths. hence, its a strengthener

(B) During the first North American outbreak of the disease, many of the deaths reported to have been caused by CXC were actually due to other causes. - This option talks about the death caused by CXC but we dont know the size of the infected population

(C) An inoculation program against CXC was recently begun after controlled studies snowed inoculation to be 70 percent effective in preventing serious cases of the illness. - Irrelevant

(D) Since the first outbreak, farmers have learned to treat mild cases of CXC and no longer report them to veterinarians or authorities. - If the famers dont report the mild cases whereas the severe ones causes the same amount of deaths. This leads to a fall in total number of reported cases. hence, Correct.

(E) Cattle that have contracted and survived CXC rarely contract the disease a second time. - Irrelevant
User avatar
srikanth9502
Joined: 27 Jan 2016
Last visit: 06 Dec 2017
Posts: 100
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 124
Schools: ISB '18
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Schools: ISB '18
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 100
Kudos: 297
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Suppose, a total of 100 hundred cattle were effected by CXC during its initial outbreak and 5 of them died. In this case the death percentage is 5%

After 5 years even if 100 cattle are effected by the disease and if only 70 are reported to the authorities because the balance 30 had mild syptoms of the disease. Now even if the same number i.e 5 cattle die, the death rate increases as the total number of only 70 cattle are taken into consideration to calculate the death rate.

This weakens the argument's conclusion that the disease has grown in virulence.
User avatar
udaypratapsingh99
Joined: 12 Jan 2019
Last visit: 02 Dec 2024
Posts: 401
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 372
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
broall
Five years ago, during the first North American outbreak of the cattle disease CXC, the death rate from the disease was 5 percent of all reported cases, whereas today the corresponding figure is over 18 percent. It is clear, therefore, that during these past 5 years, CXC has increased in virulence.

Which one of the following, if true, most substantially weakens the argument?

(A) Many recent cattle deaths that have actually been caused by CXC have been mistakenly attributed to another disease that mimics the symptoms of CXC.

(B) During the first North American outbreak of the disease, many of the deaths reported to have been caused by CXC were actually due to other causes.

(C) An inoculation program against CXC was recently begun after controlled studies snowed inoculation to be 70 percent effective in preventing serious cases of the illness.

(D) Since the first outbreak, farmers have learned to treat mild cases of CXC and no longer report them to veterinarians or authorities.

(E) Cattle that have contracted and survived CXC rarely contract the disease a second time.

Source: LSAT


if in first outbreak no. of cases were 5000 and all were reported then actual death were 250(5% of 5000)
and if suppose 360 deaths happened in recent outbreaks out of 2000 reported cases then indeed % of deaths > then 1st outbreak, however if another 2000 cases, which are not reported as said by option D then the figure would have been 9% , a figure lower then prev.
Hence option D weakens it
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 11 Dec 2024
Posts: 2,741
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 764
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,741
Kudos: 2,008
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Five years ago, during the first North American outbreak of the cattle disease CXC, the death rate from the disease was 5 percent of all reported cases, whereas today the corresponding figure is over 18 percent. It is clear, therefore, that during these past 5 years, CXC has increased in virulence.

Which one of the following, if true, most substantially weakens the argument?

(A) Many recent cattle deaths that have actually been caused by CXC have been mistakenly attributed to another disease that mimics the symptoms of CXC. - WRONG. Changes the perspective of passage altogether. 

(B) During the first North American outbreak of the disease, many of the deaths reported to have been caused by CXC were actually due to other causes. - WRONG. Out of scope.  

(C) An inoculation program against CXC was recently begun after controlled studies snowed inoculation to be 70 percent effective in preventing serious cases of the illness. - WRONG. Irrelevant.

(D) Since the first outbreak, farmers have learned to treat mild cases of CXC and no longer report them to veterinarians or authorities. - CORRECT. If reporting gets less then percentage of death increase. Thus, virulence is actually unchanged almost.

(E) Cattle that have contracted and survived CXC rarely contract the disease a second time. - WRONG. Goes against the conclusion. What about the deaths?

Answer D.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7153 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts