Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 23 Sep 2013, 06:02
18
56
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
25% (medium)
Question Stats:
77% (01:08) correct 23% (01:22) wrong based on 823 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square layers. Each layer consists of cubic boxes arranged in rows that form a square, and each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it. If the bottom of the layer has 81 boxes and the top of the layer has only 1 box, how many boxes are in display?
For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Sep 2013, 06:23
36
31
imhimanshu wrote:
For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square layers. Each layer consists of cubic boxes arranged in rows that form a square, and each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it. If the bottom of the layer has 81 boxes and the top of the layer has only 1 box, how many boxes are in display?
A. 236 B. 260 C. 269 D. 276 E. 285
Basically we have a 9-layer pyramid as shown below:
(Actually this pyramid 8-layer, couldn't find 9-layer one image)
The number of boxes would be: \(9^2 + 8^2 + 7^2 + 6^2 + 5^2 + 4^2 + 3^2 + 2^2 + 1 = 285\).
You can use the sum of the first n perfect squares formula to calculate: \(\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}=\frac{9*(9+1)(2*9+1)}{6}=285\).
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Sep 2013, 14:46
3
Thanks bunuel but how did you manage to understand that? I read the question again and cannot imagine the picture you uploaded in my head at all. Thanks! _________________
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Sep 2013, 00:56
24
1
roygush wrote:
Thanks bunuel but how did you manage to understand that? I read the question again and cannot imagine the picture you uploaded in my head at all. Thanks!
I read the stem carefully. We are told that: Cubic boxes are stacked in square layers --> each layer is a square; The bottom of the layer has 81 boxes --> the bottom layer has 9 rows and each row has 9 boxes. Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it --> the second layer has 8 rows and each row has 8 boxes. ...
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Sep 2013, 08:58
2
Bunuel wrote:
roygush wrote:
Thanks bunuel but how did you manage to understand that? I read the question again and cannot imagine the picture you uploaded in my head at all. Thanks!
I read the stem carefully. We are told that: Cubic boxes are stacked in square layers --> each layer is a square; The bottom of the layer has 81 boxes --> the bottom layer has 9 rows and each row has 9 boxes. Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it --> the second layer has 8 rows and each row has 8 boxes. ...
Hope it helps.
I got confused (and I still am) by the line which says "Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it"
I got that the bottom layer will have 9 x 9 boxes I also understand that the next level up will have 8 rows of boxes and since this layer also has to form a square hence it needs 8 boxes in the column as well.
What is elusive for me is "and 1 fewer box in each remaining row[/color] than the layer directly below it". Can you please explain again.
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Sep 2013, 15:04
3
violetsplash wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
roygush wrote:
Thanks bunuel but how did you manage to understand that? I read the question again and cannot imagine the picture you uploaded in my head at all. Thanks!
I read the stem carefully. We are told that: Cubic boxes are stacked in square layers --> each layer is a square; The bottom of the layer has 81 boxes --> the bottom layer has 9 rows and each row has 9 boxes. Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it --> the second layer has 8 rows and each row has 8 boxes. ...
Hope it helps.
I got confused (and I still am) by the line which says "Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it"
I got that the bottom layer will have 9 x 9 boxes I also understand that the next level up will have 8 rows of boxes and since this layer also has to form a square hence it needs 8 boxes in the column as well.
What is elusive for me is "and 1 fewer box in each remaining row[/color] than the layer directly below it". Can you please explain again.
Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it:
1st layer has 9 rows and 9 boxes in each of them. 2nd row has 1 fewer, so 8 rows and each of the remaining 8 rows has 1 fewer box, so 8 boxes in it.
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Apr 2015, 17:42
Bunuel wrote:
imhimanshu wrote:
For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square layers. Each layer consists of cubic boxes arranged in rows that form a square, and each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it. If the bottom of the layer has 81 boxes and the top of the layer has only 1 box, how many boxes are in display?
A. 236 B. 260 C. 269 D. 276 E. 285
Basically we have a 9-layer pyramid as shown below:
Attachment:
pyramid_with_corner_cube_from_istock.jpg
(Actually this pyramid 8-layer, couldn't find 9-layer one image)
The number of boxes would be: 9^2 + 8^2 + 7^2 + 6^2 + 5^2 + 4^2 + 3^2 + 2^2 + 1 = 285.
You can use the sum of the first n perfect squares formula to calculate: \(\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}=\frac{9*(9+1)(2*9+1)}{6}=285\).
Answer: E.
Hope it's clear.
Is there any chance you can apply why that 6 is there? I want to make sure I can apply this formula in more complicated cases.
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Oct 2015, 19:42
Here's where non-native speakers could have trouble. By display I kept thinking of a computer display and I tried to visualize boxes arranged within the TV, and jumped into the conclusion that this was similar to a problem in the OG (13th Ed. PS 124). Now, if you don't know the formula for the sum of the first n perfect squares (I actually forgot it on a second attempt), it is just nonsense to sum each square result. plaverbach's approach is the appropriate one. After taking a look at the answers and noticing that only two of them have the same units number, you pray that those are wrong and go ahead and find that unit.
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Jan 2016, 10:17
I liked plaverbach approach, as I couldn't understand the question in the first place and choose random wrong answer. But when I saw the picture posted, I could use the plaverbach approach.
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Aug 2016, 13:01
Attachment:
File comment: Visualize the Question this Way IMG_20160830_012335.jpg [ 1.04 MiB | Viewed 23118 times ]
In the above figures ,small circles are akin to cubic boxes and lines are rows. So bottom most layer has 9*9 = 81 boxes . Now this figure has more layers stacked on top of it and each layer has 1 less box(small circle) and 1 less row( line). If you follow this theory then you will notice that no of rows = no of boxes in each row.
So 2nd layer from the top will have 2 rows with 2 boxes each. Similarly top most layer will have 1 row and 1 box.
So the total no of boxes will be : 9* 9 + 8*8 +.....+ 1*1 = 285 .
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square layers [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Jan 2017, 19:39
1
ashikaverma13 wrote:
For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square layers. Each layer consists of cubic boxes arranged in rows that form a square, and each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it. If the bottom layer has 21 boxes and the top layer has only 1 box, how many boxes are in the display?
A. 236 B. 260 C. 269 D. 276 E. 285
Hi, The Q seems to be flawed as 21 cannot be the number of boxes . It is either 81 or 25.
You can imagine this as a huge cube from which steps are made in 2 sides by removing a row of boxes in each layer. In numerical value,all the layers will be square of integers starting from 1 on top to 5 or 9 in lowermost.
When we add these, it becomes \(1^2+2^2+3^2+4^2+5^2+6^2+7^2+8^2+9^2\) Either add all of them or use formula SUM=\(\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}\)=9*(9+1)*(2*9+1)/6=9*10*19/6=15*19=285 E
_________________
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Jul 2017, 06:57
1
Yeah i thought from each square floor, one block is removed. solved like- 9^2 -1 + 8^2 -1 + .... + 2^2 -1 + 1 ( since it is said from below floor one block is removed) . And perplexed over where is the answer. Now i understood what does it mean. It simply means a square box is missing from row in each subsequent floor.
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Feb 2018, 11:03
As we know the series is 9^2+8^2.....+2^2+1 we know there are 5 odd+4 even=odd hence striking off Answer choices A,B,and D now we can sum only the unit digits of the squares 1+4+9+6+5+6+9+4+1=X5 hence answer choice ending with 5 is the Answer
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Mar 2018, 16:06
2
Hi All,
The math behind this question is not difficult - it's just about adding the perfect squares from 1^2 to 9^2, inclusive. While it might take a little time to "visualize" what this question describes, the actual "work" is not too challenging. If a child can do the math, then you should be able to (and faster).
There is an interesting shortcut built into the math though. From the answer choices, you'll notice that almost all of the units digits are unique (6, 0, 9 and 5). This provides a likely shortcut that can help us to avoid a bit of the math.
1 4 9 16 25 36 49 64 81 --- ?
The nine numbers above can be "paired up" to create 4 values that end in a 0: 1+ 9 --> ends in 0 4 + 16 --> ends in 0 36 + 64 --> ends in 0 49 + 81 --> ends in 0 and 25
The sum MUST end in a 5 and there's only one answer that matches…
Or you can just multiply the units of the numbers and add them all together you will get a result of 5. The only answer ending in 5 is the correct one _________________
lets all unite to reach our target together
gmatclubot
For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
22 Mar 2018, 09:55
close
77% (01:08) correct 
