Last visit was: 03 Aug 2024, 20:02 It is currently 03 Aug 2024, 20:02
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 222
Own Kudos [?]: 5376 [230]
Given Kudos: 136
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94778
Own Kudos [?]: 646411 [139]
Given Kudos: 86853
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94778
Own Kudos [?]: 646411 [57]
Given Kudos: 86853
Retired Moderator
Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Status:Studying for the GMAT
Posts: 219
Own Kudos [?]: 490 [31]
Given Kudos: 251
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V40
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41 (Online)
WE:Business Development (Venture Capital)
For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
22
Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Easy calculation:

1) Sum the UNIT digits.
1 + 4 + 9 + 16 + 25 +36+ 49+ 64 +81

2) Agrupate in 10's
1+9
4+6
6+4
9+1
5+ ___

The unit digit must be 5, therefore the correct answer is E.

Originally posted by plaverbach on 28 Jul 2014, 12:55.
Last edited by plaverbach on 06 Oct 2020, 13:26, edited 3 times in total.
General Discussion
Manager
Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Posts: 113
Own Kudos [?]: 665 [7]
Given Kudos: 19
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
7
Kudos
Thanks bunuel but how did you manage to understand that?
I read the question again and cannot imagine the picture you uploaded in my head at all.
Thanks!
Intern
Joined: 24 Jan 2012
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 991 [2]
Given Kudos: 3
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Bunuel wrote:
roygush wrote:
Thanks bunuel but how did you manage to understand that?
I read the question again and cannot imagine the picture you uploaded in my head at all.
Thanks!

I read the stem carefully. We are told that:
Cubic boxes are stacked in square layers --> each layer is a square;
The bottom of the layer has 81 boxes --> the bottom layer has 9 rows and each row has 9 boxes.
Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it --> the second layer has 8 rows and each row has 8 boxes.
...

Hope it helps.

I got confused (and I still am) by the line which says "Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it"

I got that the bottom layer will have 9 x 9 boxes
I also understand that the next level up will have 8 rows of boxes and since this layer also has to form a square hence it needs 8 boxes in the column as well.

What is elusive for me is "and 1 fewer box in each remaining row[/color] than the layer directly below it". Can you please explain again.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94778
Own Kudos [?]: 646411 [8]
Given Kudos: 86853
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
8
Kudos
violetsplash wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
roygush wrote:
Thanks bunuel but how did you manage to understand that?
I read the question again and cannot imagine the picture you uploaded in my head at all.
Thanks!

I read the stem carefully. We are told that:
Cubic boxes are stacked in square layers --> each layer is a square;
The bottom of the layer has 81 boxes --> the bottom layer has 9 rows and each row has 9 boxes.
Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it --> the second layer has 8 rows and each row has 8 boxes.
...

Hope it helps.

I got confused (and I still am) by the line which says "Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it"

I got that the bottom layer will have 9 x 9 boxes
I also understand that the next level up will have 8 rows of boxes and since this layer also has to form a square hence it needs 8 boxes in the column as well.

What is elusive for me is "and 1 fewer box in each remaining row[/color] than the layer directly below it". Can you please explain again.

Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it:

1st layer has 9 rows and 9 boxes in each of them. 2nd row has 1 fewer, so 8 rows and each of the remaining 8 rows has 1 fewer box, so 8 boxes in it.

Hope it's clear.
Manager
Joined: 14 Jan 2013
Posts: 114
Own Kudos [?]: 1555 [0]
Given Kudos: 30
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT Date: 08-01-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
Bunuel,

Do you have more examples like these questions? I am finding it difficult to understand after reading question.

Thanks

~M14
Intern
Joined: 20 Oct 2013
Posts: 37
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 27
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
superb explanation Bunnel! i couldnt understand the qs...
Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2012
Posts: 244
Own Kudos [?]: 796 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Weight: 170lbs
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
WE:Analyst (Other)
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
imhimanshu wrote:
For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square layers. Each layer consists of cubic boxes arranged in rows that form a square, and each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it. If the bottom of the layer has 81 boxes and the top of the layer has only 1 box, how many boxes are in display?

A. 236
B. 260
C. 269
D. 276
E. 285

Basically we have a 9-layer pyramid as shown below:
Attachment:
pyramid_with_corner_cube_from_istock.jpg
(Actually this pyramid 8-layer, couldn't find 9-layer one image)

The number of boxes would be: 9^2 + 8^2 + 7^2 + 6^2 + 5^2 + 4^2 + 3^2 + 2^2 + 1 = 285.

You can use the sum of the first n perfect squares formula to calculate: $$\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}=\frac{9*(9+1)(2*9+1)}{6}=285$$.

Hope it's clear.

Is there any chance you can apply why that 6 is there? I want to make sure I can apply this formula in more complicated cases.
Intern
Joined: 26 Jul 2014
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
Here's where non-native speakers could have trouble. By display I kept thinking of a computer display and I tried to visualize boxes arranged within the TV, and jumped into the conclusion that this was similar to a problem in the OG (13th Ed. PS 124).
Now, if you don't know the formula for the sum of the first n perfect squares (I actually forgot it on a second attempt), it is just nonsense to sum each square result. plaverbach's approach is the appropriate one. After taking a look at the answers and noticing that only two of them have the same units number, you pray that those are wrong and go ahead and find that unit.
Intern
Joined: 12 Nov 2014
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 44 [0]
Given Kudos: 923
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
I liked plaverbach approach, as I couldn't understand the question in the first place and choose random wrong answer.
But when I saw the picture posted, I could use the plaverbach approach.
Intern
Joined: 26 May 2014
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 556 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
Attachment:
File comment: Visualize the Question this Way

IMG_20160830_012335.jpg [ 1.04 MiB | Viewed 75218 times ]

In the above figures ,small circles are akin to cubic boxes and lines are rows. So bottom most layer has 9*9 = 81 boxes . Now this figure has more layers stacked on top of it and each layer has 1 less box(small circle) and 1 less row( line). If you follow this theory then you will notice that no of rows = no of boxes in each row.

So 2nd layer from the top will have 2 rows with 2 boxes each. Similarly top most layer will have 1 row and 1 box.

So the total no of boxes will be : 9* 9 + 8*8 +.....+ 1*1 = 285 .
Intern
Joined: 10 Aug 2016
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [9]
Given Kudos: 22
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
9
Kudos
possibly the worst worded question i've ever read
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11504
Own Kudos [?]: 34858 [1]
Given Kudos: 329
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square layers [#permalink]
1
Kudos
ashikaverma13 wrote:
For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square layers. Each layer consists of cubic boxes arranged in rows that form a square, and each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it. If the bottom layer has 21 boxes and the top layer has only 1 box, how many boxes are in the display?

A. 236
B. 260
C. 269
D. 276
E. 285

Hi,
The Q seems to be flawed as 21 cannot be the number of boxes . It is either 81 or 25.

You can imagine this as a huge cube from which steps are made in 2 sides by removing a row of boxes in each layer.
In numerical value,all the layers will be square of integers starting from 1 on top to 5 or 9 in lowermost.

When we add these, it becomes $$1^2+2^2+3^2+4^2+5^2+6^2+7^2+8^2+9^2$$
Either add all of them or use formula
SUM=$$\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}$$=9*(9+1)*(2*9+1)/6=9*10*19/6=15*19=285
E
Intern
Joined: 07 Dec 2016
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 556 [1]
Given Kudos: 29
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
1
Kudos
I had a tough time understanding the question as well
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 446
Own Kudos [?]: 403 [1]
Given Kudos: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Yeah i thought from each square floor, one block is removed.
solved like-
9^2 -1 + 8^2 -1 + .... + 2^2 -1 + 1 ( since it is said from below floor one block is removed) .
And perplexed over where is the answer.
Now i understood what does it mean. It simply means a square box is missing from row in each subsequent floor.
Intern
Joined: 15 May 2017
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 170
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
As we know the series is 9^2+8^2.....+2^2+1
we know there are 5 odd+4 even=odd hence striking off Answer choices A,B,and D now we can sum only the unit digits of the squares
1+4+9+6+5+6+9+4+1=X5 hence answer choice ending with 5 is the Answer

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Posts: 21835
Own Kudos [?]: 11812 [4]
Given Kudos: 450
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Hi All,

The math behind this question is not difficult - it's just about adding the perfect squares from 1^2 to 9^2, inclusive. While it might take a little time to "visualize" what this question describes, the actual "work" is not too challenging. If a child can do the math, then you should be able to (and faster).

There is an interesting shortcut built into the math though. From the answer choices, you'll notice that almost all of the units digits are unique (6, 0, 9 and 5). This provides a likely shortcut that can help us to avoid a bit of the math.

1
4
9
16
25
36
49
64
81
---
?

The nine numbers above can be "paired up" to create 4 values that end in a 0:
1+ 9 --> ends in 0
4 + 16 --> ends in 0
36 + 64 --> ends in 0
49 + 81 --> ends in 0
and 25

The sum MUST end in a 5 and there's only one answer that matches…

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2016
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 113 [1]
Given Kudos: 184
For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Bunuel wrote:

You can use the sum of the first n perfect squares formula to calculate: $$\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}=\frac{9*(9+1)(2*9+1)}{6}=285$$.