Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 246

For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 23 Sep 2013, 06:02
Question Stats:
75% (02:09) correct 25% (02:21) wrong based on 664 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square layers. Each layer consists of cubic boxes arranged in rows that form a square, and each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it. If the bottom of the layer has 81 boxes and the top of the layer has only 1 box, how many boxes are in display? A. 236 B. 260 C. 269 D. 276 E. 285
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
Originally posted by imhimanshu on 23 Sep 2013, 05:10.
Last edited by Bunuel on 23 Sep 2013, 06:02, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59561

For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Sep 2013, 06:23
imhimanshu wrote: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square layers. Each layer consists of cubic boxes arranged in rows that form a square, and each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it. If the bottom of the layer has 81 boxes and the top of the layer has only 1 box, how many boxes are in display?
A. 236 B. 260 C. 269 D. 276 E. 285 Basically we have a 9layer pyramid as shown below: (Actually this pyramid 8layer, couldn't find 9layer one image)The number of boxes would be: \(9^2 + 8^2 + 7^2 + 6^2 + 5^2 + 4^2 + 3^2 + 2^2 + 1 = 285\). You can use the sum of the first n perfect squares formula to calculate: \(\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}=\frac{9*(9+1)(2*9+1)}{6}=285\). Answer: E. Hope it's clear. Attachment:
pyramid_with_corner_cube_from_istock.jpg [ 9.94 KiB  Viewed 61594 times ]




Intern
Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Posts: 29

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jul 2014, 12:55
Easy calculation:
1) Sum the UNIT digits. 1 + 4 + 9 + 16 + 25 +36+ 49+ 64 +81
2) Agrupate in 10's 1+9 4+6 6+4 9+1 5+ ....
The unit digit must be 5, therefore the correct answer is E.




Manager
Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Posts: 114

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Sep 2013, 14:46
Thanks bunuel but how did you manage to understand that? I read the question again and cannot imagine the picture you uploaded in my head at all. Thanks!



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59561

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Sep 2013, 00:56
roygush wrote: Thanks bunuel but how did you manage to understand that? I read the question again and cannot imagine the picture you uploaded in my head at all. Thanks! I read the stem carefully. We are told that: Cubic boxes are stacked in square layers > each layer is a square; The bottom of the layer has 81 boxes > the bottom layer has 9 rows and each row has 9 boxes. Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it > the second layer has 8 rows and each row has 8 boxes. ... Hope it helps.



Intern
Joined: 24 Jan 2012
Posts: 9

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Sep 2013, 08:58
Bunuel wrote: roygush wrote: Thanks bunuel but how did you manage to understand that? I read the question again and cannot imagine the picture you uploaded in my head at all. Thanks! I read the stem carefully. We are told that: Cubic boxes are stacked in square layers > each layer is a square; The bottom of the layer has 81 boxes > the bottom layer has 9 rows and each row has 9 boxes. Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it > the second layer has 8 rows and each row has 8 boxes. ... Hope it helps. I got confused (and I still am) by the line which says "Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it" I got that the bottom layer will have 9 x 9 boxes I also understand that the next level up will have 8 rows of boxes and since this layer also has to form a square hence it needs 8 boxes in the column as well. What is elusive for me is "and 1 fewer box in each remaining row[/color] than the layer directly below it". Can you please explain again.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59561

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Sep 2013, 15:04
violetsplash wrote: Bunuel wrote: roygush wrote: Thanks bunuel but how did you manage to understand that? I read the question again and cannot imagine the picture you uploaded in my head at all. Thanks! I read the stem carefully. We are told that: Cubic boxes are stacked in square layers > each layer is a square; The bottom of the layer has 81 boxes > the bottom layer has 9 rows and each row has 9 boxes. Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it > the second layer has 8 rows and each row has 8 boxes. ... Hope it helps. I got confused (and I still am) by the line which says "Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it" I got that the bottom layer will have 9 x 9 boxes I also understand that the next level up will have 8 rows of boxes and since this layer also has to form a square hence it needs 8 boxes in the column as well. What is elusive for me is "and 1 fewer box in each remaining row[/color] than the layer directly below it". Can you please explain again. Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it: 1st layer has 9 rows and 9 boxes in each of them. 2nd row has 1 fewer, so 8 rows and each of the remaining 8 rows has 1 fewer box, so 8 boxes in it. Hope it's clear.



Manager
Joined: 14 Jan 2013
Posts: 128
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT Date: 08012013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Mar 2014, 16:02
Bunuel,
Do you have more examples like these questions? I am finding it difficult to understand after reading question.
Thanks
~M14



Manager
Joined: 20 Oct 2013
Posts: 50

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 May 2014, 06:30
superb explanation Bunnel! i couldnt understand the qs...



Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2012
Posts: 273
Weight: 170lbs
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42 GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
WE: Analyst (Other)

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Apr 2015, 17:42
Bunuel wrote: imhimanshu wrote: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square layers. Each layer consists of cubic boxes arranged in rows that form a square, and each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it. If the bottom of the layer has 81 boxes and the top of the layer has only 1 box, how many boxes are in display?
A. 236 B. 260 C. 269 D. 276 E. 285 Basically we have a 9layer pyramid as shown below: Attachment: pyramid_with_corner_cube_from_istock.jpg (Actually this pyramid 8layer, couldn't find 9layer one image)The number of boxes would be: 9^2 + 8^2 + 7^2 + 6^2 + 5^2 + 4^2 + 3^2 + 2^2 + 1 = 285. You can use the sum of the first n perfect squares formula to calculate: \(\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}=\frac{9*(9+1)(2*9+1)}{6}=285\). Answer: E. Hope it's clear. Is there any chance you can apply why that 6 is there? I want to make sure I can apply this formula in more complicated cases.



Intern
Joined: 26 Jul 2014
Posts: 2

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Oct 2015, 19:42
Here's where nonnative speakers could have trouble. By display I kept thinking of a computer display and I tried to visualize boxes arranged within the TV, and jumped into the conclusion that this was similar to a problem in the OG (13th Ed. PS 124). Now, if you don't know the formula for the sum of the first n perfect squares (I actually forgot it on a second attempt), it is just nonsense to sum each square result. plaverbach's approach is the appropriate one. After taking a look at the answers and noticing that only two of them have the same units number, you pray that those are wrong and go ahead and find that unit.



Intern
Joined: 12 Nov 2014
Posts: 18

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Jan 2016, 10:17
I liked plaverbach approach, as I couldn't understand the question in the first place and choose random wrong answer. But when I saw the picture posted, I could use the plaverbach approach.



Intern
Joined: 26 May 2014
Posts: 39
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Aug 2016, 13:01
Attachment: File comment: Visualize the Question this Way
IMG_20160830_012335.jpg [ 1.04 MiB  Viewed 37011 times ]
In the above figures ,small circles are akin to cubic boxes and lines are rows. So bottom most layer has 9*9 = 81 boxes . Now this figure has more layers stacked on top of it and each layer has 1 less box(small circle) and 1 less row( line). If you follow this theory then you will notice that no of rows = no of boxes in each row. So 2nd layer from the top will have 2 rows with 2 boxes each. Similarly top most layer will have 1 row and 1 box. So the total no of boxes will be : 9* 9 + 8*8 +.....+ 1*1 = 285 .



Intern
Joined: 10 Aug 2016
Posts: 5

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Oct 2016, 02:00
possibly the worst worded question i've ever read



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 8282

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square layers
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Jan 2017, 19:39
ashikaverma13 wrote: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square layers. Each layer consists of cubic boxes arranged in rows that form a square, and each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it. If the bottom layer has 21 boxes and the top layer has only 1 box, how many boxes are in the display?
A. 236 B. 260 C. 269 D. 276 E. 285 Hi, The Q seems to be flawed as 21 cannot be the number of boxes . It is either 81 or 25. You can imagine this as a huge cube from which steps are made in 2 sides by removing a row of boxes in each layer. In numerical value,all the layers will be square of integers starting from 1 on top to 5 or 9 in lowermost. When we add these, it becomes \(1^2+2^2+3^2+4^2+5^2+6^2+7^2+8^2+9^2\) Either add all of them or use formula SUM=\(\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}\)=9*(9+1)*(2*9+1)/6=9*10*19/6=15*19=285 E
_________________



Intern
Joined: 07 Dec 2016
Posts: 36

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Mar 2017, 15:14
I had a tough time understanding the question as well



Director
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 576
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33 GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33 GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Jul 2017, 06:57
Yeah i thought from each square floor, one block is removed. solved like 9^2 1 + 8^2 1 + .... + 2^2 1 + 1 ( since it is said from below floor one block is removed) . And perplexed over where is the answer. Now i understood what does it mean. It simply means a square box is missing from row in each subsequent floor.



Intern
Joined: 15 May 2017
Posts: 9

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Feb 2018, 11:03
As we know the series is 9^2+8^2.....+2^2+1 we know there are 5 odd+4 even=odd hence striking off Answer choices A,B,and D now we can sum only the unit digits of the squares 1+4+9+6+5+6+9+4+1=X5 hence answer choice ending with 5 is the Answer
Answer :E



EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/CoFounder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 15636
Location: United States (CA)

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Mar 2018, 16:06
Hi All, The math behind this question is not difficult  it's just about adding the perfect squares from 1^2 to 9^2, inclusive. While it might take a little time to "visualize" what this question describes, the actual "work" is not too challenging. If a child can do the math, then you should be able to (and faster). There is an interesting shortcut built into the math though. From the answer choices, you'll notice that almost all of the units digits are unique (6, 0, 9 and 5). This provides a likely shortcut that can help us to avoid a bit of the math. 1 4 9 16 25 36 49 64 81  ? The nine numbers above can be "paired up" to create 4 values that end in a 0: 1+ 9 > ends in 0 4 + 16 > ends in 0 36 + 64 > ends in 0 49 + 81 > ends in 0 and 25 The sum MUST end in a 5 and there's only one answer that matches… Final Answer: GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich
_________________
Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.comThe Course Used By GMAT Club Moderators To Earn 750+ souvik101990 Score: 760 Q50 V42 ★★★★★ ENGRTOMBA2018 Score: 750 Q49 V44 ★★★★★



Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2016
Posts: 104

For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Mar 2018, 09:55
Bunuel wrote: You can use the sum of the first n perfect squares formula to calculate: \(\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}=\frac{9*(9+1)(2*9+1)}{6}=285\). Answer: E. Hope it's clear. Attachment: pyramid_with_corner_cube_from_istock.jpg Or you can just multiply the units of the numbers and add them all together you will get a result of 5. The only answer ending in 5 is the correct one
_________________
lets all unite to reach our target together




For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
22 Mar 2018, 09:55



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 21 posts ]



