Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 11:30 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 11:30
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
555-605 (Medium)|   Weaken|         
User avatar
RaviChandra
User avatar
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Last visit: 06 Feb 2023
Posts: 305
Own Kudos:
4,311
 [16]
Given Kudos: 412
GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
WE:Business Development (Consulting)
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Posts: 305
Kudos: 4,311
 [16]
For a television program about astrology, investigators went into the 02 Jul 2015, 05:23
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

76% (01:46) correct 24% (02:18) wrong based on 1199 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
For a television program about astrology, investigators went into the street and found twenty volunteers born under the sign of Gemini who were willing to be interviewed on the program and to take a personality test. The test confirmed the investigators' personal impressions that each of the volunteers was more sociable and extroverted than people are on average. This modest investigation thus supports the claim that one's astrological birth sign influence one's personality.

Which one of the following, if true, indicates the most serious flaw in the method used by the investigators?


(A) The personality test was not administrated or scored personally by the investigators.

(B) People born under astrological signs other than Gemini have been judged by astrologers to be much less sociable than those born under Gemini.

(C) The personal impressions the investigators first formed of other people have tended to be confirmed by the investigators' later experience of those people.

(D) There is not likely to be a greater proportion of people born under the sign of Gemini on the street than in the population as a whole.

(E) People who are not sociable and extroverted are not likely to agree to participate in such an investigation.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
E
avatar
cris053
avatar
Joined: 23 Sep 2017
Last visit: 11 Feb 2018
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
For a television program about astrology, investigators went into the 09 Nov 2017, 00:40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the argument is about astrology and personality, and E does not weaken the argument
User avatar
chesstitans
User avatar
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 Nov 2019
Posts: 963
Own Kudos:
1,936
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,561
Location: United States
Schools: Stanford '19 Carroll '19 LBS '19
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Schools: Stanford '19 Carroll '19 LBS '19
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
Posts: 963
Kudos: 1,936
 [1]
For a television program about astrology, investigators went into the 12 Nov 2017, 20:57
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
this question is from LSAT; therefore, such question will be unlikely to be one of official gmat questions. Nevertheless, the pattern in E is important, and such pattern does appear in the actual gmat test. That is, E claims that the sample has problems since the beginning, and hence the result cannot be correct.

Using POE, we still choose E.
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 1,974
Own Kudos:
10,158
 [1]
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 1,974
Kudos: 10,158
 [1]
For a television program about astrology, investigators went into the 13 Dec 2017, 08:56
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RaviChandra
For a television program about astrology, investigators went into the street and found twenty volunteers born under the sign of Gemini who were willing to be interviewed on the program and to take a personality test. The test confirmed the investigators' personal impressions that each of the volunteers was more sociable and extroverted than people are on average. This modest investigation thus supports the claim that one's astrological birth sign influence one's personality.

Which one of the following, if true, indicates the most serious flaw in the method used by the investigators?

(A) The personality test was not administrated or scored personally by the investigators.

(B) People born under astrological signs other than Gemini have been judged by astrologers to be much less sociable than those born under Gemini.

(C) The personal impressions the investigators first formed of other people have tended to be confirmed by the investigators' later experience of those people.

(D) There is not likely to be a greater proportion of people born under the sign of Gemini on the street than in the population as a whole.

(E) People who are not sociable and extroverted are not likely to agree to participate in such an investigation.


Source : Lsat
Show more

Conclusion: Your signs influences your personality.
Premise: Twenty volunteers on the street were Geminis and more sociable/extroverted than average

This argument is assuming that there isn't some other reason the people chosen were more sociable/extroverted than average.
---> Was the sample representative of Gemini population in general?

(A) We don't care who scored/administered it, as long as the results are valid.

(B) This is about the judgment of astrologers, which is irrelevant here. We're doing science!

(C) This would prove that the investigators are good judges of character, not that astrology had anything to do with character.

(D) This is irrelevant. The investigators purposely found 20 geminis. It doesn't matter how many of them there were out on the street. If astrology affects personality, they could be the ONLY 20 geminis on the street.

(E) CORRECT. This provides another reason why the sample of people might have been more gregarious than average
avatar
Sateni7628
avatar
Joined: 18 Jan 2018
Last visit: 23 Aug 2020
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
36
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 44
Kudos: 36
For a television program about astrology, investigators went into the 12 Feb 2018, 10:48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RaviChandra
For a television program about astrology, investigators went into the street and found twenty volunteers born under the sign of Gemini who were willing to be interviewed on the program and to take a personality test. The test confirmed the investigators' personal impressions that each of the volunteers was more sociable and extroverted than people are on average. This modest investigation thus supports the claim that one's astrological birth sign influence one's personality.

Which one of the following, if true, indicates the most serious flaw in the method used by the investigators?

(A) The personality test was not administrated or scored personally by the investigators.

(B) People born under astrological signs other than Gemini have been judged by astrologers to be much less sociable than those born under Gemini.

(C) The personal impressions the investigators first formed of other people have tended to be confirmed by the investigators' later experience of those people.

(D) There is not likely to be a greater proportion of people born under the sign of Gemini on the street than in the population as a whole.

(E) People who are not sociable and extroverted are not likely to agree to participate in such an investigation.


Source : Lsat
Show more

All the volunteers belong to Gemini sign.
All volunteers are willing to be interviewed and to take personality test.
Test confirmed volunteers are more sociable & extroverted.
Hence investigators confirmed birth signs influence one's personality.

But there is a serious problem with the subjects investigated. Isn't it a biased group for this personality test? Because the subjects are already sociable & extroverted, they agreed to participate and the opposite group would have not agreed to participate. So it is not the birth sign that influenced their personality. Yayyyyy :lol:
User avatar
akadiyan
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 31 May 2017
Last visit: 20 Jun 2025
Posts: 724
Own Kudos:
706
Given Kudos: 53
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: IIMA PGPX'23 Bayes Said '23
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: IIMA PGPX'23 Bayes Said '23
Posts: 724
Kudos: 706
For a television program about astrology, investigators went into the 12 Feb 2018, 22:37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The premise claims that People born under the sign of Gemini will be more sociable and extroverted.

The option E says people who are not sociable and extroverted will not participate in investigation. Which weakens the argument, since people who volunteered are all sociable irrespective of the birth sign.

Ans: E
User avatar
unraveled
User avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,706
Own Kudos:
2,328
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,706
Kudos: 2,328
For a television program about astrology, investigators went into the 23 Jun 2022, 09:31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RaviChandra
For a television program about astrology, investigators went into the street and found twenty volunteers born under the sign of Gemini who were willing to be interviewed on the program and to take a personality test. The test confirmed the investigators' personal impressions that each of the volunteers was more sociable and extroverted than people are on average. This modest investigation thus supports the claim that one's astrological birth sign influence one's personality.

Which one of the following, if true, indicates the most serious flaw in the method used by the investigators?

(A) The personality test was not administrated or scored personally by the investigators.

(B) People born under astrological signs other than Gemini have been judged by astrologers to be much less sociable than those born under Gemini.

(C) The personal impressions the investigators first formed of other people have tended to be confirmed by the investigators' later experience of those people.

(D) There is not likely to be a greater proportion of people born under the sign of Gemini on the street than in the population as a whole.

(E) People who are not sociable and extroverted are not likely to agree to participate in such an investigation.
Show more
Other - more difficult - flaw could have been that interview didn't consider other people different sign with proportionality tested.

E is straight winner.
User avatar
francoisnoah819
User avatar
Joined: 14 Sep 2022
Last visit: 03 Feb 2023
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
2
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 7
Kudos: 2
For a television program about astrology, investigators went into the 22 Jan 2023, 07:31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This question is a classic weaken question. There are multiples ways to undermine an argument among which we can mention *unrepresentative sample or any errors that may appear in data which support the conclusion *.

Premise : investigators went into the street and found twenty volunteers born under the sign of Gemini who were willing to be interviewed on the program and to take a personality test.

Premise : The test confirmed the investigators' personal impressions that each of the volunteers was more sociable and extroverted than people are on average

The conclusion is : one's astrological birth sign influence one's personality. The preceding words clearly show that all that was mentioned in the text is mentioned to claim the final sentence of the stimulus which is therefore the conclusion.

Answer A: one may think that if it’s not investigators who administered the test the data are flawed but thinking that way would be helping the argument which clearly did not state that. No information related to the ability of those who conducted the experiment is provided so we cannot conclude anything about the quality of data. So it neither undermines nor helps the argument. Out!

Answer B : actually this one strengthens the argument. Let’s say this another way: Gemini people are more sociable than any other astronomical signs. We can conclude that the astronomical sign plays one role in some sort on the behavior of people. Ouch! Out!

Answer C : This one is irrelevant because the point of the argument is not the impression investigators have on people but the relation between astrological signs of people and their behavior. Ouch! Out!

Answer D : Still irrelevant friendo. Why? Because the argument talks about the relationship between people behavior and their astronomical signs and not between astrological signs and the proportions in the population.

Answer E: If you made till here you are goat because you are right. This answer simply states that the sample is biased in some sort or unrepresentative of the population. Among Gemini only those who are extroverted and sociable participate. There may be some others Gemini who are not sociable and extroverted but we may never know because they do not participate to the experiment.

Mr nobody

Posted from my mobile device
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
AbhishekP220108
495 posts
bhanu29
358 posts