GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Jan 2019, 00:24

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

     January 19, 2019

     January 19, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
  • FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

     January 20, 2019

     January 20, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     07:00 AM PST

    Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.

Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing importan

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 637
Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing importan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 16 Jan 2019, 20:40
14
71
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

72% (01:20) correct 28% (02:39) wrong based on 3990 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation. Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.

The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that


(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues

(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy

(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research

(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research

(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists

Originally posted by prasannar on 16 Mar 2008, 07:03.
Last edited by Bunuel on 16 Jan 2019, 20:40, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Most Helpful Community Reply
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Mar 2008
Posts: 123
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing importan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2008, 09:12
11
1
The premise is scientists think motivation to do important new research = worthy of colleague. Conclusion is when scientist wins renown, then scientist != colleague. So the assumption is those who win renown are not motivated, and therefore cannot be a colleague.

(D)
General Discussion
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 739
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing importan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Mar 2009, 04:25
3
OG(The Bible for GMAT) Reasoning:
What assumption do research scientists make about scientists who become popularizers?

The community of scientists shares a common goal:to do important new research.What would cause this community to disapprove of a popularizer? Any scientist who becomes a popularizer appears to have given up this shared goal in order to explain science to a general audience instead.This popularizer may be assumed to have lost the motivation to do important new research.

A The issue is the scientists’ goal.not the methods they use to achieve it.
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-polygons-87336.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 275
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing importan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Oct 2009, 17:07
2
TomB wrote:
151. Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their
colleagues those with similar motivation. Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science
to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true
colleague.
The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research
scientists assumes that
(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of
colleagues
(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy
(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research
(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated
to do important new research
(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not
themselves scientists
what is wrong with c?


The premise is that scientists take as their colleague, only the scientists who have motivation for doing important new research.

Conclusion is popular scientists no longer can be considered as colleague.

(D) Provides the missing link... that those well known are not motivated for doing imp new reasearch. (C) maybe a reason for that, but does nothing to this missing link or Assumption. Hence D wins
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Posts: 41
Schools: Wharton, Kellogg, Duke (Health care management)
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing importan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Oct 2009, 21:47
1
C says scientists 'can' become famous without doing any important research - this doesnt mean that everyone who become a popularizer didn't do important research.
D applies to all such people. Hence D is the answer.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 146
Schools: Columbia, INSEAD, RSM, LBS
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing importan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Nov 2009, 02:34
7
Lets try and do it mathematically

Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their
colleagues those with similar motivation. Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science
to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true
colleague.

1) Scientists accept = people with equal motivation
2) Scientists do not accept = people who win acclaim or Popularizers

From 1) and 2)

Popularizers do not have the motivation

Hence clearly D

Hope this Helps
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 444
Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing importan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2015, 22:23
2
Premise:
scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation.
Conclusion:
Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.

Assumption:
A populizer doesn't have motivation of doing important new research.

The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that

(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research
>> This doesnt answer abt the motivation in popularizer.
(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research
>> Negate D and it casts doubt on conclusion.
Current Student
User avatar
B
Status: DONE!
Joined: 05 Sep 2016
Posts: 374
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing importan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2016, 07:25
2
D is correct. Here's why:

(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues --> this isn't the author's argument; he never alludes to cooperation being necessary to be deemed a "true colleague"

(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy --> irrelevant

(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research --> true, but this doesn't mean that that individual is not motivated

(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research --> BINGO!; if you aren't motivated to do new research, then you aren't a "true colleague"

(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists --> irrelevant
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 11 Sep 2017
Posts: 18
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing importan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jan 2018, 04:35
1
Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation. Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.

The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that

(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues

(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy

(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research

(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research

(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists[/quote]

PREMISES:
1. Research scientists want to do important new research.
2. Other research scientists are considered as colleagues if they also want to do important new research (similar motivation).

CONCLUSION:
When a scientist becomes famous among the general public for explaining scientific principles, he/she (popularizer) should not be regarded as a colleague by other scientists.

PRE-THINK:
As the premise says that a scientist should do important new research to be considered as a colleague, and that popularizers are doing research to be famous, so these popularizers are not doing important new research (assumed by the scientific community).

ANALYSIS OF THE ANSWER CHOICES:

(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues.
We are concerned as to why a popularizer is not regarded as a colleague. Working by themselves or in groups does not connect the premises and the conclusion.

(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy.
The passage does not talk about "envy".

(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research.
"HOW" a scientist becomes a famous popularizer is not our concern; we want to know why they are not considered as a true colleague.

(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research.
This matches with our pre-thinking.

(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists.
"access and assessment of new research by non-scientists" is not talked about in the passage.
BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1219
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing importan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2018, 02:28
Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation. Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.

The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that

(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues
-The argument is not about research but rather regarding scientists themselves

(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy
-Incorrect

(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research
-The argument is not about how the scientists can become popularizer

(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research
-Correct. Since popular scientists don't have motivation that's why other scientists disregard them.

(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists
-Out of scope
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!
Preparing for RC my way
RC Summary Activity - New Project to imporve RC Skills
Bloomberg's US Bschool Ranking

My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant | 2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation | 3. LSAT RC compilation | 4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal | 5. QOTD RC (Carcass) | 6. Challange OG RC | 7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 10 Aug 2018
Posts: 3
CAT Tests
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing importan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Oct 2018, 06:35
Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept
as their colleagues those with similar motivation. Therefore, when any scientist wins renown
as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this
popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague. The explanation offered
above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists
assumes that:

A. serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues
B. research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy
C. a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research
D. research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research
E. no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists

Can you explain how exactly is 'D' weakening the conclusion?
Orion Representative
User avatar
S
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 342
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing importan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Oct 2018, 09:27
Top Contributor
Amrutha1 wrote:
Can you explain how exactly is 'D' weakening the conclusion?


As written, D strengthens the conclusion (it's an assumption question, where the correct answer is a necessary premise in order for the conclusion to be true). Where you may be getting "weaken" earlier in the thread is from people critiquing/weakening the argument as given, because doing so helps you understand the gap that needs to be filled. On any Strengthen or Assumption question, attacking the argument is pretty good strategy so that you understand what makes it weak and where it most needs to be strengthened.

Notice that the premise and conclusion don't really connect here at all:

Premise: Scientists accept as colleagues those who do important research.

Conclusion: Therefore they won't welcome those who expound to large audiences.

The gap here is "what does expounding to large audiences have to do with doing important research?" --> the premise and conclusion aren't connected at all, and that's where they miss each other (one's about research, the other is about expounding to large audiences).

(D) as written helps to connect that gap: hey if you are a large-audience expounder, your colleagues think you're not interested in research. And (D) is a lot easier to find if you noted earlier what made the argument so weak in the first place.


is people critiquing/weakening the argument as given, because doing so helps you understand the gap that needs to be filled. On any Strengthen or Assumption question, attacking the argument is pretty good strategy so that you understand what makes it weak
_________________

Brian

Curriculum Developer, Instructor, and Host of Veritas Prep On Demand

Save $100 on live Veritas Prep GMAT Courses and Admissions Consulting

Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing importan &nbs [#permalink] 25 Oct 2018, 09:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing importan

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.