Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 06:19 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 06:19
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7 
655-705 Level|   Strengthen|         
User avatar
rsrobin864
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2020
Last visit: 10 Jan 2025
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
77
Given Kudos: 60
Location: India
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 65
Kudos: 77
GMAT Club Olympics 2024 (Day 1): Psychologist: In a study, children 09 Jul 2024, 05:45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Bunuel
Psychologist: In a study, children were observed in a room filled with various toys. When an adult was present in the room, the children were more likely to share toys with their siblings than with non-siblings. This suggests that children are more inclined to share with family members when they feel they are being observed by an authority figure.

The psychologist's argument would be most strengthened if it were true that, during the study, the children exhibited increased sharing behavior when:

A. the toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home.

B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.

C. the siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys.

D. the room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys.

E. the adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling.


­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
Show more
­Need to strengthen

Need to show that the adult helped encourage the sharing of the toy

A.out of scope
B.whether he is the parent of sibling or not doesnt matter
C.Out of scope
D.Not concerned 
E.Answer as shows how the adult helped in sharing

E is the answer
User avatar
miami60
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2023
Last visit: 26 May 2025
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
12
Given Kudos: 1
Status:Alumni
Affiliations: UBAYA
Location: Indonesia
mia: mia
Concentration: Accounting, Finance
GPA: 2.6
WE:Accounting (Manufacturing)
Posts: 6
Kudos: 12
GMAT Club Olympics 2024 (Day 1): Psychologist: In a study, children 09 Jul 2024, 05:54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My answer is D, a child will fill safe and want to share toys to others if there's some toys available for playing

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Leo_1511
User avatar
Joined: 28 Nov 2022
Last visit: 01 Apr 2025
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
13
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 17
Kudos: 13
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2024 (Day 1): Psychologist: In a study, children 09 Jul 2024, 06:14
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­You can eliminate rest of the option by POE. 
The answer to this question should be B as it suggests that the behaviour of the childer might be influenced by a familiar figure (authority--parent in this case). Thus the psychologist's argument would be most strengthened if the children exhibited increased sharing behavior in this case.

Answer - B 
User avatar
vjbhagat
User avatar
Joined: 11 Dec 2022
Last visit: 31 Mar 2025
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
77
Given Kudos: 10
GMAT Focus 1: 705 Q90 V84 DI81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT Focus 1: 705 Q90 V84 DI81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 36
Kudos: 77
GMAT Club Olympics 2024 (Day 1): Psychologist: In a study, children 09 Jul 2024, 06:14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. the toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home:- Old or new toys won't have any effect on sharing, hence this is not the correct answer

B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult:- The adult will be the parent of a certain number of children, and will be stranger or non-relative adult for all other children. Hence this statement does not strengthen the argument, hence not the correct answer.

C. the siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys:- in this case the children then should be sharing the toys with non-siblings, as they are adept at using the toys, so this statement actually weakens the argument, Hence not the correct answer.

D. the room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys:- the number of toys does not have any effect on whether children share toys with siblings or non-siblings. Hence not the correct answer.

E. the adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling:- Here, even after the adult encouraged the children to share irrespective of sibling or non-sibling, children were more likely to share with siblings. Hence this statement strengthens the argument. Hence the correct answer.­
User avatar
tulee
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2024
Last visit: 15 Oct 2025
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
53
 [1]
Given Kudos: 53
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: NUS '27 Erasmus Bocconi
Schools: NUS '27 Erasmus Bocconi
Posts: 66
Kudos: 53
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2024 (Day 1): Psychologist: In a study, children 09 Jul 2024, 06:46
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Psychologist: In a study, children were observed in a room filled with various toys. When an adult was present in the room, the children were more likely to share toys with their siblings than with non-siblings. This suggests that children are more inclined to share with family members when they feel they are being observed by an authority figure.

The psychologist's argument would be most strengthened if it were true that, during the study, the children exhibited increased sharing behavior when:

A. the toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home.

B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.

C. the siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys.

D. the room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys.

E. the adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling.


­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
Show more
­B since it links all the necessary components mentioned in text together to make the conclusion more sound. 
Parents => are family members + also parents of their siblings + authority figure => children are more inclined to share with family members when parents are present in the room
User avatar
paradise1234
User avatar
Joined: 21 Nov 2023
Last visit: 24 Jan 2025
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
42
 [1]
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 32
Kudos: 42
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2024 (Day 1): Psychologist: In a study, children 09 Jul 2024, 06:52
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­The question says that the children were more inclined to share with siblings than non-siblings. The fact that needs to be verified is that the kids want to share the toys with siblings more than non-siblings or they have already played with similar toys at home with their siblings and hence it's the familiarity that is driving them to play with the siblings.
Option A talks about this angle. hence the correct answer.
User avatar
Gemmie
User avatar
Joined: 19 Dec 2021
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 491
Own Kudos:
428
 [1]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Technology, Economics
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
GPA: 3.55
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
Posts: 491
Kudos: 428
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2024 (Day 1): Psychologist: In a study, children 09 Jul 2024, 09:20
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­The best answer to strengthen the psychologist's argument is: B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.

Why: Parents hold a special position of authority in a child's life compared to strangers or non-relatives. (A stranger may not know the child's relationship with other children but a parent surely does)

Other options:

A. New vs. familiar toys: New toys might spark more competition initially, but it wouldn't necessarily influence who they share with.

C. Age/Skill difference: While needing help might make sharing easier, it doesn't address the core argument of sharing with family under observation.

D. More toys: Abundance of toys might make sharing easier, but it doesn't directly connect to the role of the observing adult.

E. Explicit encouragement: This would strengthen the overall point of sharing, but it doesn't address the psychologist's specific claim about family and authority figures.­
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 42,384
Own Kudos:
82,114
 [2]
Given Kudos: 24,107
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 42,384
Kudos: 82,114
 [2]
GMAT Club Olympics 2024 (Day 1): Psychologist: In a study, children 09 Jul 2024, 17:13
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Gemmie
­The best answer to strengthen the psychologist's argument is: B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.

Why: Parents hold a special position of authority in a child's life compared to strangers or non-relatives. (A stranger may not know the child's relationship with other children but a parent surely does)

Other options:

A. New vs. familiar toys: New toys might spark more competition initially, but it wouldn't necessarily influence who they share with.

C. Age/Skill difference: While needing help might make sharing easier, it doesn't address the core argument of sharing with family under observation.

D. More toys: Abundance of toys might make sharing easier, but it doesn't directly connect to the role of the observing adult.

E. Explicit encouragement: This would strengthen the overall point of sharing, but it doesn't address the psychologist's specific claim about family and authority figures.­
Show more
­

Gemmie, Thank you! Plese note you will have to make a post before the OA release deadline which is 7 AM PST, and was about 2 hours BEFORE your post. You got it right nowever 👍­
User avatar
Itssuyash
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2024
Last visit: 02 Jan 2025
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
3
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT Focus 1: 475 Q72 V74 DI75
GPA: 4.0
GMAT Focus 1: 475 Q72 V74 DI75
Posts: 3
Kudos: 3
GMAT Club Olympics 2024 (Day 1): Psychologist: In a study, children 09 Jul 2024, 23:49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Answer Choice B very strongly suggest being observed by parent (Authority Figure)
User avatar
thelastskybender
User avatar
Joined: 26 Dec 2022
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
75
 [1]
Given Kudos: 50
Location: India
Schools: IIMA '25 (II) INSEAD Aug'24 intake
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
Schools: IIMA '25 (II) INSEAD Aug'24 intake
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
Posts: 132
Kudos: 75
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2024 (Day 1): Psychologist: In a study, children 10 Jul 2024, 00:04
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Bunuel

Bunuel
Psychologist: In a study, children were observed in a room filled with various toys. When an adult was present in the room, the children were more likely to share toys with their siblings than with non-siblings. This suggests that children are more inclined to share with family members when they feel they are being observed by an authority figure.

The psychologist's argument would be most strengthened if it were true that, during the study, the children exhibited increased sharing behavior when:

A. the toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home.

B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.

C. the siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys.

D. the room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys.

E. the adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling.


­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­

GMAT Club Official Explanation:



Correct Answer: B. The observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.

This answer strengthens the psychologist's argument that children are more inclined to share with family members when observed by an authority figure by specifying that the authority figure is closely related to the children. This suggests that the presence of a familiar authority figure (like a parent), as opposed to a stranger, might have a significant impact on the children's choice to share specifically with siblings, reinforcing the observation's connection to familial authority.

A. The toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home. This choice does not directly affect the children's decision to share with siblings versus non-siblings when observed by an adult. It focuses on the novelty of toys, which is unrelated to the influence of an adult observer on familial sharing behavior.

C. The siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys This choice introduces another variable (the age and competence of the children) that could influence sharing behavior, but it does not directly support the idea that observation by an adult specifically encourages sharing with siblings.

D. The room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys. This option focuses on the availability of toys rather than the influence of an adult's presence on sharing behavior. While more toys might make sharing easier, it doesn’t specifically strengthen the argument about sharing more with siblings under adult observation.

E. The adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling. This choice weakens the argument rather than strengthening it. If the adult encouraged sharing with all children equally, it suggests that the observed difference in sharing between siblings and non-siblings might not be influenced by the adult’s familial relationship but simply by general encouragement to share.­
Show more
@bb ­Though option B strengthens the fact that presence of a familiar authority figure (like a parent), as opposed to a stranger makes children more inclined to share with family members, but the problem is that this is not the conlusion we want to strengthen in the question. We want to strengthen that 'children are more inclined to share with family members when they feel they are being observed by an authority figure' not familiar authority figure. In my opinion option B is also not a good option. Moreover there is "or" between stranger and non-relative. So by choosing the option B we further assume that a non-relative adult can't be an authority figure. What if that person is a teacher? ­
User avatar
Dharmk9
User avatar
Joined: 20 Feb 2023
Last visit: 26 Dec 2024
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
GMAT Club Olympics 2024 (Day 1): Psychologist: In a study, children 10 Jul 2024, 20:19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Study---> Children are field with toys and share toys to siblings with the present of the adult of the family.
Conclusion---> children are more inclined to share with family members when they feel they are being observed by an authority figure.
Strenghtening statement should clarify that observing adults are the parents of the children.
this contain only in Option B Correct answer
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 42,384
Own Kudos:
82,114
 [1]
Given Kudos: 24,107
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 42,384
Kudos: 82,114
 [1]
GMAT Club Olympics 2024 (Day 1): Psychologist: In a study, children 11 Jul 2024, 07:17
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
thelastskybender

Quote:

@bb ­Though option B strengthens the fact that presence of a familiar authority figure (like a parent), as opposed to a stranger makes children more inclined to share with family members, but the problem is that this is not the conlusion we want to strengthen in the question. We want to strengthen that 'children are more inclined to share with family members when they feel they are being observed by an authority figure' not familiar authority figure. In my opinion option B is also not a good option. Moreover there is "or" between stranger and non-relative. So by choosing the option B we further assume that a non-relative adult can't be an authority figure. What if that person is a teacher? ­
Show more
­Hi. Thank you very much for the question and poking deeper into it. This helps us make questions better and get better feedback!

In terms of your suggestion that B makes an assumption that a stranger cannot be an authority figure - it is a bit of the opposite. We do not assume they cannot be, but we rather must guarantee. You are absolutely correct that someoen may be a teacher or a police officer and thus would be a figure of authority in a child's mind. However, the correct answer choice must always work. If it does not work sometimes (e.g. 1 out of 99 times it is not a police officer or a teacher), then it is not the correct answer. The reason the parent was used was because they would be an automatic authority to a child. The other option would be to write a teacher just like you said, but it would have to be specific so that it is always the case. 

Let me know if I missed your point (it happens)
Thank you,
BB
User avatar
AldrinAntonyPJ
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2022
Last visit: 15 Sep 2025
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 41
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
GMAT Club Olympics 2024 (Day 1): Psychologist: In a study, children 13 Jul 2024, 03:19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­A. The toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home.

Weaken: If the toys were new, the children might be more excited and curious, influencing their sharing behavior regardless of the presence of an authority figure. This introduces a variable unrelated to authority presence, making it harder to attribute increased sharing solely to the presence of the authority figure.

B. The observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.

Mixed:


  • Strengthen: It could show that children respond to the presence of a familiar authority figure by sharing more with siblings, supporting the idea that authority presence encourages sharing with family.
  • Weaken: It might introduce bias as children could be behaving to gain parental approval specifically, rather than responding to the general concept of an authority figure. This makes it difficult to generalize the findings to other authority figures.
C. The siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys.

Weaken: If the siblings are younger and need help, increased sharing could be due to older children feeling responsible or empathetic rather than the presence of an authority figure. This introduces another variable (age and need for assistance) that could explain the increased sharing.

D. The room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys.

Weaken: An abundance of toys might naturally lead to more sharing because the children don't feel a scarcity of resources. This could reduce the perceived impact of the authority figure on the sharing behavior, as children might share simply because there are enough toys for everyone.

E. The adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling.

Weaken: If the adult explicitly encourages sharing, the increased sharing behavior could be attributed to the direct instruction rather than the presence of the authority figure. This introduces a direct intervention that confounds the results, making it unclear if the authority's presence alone would have had the same effect.

Summary


  • Strengthen: B (with the caveat of introducing bias due to parental influence)
  • Weaken: A, C, D, E
User avatar
ahmedbougacha
User avatar
Joined: 11 Feb 2024
Last visit: 10 Oct 2024
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
2
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 2
GMAT Club Olympics 2024 (Day 1): Psychologist: In a study, children 14 Jul 2024, 08:27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the answer is B­
as the observer was a family, and the child continue to give toy to their sibling. it can be assumed tha there is an influence from the family on the child. this confirms the conclusion of the psychologist. 
 
avatar
Vishnu0007
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2024
Last visit: 17 Aug 2025
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
1
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 12
Kudos: 1
GMAT Club Olympics 2024 (Day 1): Psychologist: In a study, children 31 Aug 2024, 03:49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone please explain why it is B and not E?

Does authority figure mean familiar people??
User avatar
ikigai9
User avatar
Joined: 13 Dec 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 6
Location: India
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
GMAT Club Olympics 2024 (Day 1): Psychologist: In a study, children 13 Jul 2025, 01:45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
This suggests that children are more inclined to share with family members when they feel they are being observed by an authority figure.
Show more
As far as I understand, the conclusion is children are more inclined to share with siblings (as compared to non-siblings) when there's an authority figure present (an adult).

Between B and E --> B specifies that the authority figure was a parent, but no emphasis as to why the inclination to share is more. As compared with E, the adult has encouraged to share, regardless whether it's a sibling or not, and the inclination to share was higher for siblings.

I feel the answer to be E.
Bunuel
Bunuel
Psychologist: In a study, children were observed in a room filled with various toys. When an adult was present in the room, the children were more likely to share toys with their siblings than with non-siblings. This suggests that children are more inclined to share with family members when they feel they are being observed by an authority figure.

The psychologist's argument would be most strengthened if it were true that, during the study, the children exhibited increased sharing behavior when:

A. the toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home.

B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.

C. the siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys.

D. the room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys.

E. the adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling.


­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­

GMAT Club Official Explanation:



Correct Answer: B. The observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.

This answer strengthens the psychologist's argument that children are more inclined to share with family members when observed by an authority figure by specifying that the authority figure is closely related to the children. This suggests that the presence of a familiar authority figure (like a parent), as opposed to a stranger, might have a significant impact on the children's choice to share specifically with siblings, reinforcing the observation's connection to familial authority.

A. The toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home. This choice does not directly affect the children's decision to share with siblings versus non-siblings when observed by an adult. It focuses on the novelty of toys, which is unrelated to the influence of an adult observer on familial sharing behavior.

C. The siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys This choice introduces another variable (the age and competence of the children) that could influence sharing behavior, but it does not directly support the idea that observation by an adult specifically encourages sharing with siblings.

D. The room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys. This option focuses on the availability of toys rather than the influence of an adult's presence on sharing behavior. While more toys might make sharing easier, it doesn’t specifically strengthen the argument about sharing more with siblings under adult observation.

E. The adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling. This choice weakens the argument rather than strengthening it. If the adult encouraged sharing with all children equally, it suggests that the observed difference in sharing between siblings and non-siblings might not be influenced by the adult’s familial relationship but simply by general encouragement to share.­
Show more
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
188 posts