Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 07:36 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 07:36
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
bhavjot
Joined: 01 Nov 2023
Last visit: 01 Jul 2025
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
6
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Economics
Posts: 1
Kudos: 6
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
unnati157
User avatar
Booth School Moderator
Joined: 13 Nov 2023
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 122
Own Kudos:
34
 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q82 V84 DI81
GMAT Focus 2: 675 Q87 V81 DI82
GPA: 3.99
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Prakharrrrrrrr
Joined: 06 Jan 2024
Last visit: 26 Mar 2025
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
7
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 4
Kudos: 7
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Tasha123
Joined: 01 Jul 2019
Last visit: 22 Dec 2024
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 327
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
adults stimulate to share with everybody
User avatar
Varshit.cv
Joined: 03 Jul 2023
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Looks like D to me as it hints on the fact that even though there were multiple toys to share with, yet kids chose to share it with their siblings rather than strangers ultimately strengthening the argument or the psychologist's argument.
User avatar
8Harshitsharma
Joined: 25 Oct 2017
Last visit: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 133
Own Kudos:
142
 [1]
Given Kudos: 723
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q87 V80 DI80
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GRE 1: Q165 V160
GRE 2: Q170 V162
GPA: 9.25
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q87 V80 DI80
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GRE 1: Q165 V160
GRE 2: Q170 V162
Posts: 133
Kudos: 142
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Quote:
 
Psychologist: In a study, children were observed in a room filled with various toys. When an adult was present in the room, the children were more likely to share toys with their siblings than with non-siblings. This suggests that children are more inclined to share with family members when they feel they are being observed by an authority figure.

The psychologist's argument would be most strengthened if it were true that, during the study, the children exhibited increased sharing behavior when:

The gist: We need to strengthen the claim that children are more inclined to share with family members when being observed by an authority (such as a parent). Note that the claim doesn't specifically talk about toys, so any answer choice that talks about sharing in front of an authority would be relevant to us.

A. the toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home.
  • This option focuses on the novelty of the toys, which might influence the children's interest in sharing but doesn't directly address the influence of an authority figure or the difference in sharing behavior between siblings and non-siblings.
B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.
  • This is direct evidence of the stated effect, as we had anticipated in the gist.
C. The siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys.
  • This choice suggests an alternate reason for sharing the toys with the siblings - because they needed help in understanding the toys.
D. the room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys.
  • This choice too is suggesting something peculiar and not talking about the authority figure.
E. the adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling.
  • This looks close to what we need but this choice doesn't talk about toy sharing under "observation" by an adult. Here, the adult is encouraging children to share the toys, so we can't infer whether children would be more inclined to share their toys without the encouragement of the adult.
­
User avatar
RenB
Joined: 13 Jul 2022
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 391
Own Kudos:
1,361
 [1]
Given Kudos: 303
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Nonprofit
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q90 V84 DI82
GPA: 3.74
WE:Corporate Finance (Consulting)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Psychologist: In a study, children were observed in a room filled with various toys. When an adult was present in the room, the children were more likely to share toys with their siblings than with non-siblings. This suggests that children are more inclined to share with family members when they feel they are being observed by an authority figure.

The psychologist's argument would be most strengthened if it were true that, during the study, the children exhibited increased sharing behavior when:

A. the toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home.

B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.

C. the siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys.

D. the room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys.

E. the adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling.


­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­I feel the key lies in noticing 'they feel they are being observed'. I read the stem. Noted the conclucion:
Children > likely to share w fam members--- they feel they are being obs-- by auth fig
Given the observation- When there was an adult in the room, they shared w siblings compared to non-siblings.

I have to strengthen this conclusion. Basically strengthen a cause and effect. Possible ways could be offsetting other factors, confirming obvious assumptions, etc.

A. This gives me an alternate reason why children shared- they could have shared because new toys, not because there is an auth figure.
B. The observing adult was a parent- thus more likely that the child 'felt' that they were being observed. Possible strengthener- keep
C. This gives me an alternate reason why children shared- not because auth fig, but because siblings were younger and needed help
D. This gives me an alternate reason why children shared. not because auth fig, but because easier to share.
E. This is not strengthening the impact of the adult/ auth figure supervision. If the adult encouraged sharing both, this does not strengthen the inclination .

So I think B.
User avatar
boomer1ang
Joined: 13 Oct 2022
Last visit: 12 Oct 2025
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
57
 [1]
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 50
Kudos: 57
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. the toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home.
Although might be true, this has no relevance to adult being present or sharing with siblings vs non-siblings.

B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.
This is directly relevant.

C. the siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys.
Although might be true, it will still be true when no adult is present and should not affect outcome.

D. the room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys.
This does not explain why they share only with siblings and not non-siblings.

E. the adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling.
It clearly states they were encouraged to share with any child. Weakener.

Answer (B)
User avatar
VivekSri
Joined: 01 May 2022
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 468
Own Kudos:
721
 [1]
Given Kudos: 117
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Posts: 468
Kudos: 721
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Psychologist: In a study, children were observed in a room filled with various toys. When an adult was present in the room, the children were more likely to share toys with their siblings than with non-siblings. This suggests that children are more inclined to share with family members when they feel they are being observed by an authority figure.

The psychologist's argument would be most strengthened if it were true that, during the study, the children exhibited increased sharing behavior when:

A. the toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home.

B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.

C. the siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys.

D. the room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys.

E. the adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling.


­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­I will go with Option B.

In order to strengthen the conclusion related to authority figure we can say that when observed adult is parent then it will strengthen the conclusion.
option B directly addresses the role of the authority figure by specifying adult is a parent of the siblings. This directly supports the hypothesis that the presence of an authority figure influences sharing behavior towards family members, thus strengthening the psychologist's argument.

 
User avatar
said.tojiboev
User avatar
PhD Forum Moderator
Joined: 04 Oct 2018
Last visit: 20 Oct 2025
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
60
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Location: Uzbekistan
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Stanford '27
GPA: 4.49
WE:Project Management (Education)
Schools: Stanford '27
Posts: 65
Kudos: 60
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: children are more inclined to share with FAMILY MEMBERS when they feel they are being OBSERVED by an authority figure.

A. the toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home. (Focuses on toy novelty, not authority figure influence.)

B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult. (Correct because it shows a stronger authority figure influence, enhancing the likelihood of sharing with siblings)

C. the siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys. (Focuses on helping younger siblings, not authority figure influence.)

D. the room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys. (Focuses on toy availability, not authority figure influence.)

E. the adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling. (Encourages sharing with all, not just siblings, so doesn't support the argument.)
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 8,422
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,422
Kudos: 4,981
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Quote:
 
Premise : ­room filled with toys and children , in presence of adult , children shared toys with siblings more than with non siblings

strengthen argument : 
A. the toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home. ; 
does not strengthen argument 

B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.
does not strengthen argument 


C. the siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys.
does not strengthen argument 

D. the room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys.
does not strengthen argument ; conclusion stands as not being strengthened 

E. the adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling.
strengthens the argument with reasoning , directly strengthens the conclusion 

OPTION E is correct
 
User avatar
FranCifu
Joined: 11 Jun 2024
Last visit: 24 Nov 2024
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
30
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 44
Kudos: 30
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­For a strenght question the answer choice need to make it more likely for the conclusion to be correct.
In this case the conclusion was that children are more inclined to share the toys with family when there is presence of an authority.
This led to B being correct, since if the authority is a parent, is more likely they will share with their siblings than non - siblings
User avatar
Oppenheimer1945
Joined: 16 Jul 2019
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 784
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 223
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V76 DI80
GPA: 7.81
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: children are more inclined to share with family members when they feel they are being observed by an authority figure.


Pre Thinking: Any authority figure impacts the sharing behavior among siblings

A) toys are new and there is a sharing behavior strenghtens. If it were old toys and children were sharing it means children are less interested in toys (hold)

B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.
-we are talking about authority fig . This choice is not relevant

C. the siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys.
-this is not impacting the arguement

D. the room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys.
-this is a alternte reason hence a mild weakener

E. the adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling.
- this choice talks about both sibling and non-sibling, hence we are avoid this choice

A)
User avatar
riturajsingh21
Joined: 12 Aug 2014
Last visit: 11 Jul 2025
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
38
 [1]
Given Kudos: 165
Posts: 31
Kudos: 38
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion of the argument - Children are more inclined to share with family members when they feel they are being observed by an authority figure.

Option stressing on Authority figure (Parents etc.) will confirm the conclusion further.

Let’s review options Choices now:

A- Type of Toy will be irrelevant is this case
B- Bingo, Parents Correct
C- Age is out of scope
D- # of Toys is again out of scope
E- Authority is not relevant. it is a weakner actually.

Correct answer is - B
User avatar
busygmatbee1290
Joined: 27 Dec 2023
Last visit: 18 Mar 2025
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q87 V90 DI86
GPA: 10/10
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q87 V90 DI86
Posts: 50
Kudos: 73
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­A. the toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home.
This has nothing to do with "authority figure" being present. 

B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.
This makes sense because it shows that the adult present was an "authority figure" to the kids. 

C. the siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys.
This has nothing to do with "authority figure" being present. 

D. the room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys.
This has nothing to do with "authority figure" being present. 

E. the adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling.
This seems correct too -  I was confused but it seems to explain something that the qs doesn't concern itself with. 
User avatar
xhym
Joined: 11 Jun 2024
Last visit: 20 Oct 2025
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
83
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Location: Canada
Products:
Posts: 65
Kudos: 83
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Psychologist: In a study, children were observed in a room filled with various toys. When an adult was present in the room, the children were more likely to share toys with their siblings than with non-siblings. This suggests that children are more inclined to share with family members when they feel they are being observed by an authority figure.

The psychologist's argument would be most strengthened if it were true that, during the study, the children exhibited increased sharing behavior when:

A. the toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home.

B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.

C. the siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys.

D. the room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys.

E. the adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling.


­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­The best answer is B.

If the observing adult was a parent, it directly connects the observation by an authority figure (parent) to increased sharing behavior among siblings, supporting the psychologist's claim that children share more with family when they feel they are being observed by an authority figure. A regular stranger or non-relative adult would not necessarily be an authority figure for children, the same way that parents are.
User avatar
shiv_001
Joined: 18 Apr 2024
Last visit: 11 May 2025
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 5
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Psychologist: In a study, children were observed in a room filled with various toys. When an adult was present in the room, the children were more likely to share toys with their siblings than with non-siblings. This suggests that children are more inclined to share with family members when they feel they are being observed by an authority figure.

The psychologist's argument would be most strengthened if it were true that, during the study, the children exhibited increased sharing behavior when:

A. the toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home.

B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.

C. the siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys.

D. the room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys.

E. the adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling.


­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­Option A : This can be probable answer as this confirms that toys were completly new to children which strengthens the argument by eleminating probable cause of sharing of toys to familarity of children with toys. -  Answer
Option B : This weakens the argument by stating relationship of authority figure with children. If it is true, probable cause of toys sharing activity can be attributed to the fact given in option rather than authority figure. - Not an Answer
Option C : This statement weakens argument in question by attributing sharing activity to younger children who're siblings. - Not an Answer
Option D : Neither weakens nor strengthens an argument.- Not an answer
Option E : .- Not an answer 
User avatar
Argh123
Joined: 16 Aug 2022
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
27
 [1]
Given Kudos: 120
Posts: 24
Kudos: 27
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Support: children are more inclined to share with family when they feel they are being watched by an authoritative figme. Sol: the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult

Parent -an authoritative fig

A C DE eliminated
User avatar
Dee889
Joined: 12 Dec 2023
Last visit: 01 Jan 2025
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The fact that the adults (authority figures) encouraged the children to share either with siblings or non-siblings, yet the  children still chose to share with the siblings instead, proving that children are more likely to share with a family member in the presence of an authority figure. =11ptAns= E

 
User avatar
HarshaBujji
Joined: 29 Jun 2020
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 695
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 247
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 695
Kudos: 885
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Bunuel
Psychologist: In a study, children were observed in a room filled with various toys. When an adult was present in the room, the children were more likely to share toys with their siblings than with non-siblings. This suggests that children are more inclined to share with family members when they feel they are being observed by an authority figure.

The psychologist's argument would be most strengthened if it were true that, during the study, the children exhibited increased sharing behavior when:




­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­A. the toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home. Irrelevant 

B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult. 

C. the siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys.  Irrelevant 

D. the room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys.   

E. the adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling.

Battle is between B, D & E. Conclusion talked about authoritative figure. So we can eliminate B BCS it is OFS 

D vs E , If the tendency increases it will strengthen to find the pattern. 

IMO D. 
 
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts