Hello everyone,
Good luck and a great competition to everyone.
May the green team win

My explanation for this question:
1st: We are dealing with kind of Strengthen question.
2nd: Lets break down the argument:
Psychologist: In a study, children were observed in a room filled with various toys. - background.
When an adult was present in the room, the children were more likely to share toys with their siblings than with non-siblings. premise.
This suggests that children are more inclined to share with family members when they feel they are being observed by an authority figure. - our conclusion.
The psychologist's argument would be most strengthened if it were true that, during the study, the children exhibited increased sharing behavior when:
A. the toys in the room were new to the children, rather than toys they had previously played with at home.
If the siblings children knew the toys from their home, there is a possible explanation that this is why they shared toys with their siblings. Not because of the authority figure.
By ruling out this possible explanation. We reinforce the psychologist's argument.
Keep.
B. the observing adult was a parent of the siblings, rather than a stranger or non-relative adult.
A sibling parent is present, and the children share the toys. No effect on the argument. It is the parent who now influences the children, not the authority figure. Also, by choosing this answer we are making the assumption in the real world that if a parent is present, the siblings and children will share the toys more. - Eliminate.
'Unclear Impact'
C. the siblings were younger and appeared to need help understanding how to use the toys, compared to non-siblings who were adept at using the toys.
this is a possible explanation why they were playing together and not why they were effected by the authority figure.
furthermore, if they needed help they should ask other children to help them, not just the siblings.
No tie to the Conclusion
D. the room had more toys available than usual, making it easier for children to find and share multiple toys.
this option gives us more information that can strengthen the argument in some way.
but There is no connection to the authority figure here. How does it strengthen our conclusion? it is not. - Eliminate.
'No tie to the conclusion'
E. the adult explicitly encouraged the children to share, regardless of whether the other child was a sibling or a non-sibling.
If the adult specifically told them to share, it is not the authority figure that influences them to share.
Moreover, it does not strengthen the conclusion because we do not know whether the siblings share more toys with each other than with others - Eliminate.
'No tie to the conclusion'
A is the answer.